scholarly journals Inflammatory biomarkers and tumoral growth factors are modulated by exercise in breast cancer survivors

Author(s):  
Meneses-Echávez José Francisco ◽  
Ramírez-Vélez Robinson ◽  
González Jiménez Emilio ◽  
Río-Valle Jacqueline Schmidt ◽  
Izquierdo Mikel

Introduction: Insulin-like growth factors (IGF´s) play a crucial role in controlling cancer cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Exercise has been postulated as an effective intervention in improving cancer-related outcomes and survival, although its effects on IGF´s are not well understood. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the effects of exercise in modulating IGF´s system in breast cancer survivors. Methods: Databases of PuMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, SPORTdiscus, LILACS and Scopus were systematically searched up to November 2014. Effect estimates were calculated through a random-effects model of meta- analysis according to the DerSimonian and Laird method. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I 2 test. Risk of bias and methodological quality were evaluated using the PEDro score.

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. S65 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Meneses Echavez ◽  
R. Ramírez Vélez ◽  
E. González Jímenez ◽  
M.J. Sanchéz Pérez ◽  
E. Molina Montes

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Jian Liu ◽  
Guangning Nie ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Zehuai Wen ◽  
Liming Lu ◽  
...  

Aim of the Study. Hot flashes impair the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Nonhormonal management is an important consideration. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of nonhormonal hot flash treatments for breast cancer survivors. Materials and Methods. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Chinese Biomedicine Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, and VIP up to May 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting nonhormonal hot flash treatments for breast cancer survivors were included. Primary outcome measurements were hot flash frequency and hot flash score of posttreatment. The methodological quality of each study was assessed with Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. Results. 16 RCTs involving 2,349 participants were included. The nonhormonal therapies used in the included studies were classified as follows: lifestyle changes, mind-body techniques, dietary/supplements, SSRIs/SNRIs, other medications, and other therapies. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that the general effect of nonhormonal management was statistically more effective than no treatment/placebo/sham in reducing hot flash frequency (SMD = −0.60, 95% CI [−1.13, −0.06]; P=0.03)) and hot flash score (SMD = −0.38, 95% CI [−0.68, −0.08]). For hot flash frequency, results from the NMA showed that there was no statistically significant difference between any two of the nonhormonal treatments. Another NMA result indicated that acupuncture (other therapies) was 16.05 points more effective in reducing hot flash scores than no treatment/waitlist (SMD = −16.05, 95% CI [−30.2, −1.99]). These results were statistically significant. Acupuncture was also ranked the optimal nonhormonal therapy for both hot flash frequency and hot flash score. The safety analysis showed that there were few related adverse events during acupuncture and that drug related adverse reactions could have also occurred in studies using drug interventions Conclusions. This network meta-analysis comparing nonhormonal treatments suggested that acupuncture might be more effective in improving hot flashes for breast cancer survivors. A pronounced placebo response was found during hot flash treatments. The evidence of safety for nonhormonal therapies was also insufficient. Therefore, at present, we cannot make confirmative recommendations of nonhormonal hot flash management for breast cancer survivors. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018082008).


Author(s):  
Carlota Castro-Espin ◽  
Antonio Agudo

Cancer survival continues to improve in high-income countries, partly explained by advances in screening and treatment. Previous studies have mainly examined the relationship between individual dietary components and cancer prognosis in tumours with good therapeutic response (breast, colon and prostate cancers). The aim of this review was to assess qualitatively (and quantitatively where appropriate) the associations of dietary patterns and cancer prognosis from published prospective cohort studies, as well as the effect of diet interventions by means of randomized controlled trials (RCT). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, and a total of 35 prospective cohort studies and 14 RCT published between 2011 and 2021 were selected. Better overall diet quality was associated with improved survival among breast and colorectal cancer survivors; adherence to the Mediterranean diet was associated to lower risk of mortality in colorectal and prostate cancer survivors. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model showed that higher versus lower diet quality was associated with a 23% reduction in overall mortality in breast cancer survivors. There was evidence that dietary interventions, generally combined with physical activity, improved overall quality of life, though most studies were in breast cancer survivors. Further cohort and intervention studies in other cancers are needed to make more specific recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document