scholarly journals Appropriate Use Criteria and the Imaging Mandate

2017 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Gregory J Dehmer ◽  
Leah White ◽  
John U Doherty ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Appropriate use criteria (AUC) have existed for over 30 years and are being deployed with increasing frequency to study the delivery of healthcare. The goal of AUC is to advise all stakeholders about the reasonable use of testing procedures or therapies to improve symptoms, quality of life, and health outcomes. Numerous studies have shown the favorable effects of AUC to limit the overuse of unnecessary procedures while also promoting high-quality clinical care and cost savings. AUC evaluating only a single imaging modality have been replaced by multimodality documents, making it easier for the clinician to evaluate the appropriateness of multiple imaging methods in various clinical scenarios. The Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 contained language mandating the use of AUC when ordering certain advanced cardiac imaging tests, and this requirement is currently scheduled for implementation in January 2020. Clinicians need to be aware of the increasing use of AUC and the financial implications of the AUC mandate legislation.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peihan Xie ◽  
Xiaodong Zhuang ◽  
Menghui Liu ◽  
Shaozhao Zhang ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundEchocardiography (echo) is the primary imaging modality for infective endocarditis (IE). However, the recommendations on timing and mode selection for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vary across guidelines, which can be confusing for clinical decision makers. In this case, we aim to appraise the quality of recommendations by appraising the quality of various guidelines.MethodsA search of guidelines containing recommendations for the appropriate use of echo in adult IE patients published in English between 2007 and 2019 was conducted. The APPRAISAL OF GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH & EVALUATION II (AGREE II) instrument was applied independently by two reviewers to assess the integrated quality of the identified guidelines. The recommendations of concern are extracted from related chapters.ResultsA total of 9 guidelines met the criteria, with AGREE II scores ranging from 36% to 79%, and the domain of “stakeholder involvement” received the lowest score. The most contentious issue is whether a follow-up TEE is mandatory in uncomplicated native valve IE with an initial positive TTE. Conflicting recommendations are presented with a low evidence level based on little evidence.ConclusionsIn general, the recommendations proposed in the 9 identified guidelines on the appropriate use of echo are satisfying. The guideline quality score can be taken into account by the clinicians when evaluating the recommendations for clinical decisions. Additional studies with high evidence level should be conducted on the most controversial issues of whether a subsequent TEE is mandatory in uncomplicated native valve IE with an initial positive TTE.


