The changing benefits of global equity investing: Developed and emerging markets, 1997–2007

2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-362
Author(s):  
I. Magas

Are there any long standing benefits in international equity investing? Did the acceleration of global financial integration bring clearly measurable benefits to international equity investors? Is there a convergence of equity market profitability around the world? These are the main questions of this paper. All of these questions got an affirmative answer, but, as it may be immediately suspected, many durable qualifiers and caveats apply. Section 1 reviews some key propositions of modern investment theory and some recent evidence on the benefits of international asset allocation on equity markets. It is argued that the desired benefits — as predicted by theory — can be and have been captured in terms of better risk/return trade-offs due to international diversification of equity portfolios. Manifest benefits aside, however, many dampening factors come into play when considering long term capacities of realising these benefits. Mainly the changing correlation structure of global markets and the increased currency risk, which still remained very difficult to hedge, were identified as permanent factors to limit the power of international diversification in pushing out the efficient frontier of the equity set. Section 2 presents comparative evidence on global equity markets’ performance and gives an account of the wide variations in the US dollar denominated returns of major markets, developed and emerging. There is some support to the view that a certain convergence can be depicted in the profitability levels of different markets. Exchange rate movements, however, accounted for almost one third of variations in profitability on average. As of April 2007, stock market valuations did favour emerging markets (and to some extent EU-27) when compared to Japan or the US.

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saksham Mittal ◽  
Sujoy Bhattacharya ◽  
Satrajit Mandal

PurposeIn recent times, behavioural models for asset allocation have been getting more attention due to their probabilistic modelling for scenario consideration. Many investors are thinking about the trade-offs and benefits of using behavioural models over conventional mean-variance models. In this study, the authors compare asset allocations generated by the behavioural portfolio theory (BPT) developed by Shefrin and Statman (2000) against the Markowitz (1952) mean-variance theory (MVT).Design/methodology/approachThe data used have been culled from BRICS countries' major index constituents from 2009 to 2019. The authors consider a single period economy and generate future probable outcomes based on historical data in order to determine BPT optimal portfolios.FindingsThis study shows that a fair number of portfolios satisfy the first entry constraint of the BPT model. BPT optimal portfolio exhibits high risk and higher returns as compared to typical Markowitz optimal portfolio.Originality/valueThe BRICS countries' data were used because the dynamics of the emerging markets are significantly different from the developed markets, and many investors have been considering emerging markets as their new investment avenues.


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Arouri ◽  
Oussama M’saddek ◽  
Duc Khuong Nguyen ◽  
Kuntara Pukthuanthong

2004 ◽  
Vol 07 (08) ◽  
pp. 1031-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRENDAN O. BRADLEY ◽  
MURAD S. TAQQU

We investigate the portfolio construction problem for risk-averse investors seeking to minimize quantile based measures of risk. Using dependence measures from extreme value theory, we find that most international equity markets are asymptotically independent. We also find that the few cases of asymptotic dependence occur mostly in markets which are in close geographic proximity. We then examine how extremal dependence affects the asset allocation problem. Following the structure variable approach, we focus on the portfolio and model its tail in a manner consistent with extreme value theory. We then develop a methodology for asset allocation where the goal is to guard against catastrophic losses. The methodology is tested through simulations and applied to portfolios made up of two or more international equity markets. We analyze in detail three typical types of markets, one where the assets are asymptotically independent and the ratio of marginal risks is not constant, the second where the assets are asymptotically independent but the ratio of marginal risks are approximately constant and the third where the assets are asymptotically dependent and the ratio of marginal risks is not constant. The results are compared with the optimal portfolio under the assumption of normally distributed returns. Surprisingly, we find that the assumption of normality incurs only a modest amount of extra risk for all but the largest losses. We make the software written in support of this work freely available and describe its use in the appendix.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Sabilil Hakimi Amizuar ◽  
Anny Ratnawati ◽  
Trias Andati

The objective of this study is to analyze whether, despite the international equity liberalization and growing world financial integration, Indonesian investors can be beneficial from international diversification. The study covers both emerging markets (Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Korea, China, and Taiwan) and developed markets (USA, UK, Japan, Singapore, and Australia) over the period of January 1st, 2007 to April 30st, 2017. It uses several state-of-the-art techniques: multivariate cointegration and vector error correction models (VECM) with the analysis of impulse response function (IRF) and forecast error variance decomposition (FEVD) to analyze the long-term level of integration and time-varying correlations with the Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) aproach to analyze short term level of integration. The analysis provides the evidence of integration berween Indonesian market and international markets. The findings suggest that Indonesian investors have more chance to gain international diversification benefit from developed markets rather than emerging markets as the Indonesian market has low level of integration compared to developed markets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Opoku Amankwa ◽  
E. Kweinor Tetteh ◽  
G. Thabang Mohale ◽  
G. Dagba ◽  
P. Opoku

AbstractGlobal plastic waste generation is about 300 million metric tons annually and poses crucial health and environmental problems. Africa is the second most polluted continent in the world, with over 500 shipping containers of waste being imported every month. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report suggests that about 75% of this plastic waste ends up in landfills. However, landfills management is associated with high environmental costs and loss of energy. In addition, landfill leachates end up in water bodies, are very detrimental to human health, and poison marine ecosystems. Therefore, it is imperative to explore eco-friendly techniques to transform plastic waste into valuable products in a sustainable environment. The trade-offs of using plastic waste for road construction and as a component in cementitious composites are discussed. The challenges and benefits of producing liquid fuels from plastic waste are also addressed. The recycling of plastic waste to liquid end-products was found to be a sustainable way of helping the environment with beneficial economic impact.


2009 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Albuquerque ◽  
Gregory H. Bauer ◽  
Martin Schneider

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford Quisenberry ◽  
Benjamin Griffith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document