scholarly journals The Influence of Family History of Hypertension on Hypertension Prevalence, Management and Healthy Behaviors among Korean Adults: Results from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2014–2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Leejee Choi ◽  
Kyuwoong Kim ◽  
Seulggie Choi ◽  
Sung Min Kim ◽  
Sang Min Park ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiebin Liu ◽  
Rodolfo Valdez ◽  
Paula W Yoon ◽  
Deidre Crocker ◽  
Ramal Moonesinghe ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254907
Author(s):  
Seung Jae Kim ◽  
Oh Deog Kwon ◽  
Eung-Joon Lee ◽  
Sun Myeong Ock ◽  
Kyung-Soo Kim

Background Family history (FH) is one of important risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, little is known about its impact on dyslipidemia prevalence and management status. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of FH of CVD on dyslipidemia prevalence, awareness, treatment, control, and healthy behaviors in Korean adults. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using representative data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2014–2018. A total of 22,024 participants aged ≥ 19 years without histories of CVDs were classified into two groups according to the presence of FH of CVD (with FH, n = 3,778; without FH, n = 18,246). FH of CVD was defined as having a first-degree relative with ischemic heart disease or stroke. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between FH of CVD and dyslipidemia prevalence, awareness, treatment, control, and healthy behaviors (weight control, non-smoking, non-risky drinking, sufficient physical activity, and undergoing health screening). Results FH of CVD was significantly associated with a higher dyslipidemia prevalence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.51), better awareness (aOR 1.54, 95%CI 1.19–2.00), and treatment rates (aOR 1.34, 95%CI 1.12–1.60), but not control. Having an FH of CVD was not predictive of any healthy behaviors in dyslipidemia patients. For non-dyslipidemia patients, FH of CVD even showed significant association with smoking (aOR 1.18, 95%CI 1.02–1.36), and risky drinking (aOR 1.20, 95%CI 1.03–1.40) while it was predictive of receiving health screening (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02–1.27). Conclusions Having an FH of CVD might positively trigger dyslipidemia patients to start pharmacological intervention, but not non-pharmacological interventions. Therefore, physicians should make more efforts to educate and promote the importance of non-pharmacological behavioral modification in dyslipidemia patients with an FH of CVD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document