Author(s):  
Francesco Cellini ◽  
Rossella Di Franco ◽  
Stefania Manfrida ◽  
Valentina Borzillo ◽  
Ernesto Maranzano ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide over the last few months, and it continues to do so. Although some restrictions are being removed, it is not certain when the pandemic is going to be definitively over. Pandemics can be seen as a highly complex logistic scenario. From this perspective, some of the indications provided for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) during the COVID-19 pandemic could be maintained in the future in settings that limit the possibility of patients achieving symptom relief by radiotherapy. This paper has two aims: (1) to provide a summary of the indications for PRT during the COVID-19 pandemic; since some indications can differ slightly, and to avoid any possible contradictions, an expert panel composed of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and the Palliative Care and Supportive Therapies Working Group (AIRO-palliative) voted by consensus on the summary; (2) to introduce a clinical care model for PRT [endorsed by AIRO and by a spontaneous Italian collaborative network for PRT named “La Rete del Sollievo” (“The Net of Relief”)]. The proposed model, denoted “No cOmpRoMise on quality of life by pALliative radiotherapy” (NORMALITY), is based on an AIRO-palliative consensus-based list of clinical indications for PRT and on practical suggestions regarding the management of patients potentially suitable for PRT but dealing with highly complex logistics scenarios (similar to the ongoing logistics limits due to COVID-19). Material and Methods First, a summary of the available literature guidelines for PRT published during the COVID-19 pandemic was prepared. A systematic literature search based on the PRISMA approach was performed to retrieve the available literature reporting guideline indications fully or partially focused on PRT. Tables reporting each addressed clinical presentation and respective literature indications were prepared and distributed into two main groups: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. These summaries were voted in by consensus by selected members of the AIRO and AIRO-palliative panels. Second, based on the summary for palliative indications during the COVID-19 pandemic, a clinical care model to facilitate recruitment and delivery of PRT to patients in complex logistic scenarios was proposed. The summary tables were critically integrated and shuffled according to clinical presentations and then voted on in a second consensus round. Along with the adapted guideline indications, some methods of performing the first triage of patients and facilitating a teleconsultation preliminary to the first in-person visit were developed. Results After the revision of 161 documents, 13 papers were selected for analysis. From the papers, 19 clinical presentation items were collected; in total, 61 question items were extracted and voted on (i.e., for each presentation, more than one indication was provided from the literature). Two tables summarizing the PRT indications during the COVID-19 pandemic available from the literature (PRT COVID-19 summary tables) were developed: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. The consensus of the vote by the AIRO panel for the PRT COVID-19 summary was reached. The PRT COVID-19 summary tables for palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were adapted for clinical presentations possibly associated with patients in complex clinical scenarios other than the COVID-19 pandemic. The two new indication tables (i.e., “Normality model of PRT indications”) for both palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were voted on in a second consensus round. The consensus rate was reached and strong. Written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) were also developed, both in English and in Italian, to evaluate the patients for possible indications for PRT before scheduling clinical visits. Conclusion We provide a comprehensive summary of the literature guideline indications for PRT during COVID-19 pandemic. We also propose a clinical care model including clinical indications and written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) to evaluate the patients for indications of PRT before scheduling clinical visits. The normality model could facilitate the provision of PRT to patients in future complex logistic scenarios.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peihan Xie ◽  
Xiaodong Zhuang ◽  
Menghui Liu ◽  
Shaozhao Zhang ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundEchocardiography (Echo) is the primary imaging modality of infective endocarditis (IE). The recommendations on timing and mode selection of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are not fully in agreement among different guidelines, which can be confusing for clinical decision makers. Thus, we aimed to appraise the quality of recommendations by appraising the quality of guidelines. MethodsA search of guidelines published in English during 2007 to 2020 which contains recommendations of appropriate use of Echo in IE adult patients has been conducted. PPRAISAL OF GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH & EVALUATION II (AGREE II) instrument was applied independently by two reviews to assess the integrated quality of identified guidelines. The recommendations of concern were extracted from related chapters.ResultsA total of 9 guidelines meet the criteria with AGREE II score ranging from 36% to 79%, the domain of “stakeholder involvement” got the lowest score. According The most debatable issue is that under what circumstances has the repeated TEE for an initial positive TTE been necessary in suspected IE, the conflicting recommendations on it were presented along with relatively lower evidence level for hardly any related evidence based on.ConclusionsIn the 9 guidelines identified, the recommendations over the appropriate use of Echo are generally satisfying. Clinicians could take into account the guideline quality score when evaluating the recommendations for clinical decision making. More researches with high-grade evidence above the most controversial issues of whether a subsequent TEE is mandatory in uncomplicated native valve IE with an initial positive TTE are needed in the future.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peihan Xie ◽  
Xiaodong Zhuang ◽  
Menghui Liu ◽  
Shaozhao Zhang ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Echocardiography (echo) is the primary imaging modality for infective endocarditis (IE). However, the recommendations on timing and mode selection for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vary across guidelines, which can be confusing for clinical decision makers. In this case, we aim to appraise the quality of recommendations by appraising the quality of various guidelines.Methods A search of guidelines containing recommendations for the appropriate use of echo in adult IE patients published in English between 2007 and 2019 was conducted. The APPRAISAL OF GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH & EVALUATION II (AGREE II) instrument was applied independently by two reviewers to assess the integrated quality of the identified guidelines. The recommendations of concern are extracted from related chapters.Results A total of 9 guidelines met the criteria, with AGREE II scores ranging from 36% to 79%, and the domain of “stakeholder involvement” received the lowest score. The most contentious issue is whether a follow-up TEE is mandatory in uncomplicated native valve IE with an initial positive TTE. Conflicting recommendations are presented with a low evidence level based on little evidence.Conclusions In general, the recommendations proposed in the 9 identified guidelines on the appropriate use of echo are satisfying. The guideline quality score can be taken into account by the clinicians when evaluating the recommendations for clinical decisions. Additional studies with high evidence level should be conducted on the most controversial issues of whether a subsequent TEE is mandatory in uncomplicated native valve IE with an initial positive TTE.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peihan Xie ◽  
Xiaodong Zhuang ◽  
Menghui Liu ◽  
Shaozhao Zhang ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundEchocardiography (Echo) is the primary imaging modality of infective endocarditis (IE). However, the recommendations on timing and mode selection for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are not fully in agreement among different guidelines, which can be confusing for clinical decision makers. In this case, we aim to appraise the quality of recommendations by appraising the quality of guidelines. MethodsA search of guidelines containing recommendations for the appropriate use of Echo in IE adult patients published in English between 2007 and 2020 has been conducted. APPRAISAL OF GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH & EVALUATION II (AGREE II) instrument is applied independently by two reviewers to assess the integrated quality of identified guidelines. The recommendations of concern are extracted from related chapters.ResultsA total of 9 guidelines meet the criteria with AGREE II score ranging from 36% to 79%, and the domain of “stakeholder involvement” receives the lowest score. The most contentious issue is, whether a follow-up TEE is mandatory in uncomplicated native valve IE with initial positive TTE. And conflicting recommendations on it are presented with low evidence level for hardly any related evidence based on.ConclusionsIn general, the recommendations proposed in the 9 identified guidelines on the appropriate use of Echo are satisfying. And the guideline quality score could be taken into account by the clinicians when evaluating the recommendations for making clinical decision. More researches are needed in the future, which should be with high evidence level on the most controversial issues of whether a subsequent TEE is mandatory in uncomplicated native valve IE with an initial positive TTE.


Cartilage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arup K. Bhadra ◽  
Roy Altman ◽  
Vinod Dasa ◽  
Karen Myrick ◽  
Jeffrey Rosen ◽  
...  

Objective: A workgroup of clinical experts has developed an Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The increasingly broad and varied use of HA injections, lack of published clinical guidance, and limited coverage for their use has created the imperative to establish appropriateness criteria. Methods: The experts of this workgroup represent rheumatology, orthopedic surgery, physiatry, sports medicine, and nursing clinicians with substantive knowledge of intra-articular HA therapy. This workgroup utilized the results of a systematic review of evidence, expert clinical opinion, and current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to develop appropriateness criteria for the use of intra-articular HA for knee OA in 17 real-world clinical scenarios. Results: The workgroup scored the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6), or inappropriate (1-3). Six scenarios were scored as appropriate, 10 scenarios were scored as uncertain, and 1 scenario was scored as inappropriate. Conclusion: This article can assist clinicians in shared decision-making by providing best practices in considering HA injections for knee OA treatment. Moreover, this AUC article can aid payers and policy makers in determining reimbursement and preauthorization policies and more appropriately managing health care resources. It is clear that further research is still necessary—particularly in patient populations differentiated by OA severity—that may benefit the greatest from the use of HA injections for the treatment of knee OA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document