scholarly journals KAI KURIŲ GILLES’IO DELEUZE’O SĄVOKŲ TEORINĖS IŠTAKOS

Problemos ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 225-235
Author(s):  
Laura Junutytė

Straipsnyje analizuojama dviejų Deleuze’o tapsmo ontologiją paveikusių klasikinių filosofų – Benedikto Spinozos ir Gottfriedo Leibnizo koncepcijos, ieškant jų įtakos pagrindinėms Deleuze’o sąvokoms. Tyrimo atspirties tašku pasirinkti Deleuze’o veikalai, skirti analizuoti minėtiems autoriams, kuriais remdamasis Deleuze’as kūrė savo autorinę filosofiją. Straipsnyje remiamasi teze, jog Deleuze’o filosofija nesuvokiama be nuorodų į klasikinę filosofiją. Jo sąvokos – senųjų sąvokų keitimo ir atnaujinimo rezultatas. Straipsnio pradžioje nagrinėjama Deleuze’o santykio su klasikiniais autoriais problema: kokios priežastys ir motyvai skatino Deleuze’ą domėtis filosofijos istorija pasirenkant mąstytojus, išvengiančius filosofijos tradicijos? Kokia prieiga prie klasikinių tekstų jam būdinga?Pagrindiniai žodžiai: imanencija, išraiška, būties vienbalsiškumas, klostė, įvykis.The Theoretical Origins of Some Gilles Deleuze’s ConceptsLaura Junutytė SummaryThe article analyzes the conceptions of Benedictus Spinoza and Gotfryd Leibniz, the authors who mostly influenced the ontology of becoming of Gilles Deleuze. The main object of this research is the first Deleuze’s publications about the traditional philosophers who became the basis for creating his original philosophy. The main thesis of this article is that Deleuze’s philosophy is incomprehensible without references to traditional philosophy because his concepts are a result of the transformation of old concepts. In the beginning of the article, the problem of Deleuze’s relationship with classical philosophers is considered: what kind of reasons and motives forced Deleuze to follow the history of philosophy and to choose the authors who avoid the tradition of philosophy? And what method was applied in reading these classical texts?Keywords: immanence, expression, univociy of being, the fold, the event.

Author(s):  
Ryan J. Johnson

This book explores how Deleuze's thought was shaped by Lucretian atomism — a formative but often-ignored influence from ancient philosophy. More than any other 20th-century philosopher, Gilles Deleuze considers himself an apprentice to the history of philosophy. But scholarship has ignored one of the more formative influences on Deleuze: Lucretian atomism. Deleuze's encounter with Lucretius sparked a way of thinking that resonates throughout all his writings: from immanent ontology to affirmative ethics, from dynamic materialism to the generation of thought itself. Filling a significant gap in Deleuze Studies, this book tells the story of the Deleuze-Lucretius encounter that begins and ends with a powerful claim: Lucretian atomism produced Deleuzianism.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Zahra Pakzad

<p>Francis Bacon as a precursor of modern painting, in addition to reputation in the fields of visual arts, has attracted the attention of many philosophers and scholars of the twentieth century due to its creative and controversial works. One of these philosophers is Gilles Deleuze. Gilles Deleuze is written numerous works in various fields ranging from photography and cinema to the history of philosophy. In a book entitled “Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sense”, Deleuze presented a new understanding of the concepts contained and hidden in Bacon’s paintings of Bacon. Seeking to explore Bacon’s position in painting and also Deleuze’s position in the philosophy, the current study intends to analyze Deleuze philosophical interpretation of the works of Bacon.</p>


Author(s):  
Hassan Melehy

Responding to long-standing criticisms that theoretical readings of early modern literary texts are anachronistic, Melehy argues that past and present phenomena may be understood alongside one another, while still respecting both of them. He brings together Gilles Deleuze and Michel de Montaigne through their shared interest in Lucretius. Melehy demonstrates a Lucretian-inflected materialism in Montaigne’s Essais that implicitly criticizes Platonic conceptions of the primacy of thought over matter, and concomitant human claims to dominate the physical and natural world. Melehy signals intersections between Montaigne’s dissident philosophy and Deleuze’s materialist re-conception of the history of philosophy in order to point out ways that the essayist’s work speaks to questions that are also pertinent to present-day meditations on the environment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 262
Author(s):  
Christian Fernando Ribeiro Guimarães Vinci

Procuraremos pensar com esse trabalho a especificidade da performance docente de Gilles Deleuze. Tomando como vetor relatos esparsos acerca de suas aulas, abordaremos a concepção de ensino de filosofia forjada pelo filósofo francês ao longo do exercício de sua atividade docente. Deleuze, em suas aulas, optava por seguir uma linha pedagógica muito distante daquela consagrada pelas academias, adotando como aporte privilegiado para expressar o seu pensamento – bem como o de outros filósofos – o espaço literário ao invés da história da filosofia. Visando acentuar a especificidade do trabalho professoral de Deleuze, propomos contrapor sua postura docente com a de outro importante filósofo, Immanuel Kant. Tal comparação demonstra-se possível uma vez que o tema sobre a impossibilidade de ensinar ou aprender o filosofar é algo em comum a ambos os pensadores, embora sejam filósofos que se encontram em campos de pensamento distintos. Apesar da distância, ambos os pensadores concordam que o filosofar não é algo da ordem da imitação, mas sim da criação. O intuito com tal trabalho de pensamento será o de sugerir algumas problematizações para se pensar o tópico ensino de filosofia.Abstract: With this work, we seek think the specificity of the teaching performance of Gilles Deleuze. Taking as vector scattered reports of their classes, we discuss the philosophy of teaching concept forged by the French philosopher during the year of his educational activity. Deleuze, in his classes, chose to follow a very distant pedagogical line that consecrated by the academies, adopting as privileged contribution to express his thoughts - as well as other philosophers - the literary space instead of the history of philosophy for example. In order to emphasize the specificity of professorial work of Deleuze, we propose counteract his teaching position with another important philosopher, Immanuel Kant. This comparison shows is possible since the theme of the impossibility of teaching or learning the philosophy is something common to both thinkers, although they are philosophers who are in different fields of thought. Despite the distance, both thinkers agree that philosophy is not something of the order of imitation, but of creation. The aim with this work of thought will be to suggest some problematizations to think about the topic of teaching philosophy. Keywords: Gilles Deleuze. Afeccion. Performativity. Teaching Philosophy. Literary Space 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document