Effects of Buffer-layer Thickness and Active-layer Growth Temperature on ZnO Nanocrystalline Thin Films Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 739-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Young Leem ◽  
Byunggu Kim ◽  
Giwoong Nam ◽  
Youngbin Park ◽  
Hyunggil Park
Vacuum ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (9) ◽  
pp. 1373-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Su Kim ◽  
Do Yeob Kim ◽  
Min Young Cho ◽  
Giwoong Nam ◽  
Soaram Kim ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kareem M. Shoukri ◽  
Yaser M. Haddara ◽  
Andrew P. Knights ◽  
Paul G. Coleman ◽  
Mohammad M. Rahman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTSilicon-Germanium (SiGe) has become increasingly attractive to semiconductor manufacturers over the last decade for use in high performance devices. In order to produce thin layers of device grade SiGe with low concentrations of point defects and well-controlled doping profiles, advanced growth and deposition techniques such as molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) are used. One of the key issues in modeling dopant diffusion during subsequent processing is the concentration of grown-in point defects. The incorporation of vacancy clusters and vacancy point defects in 200nm SiGe/Si layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy over different buffer layers has been observed using beam-based positron annihilation spectroscopy. Variables included the type of buffer layer, the growth temperature and growth rate for the buffer, and the growth temperature and growth rate for the top layer. Different growth conditions resulted in different relaxation amounts in the top layer, but in all samples the dislocation density was below 106 cm−2. Preliminary results indicate a correlation between the size, type and concentration of vacancy defects and the buffer layer growth temperature. At high buffer layer growth temperature of 500°C the vacancy point defect concentration is below the PAS detectable limit of approximately 1015 cm−3. As the buffer layer growth is decreased to a minimum value of 300°C, large vacancy clusters are observed in the buffered layer and vacancy point defects are observed in the SiGe film. These results are relevant to the role played by point defects grown-in at temperatures below ∼350°C in modeling dopant diffusion during processing.


2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (11) ◽  
pp. 6880-6885 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. W. Lee ◽  
H. C. Chen ◽  
L. J. Chen ◽  
Y. H. Peng ◽  
C. H. Kuan ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Goo Kim ◽  
Seok Kyu Han ◽  
Dong-Suk Kang ◽  
Sang Mo Yang ◽  
Soon-Ku Hong ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 339 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Kistenmacher ◽  
S. A. Ecelberger ◽  
W. A. Bryden

ABSTRACTIntroduction of a buffer layer to facilitate heteroepitaxy in thin films of the Group IIIA nitrides has had a tremendous impact on growth morphology and electrical transport. While AIN- and self-seeded growth of GaN has captured the majority of attention, the use of AIN-buffered substrates for InN thin films has also had considerable success. Herein, the properties of InN thin films grown by reactive magnetron sputtering on AIN-buffered (00.1) sapphire and (111) silicon are presented and, in particular, the evolution of the structural and electrical transport properties as a function of buffer layer sputter time (corresponding to thicknesses from ∼50Å to ∼0.64 μm) described. Pertinent results include: (a) for the InN overlayer, structural coherence and homogeneous strain normal to the (00.1) growth plane are highly dependent on the thickness of the AIN-buffer layer; (b) the homogeneous strain in the AIN-buffer layer is virtually nonexistent from a thickness of 200Å (where a significant X-ray intensity for (00.2)AIN is observed); and (c) the n-type electrical mobility for films on AIN-nucleated (00.1) sapphire is independent of AIN-buffer layer thickness, owing to divergent variations in carrier concentration and film resistivity. These effects are in the main interpreted as arising from a competition between the lattice mismatch of the InN overlayer with the substrate and with the AIN-buffer layer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 262 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 456-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuantao Zhang ◽  
Guotong Du ◽  
Boyang Liu ◽  
HuiChao Zhu ◽  
Tianpeng Yang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document