False negative fine needle aspiration thyroid cytology: an institutional experience

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabela Martins ◽  
Evelina Mendonca ◽  
Antonio Garrao ◽  
Hugo Marques ◽  
Maria Cid ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-118
Author(s):  
Mohammad Amzad Hossain ◽  
Md Zahedul Alam ◽  
Md Rojibul Haque ◽  
Md Nazmul Haque ◽  
KM Nurul Alam ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the role of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative diagnosis of malignancy in parotid and submandibular gland neoplasm. Methods: This cross sectional study on 50 cases was conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery of Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital and Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January’2009 to June 2010. Results: Fine needle aspiration cytology findings of our all 50 cases were compared with postoperative histopathological reports. Out of the 50 cases, in 36(72%) cases of benign neoplasm and 7(14%) cases of malignant neoplasm, pre-operative FNAC findings and post operative histopathological findings were same. In 7 cases, FNAC and post operative histopathological findings did not matched. These were 2 (4%) false positive and 5 (10%) false negative result.In our study sensitivity of FNAC for reporting malignancy was 58.33%, specificity to rule out malignancy was 94.73% and overall accuracy in detecting malignant tumour was 86%. Positive predictive value and negative value were 77.77% and 87.80% respectively. It can be concluded that fine needle aspiration cytology is a safe, cheap and useful preoperative diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of malignancy in parotid and submandibular gland, but as fine needle aspiration cytology partly depends on operator skill, it may give false negative and false positive result. Conclusion: FNAC is a useful preoperative diagnostic tool for malignant parotid and submandibular glands with high specificity and sensitivity. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v19i2.17634 Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 19(2): 110-118


2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan H. Hughes ◽  
Emily E. Volk ◽  
David C. Wilbur

Abstract Context.—We use data from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology to identify common diagnostic errors in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Objective.—To identify salivary gland FNA cases with poor performance characteristics in the Nongynecologic Cytology Program surveys, so that the most common diagnostic pitfalls can be avoided. Design.—A retrospective review of the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytology Program's cumulative data from 1999 to 2003 revealed the most common false-positive and false-negative interpretations on FNA for common salivary gland lesions. Slides that performed poorly were then reviewed to identify the cytologic characteristics that may have contributed to their poor performance. Results.—A total of 6249 participant responses with general interpretations of benign (n = 4642) or malignant (n= 1607) were reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of the participant responses for correctly interpreting the cases as benign or malignant were 73% and 91%, respectively. Benign cases with the highest false-positive rates were monomorphic adenoma (53% false-positive), intraparotid lymph node (36%), oncocytoma (18%), and granulomatous sialadenitis (10%). Malignant cases with the highest false-negative rates were lymphoma (57%), acinic cell carcinoma (49%), low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (43%), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (33%). Selected review of the most discordant individual cases revealed possible explanations for some of the interpretative errors. Conclusions.—These data confirm the difficulty associated with interpretation of salivary gland FNA specimens. Cytologists should be aware of the potential false-positive and false-negative interpretations that can occur in FNAs from this organ site in order to minimize the possibility of diagnostic errors.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-49
Author(s):  
Stephen S. Raab ◽  
Jan F. Silverman ◽  
Tarik M. Elsheikh ◽  
Patricia A. Thomas ◽  
Paul E. Wakely

Objective. The prevalence of thyroid nodularity in children has been estimated to be 1.8%. The reported prevalence of specific diseases which comprise these nodules is conflicting as evidenced by a reported range of malignancy of 2 to 50% in solitary nodules. In order to better classify pediatric (<18 years old) thyroid disease and evaluate the utility of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in this patient population, we retrospectively reviewed 66 FNABs from 64 thyroid nodules and 2 perithyroid lymph nodes from 57 patients. Methodology. Patients: The study was composed of 8 males and 49 females who ranged in age from 1 to 18 years old (mean = 13.1). Design: Surgical and/or clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. The 66 FNAB diagnoses were initially classified into specific diseases. However, for the purpose of this review, the cases were classified as: 3 insufficient, 51 benign, 8 suspicious, and 4 malignant. Results. There were no "false positives" and one "false negative" (a papillary carcinoma was misdiagnosed as a benign nodule). Overall, 10 patients (18%) had malignant thyroid lesions, including 8 papillary carcinomas and 2 follicular carcinomas. Benign diagnoses included benign nodule, cyst, lymphocytic thyroiditis, granulomatous thyroiditis, hyperplasia, and abscess. Conclusions. The prevalence of malignancy in pediatric patients with thyroid nodules was 18%. We conclude that, because of its high diagnostic accuracy and minimal invasiveness, FNAB is useful in the management of pediatric thyroid nodules.


