Simple Apnea Monitoring May Not Work

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-561
Author(s):  
NORMAN LEWAK

To the Editor: In August 1975 (Pediatrics 56:296, August 1975) I reported on an infant who died of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) despite apnea monitoring in an intensive care nursery. My communication was made to counter lay articles advocating use of apnea monitors to “prevent” SIDS. Similar responses to home apnea monitor advocates have been made in a Pediatrics commentary1 and an American Academy of Pediatrics committee statement.2 An article has since appeared that

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-666
Author(s):  
J. F. L.

British police no longer answer burglar-alarm calls with enthusiasm. Who can blame them? Statistics indicate that 98.8% of automatic burglar-alarm calls are false. It is estimated that false alarms are costing British taxpayers $36 million a year.1 What connection does this observation have with pediatrics? The article by Kelly et al. in this issue (p. 511) recommends home monitoring with apnea alarms to perhaps abort the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in a group of infants judged to be at risk. I can't help but wonder about the "cost" of false alarms in this situation and in the intensive care nursery, where their use is universal.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (6) ◽  
pp. 877-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex A. Kane ◽  
Laura E. Mitchell ◽  
Kathleen P. Craven ◽  
Jeffrey L. Marsh

Objective. To verify and determine the cause of an increase in the referral of infants with plagiocephaly without synostosis (PWS) to a single tertiary craniofacial center. Design. A chart review was performed for 269 infants with a diagnosis of PWS who presented to a single tertiary craniofacial center between 1979 and 1994. The pattern of referral for PWS was analyzed using both simple linear regression and time series regression analyses. In addition, the referral pattern for PWS was compared with that for infants seen at the same center who received a diagnosis of synostotic plagiocephaly. Changes in the distribution of several demographic, perinatal, and clinical variables during the study period were also assessed. Finally, in an effort to identify correlates of the risk of PWS developing, characteristics of patients who were Missouri residents and presented between 1992 and 1994 were evaluated and compared with those of the 1993 Missouri live birth cohort. Setting. The Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Deformities Institute, St Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University Medical Center. Results. The average annual number of referrals to our center for PWS in the period 1992 to 1994 was more than sixfold greater than that for the preceding 13 years. There was a statistically significant increase in the annual number of referrals to our center during the 16-year study period. Moreover, there was evidence that the average annual increase in referrals was significantly greater during the last 3 years (1992 through 1994) of the study than in the first 13 years. This shift in the referral patterns is roughly contemporaneous with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations regarding infant sleep position. There was no evidence that either the mean number of referrals or the average annual increase in referrals for patients with synostosis changed during the study period. Among patients with PWS, the average age at presentation did not change during the study period. There were also no significant changes in the distribution of other demographic, perinatal, and clinical variables. When compared with the Missouri birth cohort, infants with PWS were significantly more likely to be boys and to have been delivered by forceps. There was also some evidence that patients with PWS were more likely to be born prematurely and to be products of multiple-gestation pregnancies. These associations were, however, of only borderline statistical significance. Conclusion. Referrals to our center for PWS increased markedly in 1992 relative to previous years. The temporal coincidence of this increase with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation to avoid the prone sleeping position, to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, suggests a possible causal relationship. If this association is causal, education regarding the need for head position rotation coupled with that for sudden infant death syndrome should obviate positional PWS.


Medical Care ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 938-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Gibson ◽  
Neil Fleming ◽  
David Fleming ◽  
Jennifer Culhane ◽  
Fern Hauck ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Merle Johnson ◽  
Frances A. Coletta ◽  
Nicholas Hether ◽  
Richard Cotter

Both retrospective and risk factor studies1-5 have shown that infants who sleep in the prone position increase their risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). These data compelled the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1992 to recommend that parents avoid letting infants sleep in the prone position.6 Subsequent research demonstrated a drop in both prone sleeping and SIDS.7-9 These outcomes resulted in a renewal of the recommendation in 1994).10,11 Recent survey data indicate that pediatricians and family physicians are less likely to recommend the prone position9-14 and that prone sleeping has decreased from 74% to 58% for infants over 1 month of age.8-11


2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Wilson Jones

IN 1992 , THE AMERICAN Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published the recommendation that “healthy infants, when being put down for sleep, be positioned on their side or back (p.1120),” with the goal of reducing sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).1 This guideline was later amended to recommend only the “back-to-sleep” position, although side positioning is still considered safer than prone.2 Prior to this recommendation, the preferred position for sleeping infants in the U.S. was prone.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Kulkarni ◽  
Robert T. Hall ◽  
Philip G. Rhodes ◽  
Michael B. Sheehan

The postneonatal infant mortality (PNIM) of 2,205 infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit from January 1971 to December 1974 was 44 in 1,000 infants who survived to age 28 days. This rate is approximately ten times that of the general population. Congenital malformations (59%), infections (12%), sudden infant death syndrome (10%), and asphyxial brain damage (10%) were the most common causes of death. One third (26) of the infants remained in the hospital whereas two thirds (52) had been dismissed prior to death. All who remained in the hospital plus 36 who had been dismissed died of severe illnesses that were incompatible with prolonged survival. The remaining PNIM was 10 in 1,000 neonatal survivors. This rate is still twice that of the general population. These deaths occurred in infants who were apparently well at the time of dismissal and subsequent examinations. Sudden infant death syndrome and infections constituted the largest portion of this mortality. Factors contributing to mortality in this group were poor socioeconomic status and low birth weight. Maternal age, race, marital status, and neonatal illnesses including apnea were not significantly related. Factors that appear to be important in the birth of high-risk infants continued to be operative in the postneonatal period, and contribute to a high mortality in apparently normal infants dismissed from the neonatal intensive care unit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document