Inpatient Interpreter Use by Residents and Nurses

Author(s):  
Mary Pilarz ◽  
Karen Rychlik ◽  
Victoria Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Heaney ◽  
Sharon Moreham

The purpose of this study was to explore interpreter service utilisation in a Melbourne metropolitan healthcare system. 109 staff members working at the three campuses comprising this healthcare system completed questionnaires. Results reflected an under-usage of professional interpreters and an over-reliance on informal interpreters. A lack of knowledge about interpreter services was related to a lack of formal interpreter use and an increased use of informal interpreters. While the presence of an onsite interpreter coordination service at one of the campuses did not affect the level of familiarity or use of formal interpreters, it was related to a decreased use of informal interpreters. Further promotion and education regarding interpreter services is imperative to ensure that a safe, efficient and equitable service is being provided to all clients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabienne N. Jaeger ◽  
Nicole Pellaud ◽  
Bénédicte Laville ◽  
Pierre Klauser

Abstract Background The aim of this nationwide study was to investigate barriers to adequate professional interpreter use and to describe existing initiatives and identify key factors for successful interpreter policies in primary care, using Switzerland as a case study. Methods Adult and paediatric primary care providers were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. All accredited regional interpreter agencies were contacted first by email and, in the absence of a reply, by mail and then by phone. Local as well as the national health authorities were asked about existing policies. Results 599 primary care physicians participated. Among other reasons, physicians identified cumbersome organization (58.7%), absent financial coverage (53.7%) and lack of knowledge on how to arrange interpreter interventions (44%) as main barriers. The odds of organising professional interpreters were 6.6-times higher with full financial coverage. Some agencies confirmed difficulties providing professional interpreters for certain languages at a timely manner. Degrees of coverage of professional interpreter costs (full coverage to none) and organization varied between regions resulting in different levels of unmet needs. Conclusions Professional interpreter use can be improved through the following points: increase awareness and knowledge of primary care providers on interpreter use and organization, ensure financial coverage, as well as address organizational aspects. Examples of successful interventions exist.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 2756-2757
Author(s):  
William A. Berk ◽  
Katleen S. Lozada ◽  
Ben A. McVane ◽  
Marc A. Probst
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (S2) ◽  
pp. 324-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quyen Ngo-Metzger ◽  
Dara H. Sorkin ◽  
Russell S. Phillips ◽  
Sheldon Greenfield ◽  
Michael P. Massagli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Monica Eneriz-Wiemer ◽  
Lee Sanders ◽  
Mary McIntyre ◽  
Fernando Mendoza ◽  
D. Do ◽  
...  

To ensure timely appropriate care for low-birth-weight (LBW) infants, healthcare providers must communicate effectively with parents, even when language barriers exist. We sought to evaluate whether non-English primary language (NEPL) and professional in-person interpreter use were associated with differential hospital length of stay for LBW infants, who may incur high healthcare costs. We analyzed data for 2047 infants born between 1 January 2008 and 30 April 2013 with weight <2500 g at one hospital with high NEPL prevalence. We evaluated relationships of NEPL and in-person interpreter use on length of stay, adjusting for medical severity. Overall, 396 (19%) had NEPL parents. Fifty-three percent of NEPL parents had documented interpreter use. Length of stay ranged from 1 to 195 days (median 11). Infants of NEPL parents with no interpreter use had a 49% shorter length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43–0.61) compared to English-speakers. Infants of parents with NEPL and low interpreter use (<25% of hospital days) had a 26% longer length of stay (adjusted IRR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.51). NEPL and high interpreter use (>25% of hospital days) showed a trend for an even longer length of stay. Unmeasured clinical and social/cultural factors may contribute to differences in length of stay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document