Depending on their origin, sedimentary phosphate
rocks (PRs) may differ in their P solubility, and, as a consequence, in their
agronomic effectiveness. The effect of six phosphate rocks (PR) - originating
from Algeria (ALG), North Florida (FLO), North Carolina (NCA), Senegal (SEN)
Morocco (MOR) and Hyperphosphate (HYP) with various P solubility (evaluated by
2% formic acid, 2% citric acid, and neutral ammonium citrate) - as well as
single superphosphate (SSP) and superphosphate + lime (SSP + Ca) (each P source
on 4 P levels, with doses of 0, 100, 400 and 1600 mg P
2
O
5
·kg
-1
soil) on the shoot yield of tillering stage spring barley, soil available
P (i.e. H
2
O, Olsen, Bray1, Lakanen-Erviö (LE) and ammonium lactate
(AL) extractable P contents) were studied in pot experiments set up with acidic
sandy soil (Nyírlugos, Hungary) and acidic clay loam soil (Ragály, Hungary),
both with low P supplies. The average
spring barley shoot yield at the beginning of shooting was 95% higher on the
colloid-rich acidic (pH
KCl
: 4.5) clay loam soil than on the
colloid-poor acidic (pH
KCl
: 3.8) sandy soil. The differences in the
solubility of phosphate rocks showed close correlation to the differences in P
responses. On both soils, the correlation between total PR-P added and P
responses in spring barley shoot yield was much weaker than that between
neutral ammonium citrate soluble PR-P added and P responses in spring barley
shoot yield. When phosphate rocks were applied as P sources, the comparison of
soil test P methods showed a different picture on the two soils. In the case of
the acidic sandy soil (Nyírlugos), the strongly acid LE-P (r² = 0.83) and
AL-P (r² =0.74) tests gave the highest correlation coefficients with
spring barley responses to P, while on the acidic clay loam soil (Ragály) these
were achieved by the Olsen-P (r² = 0.88) and Bray1-P (r² =0.88)
methods.