Constraint Effects on Cohesive Failures in Low-k Dielectric Thin Films

2005 ◽  
Vol 863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Y. Tsui ◽  
Andrew J. McKerrow ◽  
Joost J. Vlassak

AbstractOne of the most common forms of cohesive failure observed in brittle thin films subjected to a tensile residual stress is channel cracking, a fracture mode in which through-film cracks propagate in the film. The crack growth rate depends on intrinsic film properties, residual stress, the presence of reactive species in the environment, and the precise film stack. In this paper, we investigate the effect of various buffer layers sandwiched between a brittle carbon-doped-silicate (CDS) film and a silicon substrate on channel cracking of the CDS film. The results show that channel cracking is enhanced if the buffer layer is more compliant than the silicon substrate. Crack velocity increases with increasing buffer layer thickness and decreasing buffer layer stiffness. This is caused by a reduction of the constraint imposed by the substrate on the film and a commensurate increase in energy release rate. The degree of constraint is characterized experimentally as a function of buffer layer thickness and stiffness, and compared to the results of a simple shear lag model that was proposed previously.

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2266-2273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Y. Tsui ◽  
Andrew J. McKerrow ◽  
Joost J. Vlassak

One of the most common forms of cohesive failure observed in brittle thin film subjected to a tensile residual stress is channel cracking, a fracture mode in which through-film cracks propagate in the film. The crack growth rate depends on intrinsic film properties, residual stress, the presence of reactive species in the environments, and the precise film stack. In this paper, we investigate the effect of various buffer layers sandwiched between a brittle carbon-doped-silicate (CDS) film and a silicon substrate on channel cracking of the CDS film. The results show that channel cracking is enhanced if the buffer layer is more compliant than the silicon substrate. Crack velocity increases with increasing buffer layer thickness and decreasing buffer layer stiffness. This is caused by a reduction of the constraint imposed by the substrate on the film and a commensurate increase in energy release rate. The degree of constraint is characterized experimentally as a function of buffer layer thickness and stiffness, and compared to the results of a simple shear lag model that was proposed previously. The results show that the shear lag model does not accurately predict the effect of the buffer layer.


1994 ◽  
Vol 339 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Kistenmacher ◽  
S. A. Ecelberger ◽  
W. A. Bryden

ABSTRACTIntroduction of a buffer layer to facilitate heteroepitaxy in thin films of the Group IIIA nitrides has had a tremendous impact on growth morphology and electrical transport. While AIN- and self-seeded growth of GaN has captured the majority of attention, the use of AIN-buffered substrates for InN thin films has also had considerable success. Herein, the properties of InN thin films grown by reactive magnetron sputtering on AIN-buffered (00.1) sapphire and (111) silicon are presented and, in particular, the evolution of the structural and electrical transport properties as a function of buffer layer sputter time (corresponding to thicknesses from ∼50Å to ∼0.64 μm) described. Pertinent results include: (a) for the InN overlayer, structural coherence and homogeneous strain normal to the (00.1) growth plane are highly dependent on the thickness of the AIN-buffer layer; (b) the homogeneous strain in the AIN-buffer layer is virtually nonexistent from a thickness of 200Å (where a significant X-ray intensity for (00.2)AIN is observed); and (c) the n-type electrical mobility for films on AIN-nucleated (00.1) sapphire is independent of AIN-buffer layer thickness, owing to divergent variations in carrier concentration and film resistivity. These effects are in the main interpreted as arising from a competition between the lattice mismatch of the InN overlayer with the substrate and with the AIN-buffer layer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 262 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 456-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuantao Zhang ◽  
Guotong Du ◽  
Boyang Liu ◽  
HuiChao Zhu ◽  
Tianpeng Yang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 311 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Gao ◽  
Jiwei Zhai ◽  
Sangnian Song ◽  
Xihong Hao ◽  
Xi Yao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document