2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 846-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo G. Pastorello ◽  
Camila Destefani ◽  
Pedro H. Pinto ◽  
Caroline H. Credidio ◽  
Rafael X. Reis ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1667-1669
Author(s):  
Timothy Myers ◽  
Helen H. Wang

Abstract Objective.—To compare and contrast benign and malignant lesions of the breast that have similar appearances on fine-needle aspiration cytology and that constitute diagnostic pitfalls. Design.—The cytology files (dated November 1995 through May 1998) of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center were searched to identify cases of breast fine-needle aspiration biopsies that were highly cellular and composed of bland-appearing spindle/columnar cells and that could represent either epithelial or stromal cells; these cases were reported as indeterminate (atypical/suspicious) and had subsequent excisional biopsies taken. Results.—Four such cases were found. Two were fibroadenomas and 2 were papillary carcinomas. Their appearances were strikingly similar on aspiration cytology. All cases were prepared with the ThinPrep method. On microscopic examination, all 4 cases were hypercellular and had many single cells and clusters of columnar/elongate cells. Immunocytochemistry proved these cells to be of epithelial origin. At least occasional bipolar stromal cells were seen in the background. The only appreciable difference between the benign and malignant cases was more significant nuclear atypia, which was barely discernible, in the malignant cases. Immunocytochemistry for smooth muscle actin was helpful in 2 cases that had sufficient material. Conclusions.—Some cases of fibroadenomas and papillary carcinomas can be very difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Immunocytochemistry may be helpful if sufficient material is available. To avoid false-negative or false-positive diagnosis on cytology, it is best to report such cases as atypical or suspicious with final diagnosis pending excisional biopsy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
Shova Kunwar ◽  
Barsha Bajracharya ◽  
Kavita Karmacharya ◽  
Amar Narayan Shrestha

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration cytology is considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of thyroid lesion by comparing it with the corresponding histopathologic diagnosis after thyroidectomy. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted over five years at a teaching hospital in Kathmandu. Eighty-nine cases of FNAC of thyroid nodule with subsequent histopathological reports were reviewed. The corresponding reports were compared and the accuracy of FNAC diagnosis was evaluated. Results: 87% of the cases were females and the majority of cases were in the age group 41 to 50 years. Among 89 cases, 55 were reported as benign on cytology and 34 were reported as malignant. On histopathological examination, out of 55 cases diagnosed as benign on cytology, 47 cases were diagnosed as benign whereas eight cases were diagnosed as malignant. HPE of 34 cases diagnosed as malignant on cytology showed that 29 were malignant and five were benign. The false-positive rate was 9.6% and the false-negative rate was 21.6%. The sensitivity was 78.3% and specificity was 90.3%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 85.2% and 85.4% respectively. The accuracy of FNAC in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid lesions was 85.3%. Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that FNAC is a sensitive method for the diagnosis of a solid thyroid lesion


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 340-342
Author(s):  
H Iftikhar ◽  
M Sohail Awan ◽  
M Usman ◽  
A Khoja ◽  
W Khan

Introduction Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an important diagnostic tool used preoperatively for the diagnosis of parotid lump. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma comprises 5–10% of all salivary gland tumours. It poses a diagnostic challenge on FNAC with high false negative rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the discordance between cytology/FNAC and histopathology in patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Material and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014. Patients aged 18 years and above with FNAC or histopathology suggestive of mucoepidermoid carcinoma were identified. FNAC when compared with histology (gold standard) was classified into true positive (presence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma correctly diagnosed on FNAC), true negative (absence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma correctly diagnosed on FNAC), false positive (FNAC incorrectly diagnosed mucoepidermoid carcinoma), false negative (FNAC failed to diagnose mucoepidermoid carcinoma). Results A total of 16 patients fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Seven cytological samples were true positive (ie correctly diagnosed mucoepidermoid carcinoma by FNAC), eight cytological specimens were false negative (ie could not pick up mucoepidermoid carcinoma on FNAC). One case was false positive on cytology (ie diagnosed mucoepidermoid carcinoma on FNAC but was reported to be Warthin’s tumour on histopathology) and none were true negative. Conclusion FNAC is not reliable for diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. More than 50% of our patients had discordant results between cytology and histology. We recommend a high index of suspicion for mucoepidermoid carcinoma given the poor yield of cytology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document