Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies, 21st Ed

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  

Keep up-to-date with current clinical practice guidelines and policies from the American Academy of Pediatrics with the latest edition of this clinical reference classic. https://shop.aap.org/pediatric-clinical-practice-guidelines-policies-21st-edition-paperback/

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  

Keep current with the latest clinical practice guidelines and policies from the American Academy of Pediatrics covering more than 40 clinical practice guidelines, plus every AAP policy statement, clinical report, and technical report through December 2017.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  

Keep current with the latest clinical practice guidelines and policies from the American Academy of Pediatrics covering more than 50 clinical practice guidelines, plus every AAP policy statement, clinical report, and technical report through December 2018. https://shop.aap.org/pediatric-clinical-practice-guidelines-policies-19th-edition-paperback/


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 112-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chua ◽  
Jessica Ming ◽  
Shang-Jen Chang ◽  
Joana Dos Santos ◽  
Niraj Mistry ◽  
...  

Introduction: Concerns regarding the quality, credibility, and applicability of recently published pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) clinical practice guidelines have been raised due to the inconsistencies of recommendations between them. We aimed to determine the quality of the recent clinical practice guidelines on pediatric UTI by using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument, and summarize the standard of care in diagnosis and management of pediatric UTI from the top three clinical practice guidelines.Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on medical literature electronic databases and international guideline repository websites. English language-based clinical practice guidelines from 2007–2016 endorsed by any international society or government organization providing recommendations for the management of pediatric UTI were considered. Eligible clinical practice guidelines were independently appraised by six reviewers using the AGREE II tool. Clinical practice guidelines were assessed for standardized domains and summarized for overall quality. Interrater reliability was assessed using inter-class coefficient (ICC).Results: Thirteen clinical practice guidelines were critically reviewed. The Spanish clinical practice guidelines, American Academy of Pediatrics, and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence clinical practice guidelines consistently scored high on all AGREE domains (total averaged domain scores 90, 88, and 88, respectively). Among the six reviewers, there was a high degree of inter-rater reliability (average measure ICC 0.938; p<0.0001). There is reasonable consensus among the top three clinical practice guidelines in their major recommendations.Conclusions: The clinical practice guidelines from Spain, American Academy of Pediatrics, and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, with their major recommendations being similar, have scored highly on the AGREE II indicators of quality for the clinical practice guidelines development process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wierzbicka-Rot ◽  
Artur Gadomski

In February 2019 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery published clinical practice guidelines which provides evidence-based recommendations that applies to children under consideration for tonsillectomy. This update to the 2011 publication includes large amount of new, practical information about pre-, intra- and postoperative care and management, that can be useful for surgeons as well as GPs and pediatricians


2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Andrés M. Bur ◽  
Richard M. Rosenfeld

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), developed to inform clinicians, patients, and policy makers about what constitutes optimal clinical care, are one way of increasing implementation of evidence into clinical practice. Many factors must be considered by multidisciplinary guideline panels, including strength of available evidence, limitations of current knowledge, risks/benefits of interventions, patient values, and limited resources. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is a framework for summarizing evidence that has been endorsed by many national and international organizations for developing CPGs. But is GRADE the right choice for CPGs developed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF)? In this commentary, we will introduce GRADE, discuss its strengths and limitations, and address the question of what potential benefits GRADE might offer beyond existing methodology used by the AAO-HNSF in developing CPGs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document