scholarly journals Preimplantation genetic testing for a complex chromosome rearrangement, case report of a cryptic translocation detected on pre-PGT workup

Author(s):  
Arundhati Athalye ◽  
Rupesh Sanap ◽  
Prochi Madon ◽  
Dattatray Naik ◽  
Dhanashree Warang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. e56
Author(s):  
Teresa A. Cacchione ◽  
Lauren Walters-Sen ◽  
Dana Neitzel ◽  
Carlene Alouf ◽  
Joseph A. Lee ◽  
...  

Andrologia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Nguyen ◽  
F. Morel ◽  
P. Pennamen ◽  
P. Parent ◽  
N. Douet-Guilbert ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2784-2790 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Coco ◽  
M.I. Rahn ◽  
P. García Estanga ◽  
G. Antonioli ◽  
A.J. Solari

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Lledo ◽  
R Morales ◽  
J A Ortiz ◽  
A Cascales ◽  
A Fabregat ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Could cryptic subtelomeric traslocations in early recurrent miscarriage patients be diagnosed by preimplantation genetic testing? Summary answer PGT is a powerful tool to detect subtelomeric cryptic traslocations identifying the cause of early recurrent miscarriage and allowing subsequent genetic counselling. What is known already: Chromosome translocations are frequently associated with birth defects, spontaneous early pregnancy losses and infertility. However, submicroscopic traslocations (so-called cryptic traslocations) are too small to be detected by conventional karyotyping.. Due to balanced status, high resolution molecular techniques as arrayCGH are not able to detect it. Thus, cryptic traslocations detection is challenging. PGT is able to detect CNVs at higher resolution than routine karyotyping. Therefore, the recurrent diagnosis of CNV at embryo level could suggest a subchromosomal parental traslocation. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of using PGT as an indicator of parental balanced cryptic traslocations. Study design, size, duration We included three couples who underwent PGT for unexplained repeated pregnancy loss (RPL) in our clinic from February 2020 to November 2020. Common established causes of RPL (uterine anomalies, antiphospholipid syndrome, immunological, hormonal and metabolic disorders) were previously rouled-out. Even couple karyotypes were normal. Twenty-three embryos from those couples were biopsied at blastocyst and analysed for CNVs detection using low coverage whole genome NGS. Participants/materials, setting, methods PGT by NGS was performed by Veriseq-NGS (Illumina), with previous whole genome amplification. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using parental blood samples were performed to validate the origin of subchromosomal number variation. Commercially available subtelomeric specific probes were selected according to the CNV identified and the procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Main results and the role of chance Overall, CNVs of terminal duplication and deletion that imply unbalanced traslocation derivatives were detected in the 43.5% of biopsied embryos. For couple 1, 4 out of 5 embryos (80%) carried deletion of telomeric region on chromosomes 5 and 21. Three out of 6 biopsed embyos (50%) were diagnosed with subchromosomal copy variants at telomeric region on chromosomes 6 and 16 for couple 2. In the case of couple 3, three out of 12 embryos (25%) were carriers of CNV at subtelomeric region on chromosomes 2 and 6. The size of CNVs detected ranges from 8Mb to 20Mb. Accurate diagnosis with the parental study was made by FISH. The combination of probes to detect the structural chromosome alteration were: Tel5qter-LSI21q, Tel6pter-CEP16 and Tel6pter-CEP6 for each couple respectively. The FISH studies reveal that CNVs were inherited from one parent carrying the balanced cryptic traslocation. Ultimately, the abnormal karyotype from the carrier parent were 46,XY,t(5;21)(q33.2;q21.2) for couple 1, 46,XY,t(6;16)(p22.3;q22.1) for couple 2 and 46,XY,t(2;6)(p25.1;p24.2) for couple 3. Finally, each couple performed a cryotransfer of a single normal balanced embryo. Two pregnancies are ongoing. Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of this approach is the NGS- PGT resolution. CNVs smaller than 5Mb could not be detected. Wider implications of the findings: This study shows the value of PGT for unexplained RPL, followed by parental FISH to better characterize CNVs and identify couples in whom one partner carries a cryptic translocation. Accurate diagnosis of parental chromosome translocation can achieve with FISH only, but FISH would not be performed unless PGT showed CNVs. Trial registration number Not applicable


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 2557-2561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina Merrion ◽  
Melissa Maisenbacher

Abstract Purpose To report the unbalanced chromosome rearrangement rate and overall aneuploidy rate in day 5/6 embryos from a series of patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) for the pericentric inversion 9 variant, inv(9)(p11q13) or inv(9)(p12q13), with concurrent 24 chromosome preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis. IVF cycles and embryo biopsies were performed by referring clinics. Fifty-two trophectoderm biopsy samples from seven couples were sent to a single lab for PGT-SR for an inversion 9 variant with concurrent 24 chromosome PGT-A using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays with bioinformatics. Results The unbalanced rearrangement rate for this embryo cohort was 0/52 (0.0%); mean maternal age per embryo was 33.3 years (range 21–39 years). The overall euploid rate was 61.5% and aneuploidy rate was 38.5%. Conclusions Chromosome 9 pericentric inversions did not result in unbalanced structural rearrangements in day 5/6 embryo samples, supporting that this population variant is not associated with increased reproductive risks.


2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1666-1671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Hernando ◽  
Alberto Plaja ◽  
Vicens Català ◽  
Enric Sarret ◽  
Josep Egozcue ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document