scholarly journals Passionate and proactive: the role of the secondary principal in leading curriculum change 105

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Morrison ◽  
Beverley Cooper
2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Graves

This article examines curriculum from a social contextual perspective in which enactment – teaching and learning – is the central process, to which planning and evaluation contribute. It looks at the ways two kinds of contexts, target-language embedded and target-language removed, influence language curriculum planning and enactment. It provides a brief history of syllabus design and a rationale for moving beyond syllabus as the primary construct for curriculum planning. It then explores the classroom as the context of enactment and the role of the teacher as catalyst for curriculum change. It reconceptualizes the classroom as a learning community with potential links with real, virtual and imagined communities. It briefly explores integrated approaches to evaluation and assessment and concludes with examples of promising directions and suggestions for further research. Examples of practice that illustrate concepts are provided throughout the article.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 362
Author(s):  
Mina Saghaieh Bolghari ◽  
Arezoo Hajimaghsoodi

Despite the popularity of action research in the field of teacher education and professional development, not much is found regarding the role of action research in language curriculum development. This lack of interest may stem from the dominance of top-down approach over curriculum development in some EFL contexts where no special place is given to the local needs and wants. This paper starts with the definition and some basic characteristics of action research and then follows with a brief overview of its origins as well as different types. How action research can make changes in a curriculum is discussed next. Then it looks at the role action research may play in creating positive changes in teachers’ roles in curriculum development. Some of the challenges of implementing action research are mentioned later. Finally, the paper ends with some guidelines for teachers to make improvements as a result of conducting action research.


1993 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 80-82
Author(s):  
Judy Sherrington

The measure of mathematics anxiety most widely used in screening and as a before and after measure to evaluate the impact of interventions is the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) devised by Suinn, Edie, Nicoletti, and Spinelli (1972). Alexander and Cobb (1987), Hunsley (1987), Richardson and Suinn (1972), Trent and Fournet (1987), Hadfield and Maddux (1988), Ferguson (1986), and Dew, Galassi and Galassi (1984), have used it; Wigfield and Meece (1988) refer to it as the most frequently used measure of mathematics anxiety; and Englehard (1990) recommends its use by future researchers. It was given qualified approval in a review by Hannafin (1985), and though Knapp's review (1985) was rather negative, he does concede that it has little or no competition.Suinn and Edwards (1982) produced a version of the scale for adolescents (MARS-A). As noted by Hannafin (1985), it is virtually indistinguishable from the original, the differences involving minor and infrequent word substitutions.According to Suinn (1979, p.2):The MARS-A can be used to screen individual students in order to plan their placements in special mathematics courses, provide counseling, or provide for intervention through programs such as desensitization for anxiety. Typically, a value above the 75% level would indicate the student is eligible for attention of this type, however a school may wish to develop its own norms or cut-off scores.The MARS-A can also be used as a measure for evaluating programs. It could be administered prior to a new counseling program or curriculum change, and readministered later to determine the effects of the program. Finally, the MARS-A may be used as a part of direct research on mathematics anxiety. For example, it would be a useful measure in studies which examine the role of curriculum content, parental characteristics, extracurricular activities, etc., influencing mathematics anxiety.


Author(s):  
Camilla Gåfvels ◽  
Viveca Lindberg

This article explores how craft practice is theorised through sketching, by comparing narratives about the role of sketching from interviewed Swedish upper secondary textile design and floristry education teachers, and aiming to discern connection to curriculum. The theory and methods used in the article are influenced by Ivor Goodson’s work on subject knowledge and curriculum change (1998). Empirical data was obtained from multiple sources, including interviews with four teachers. The findings reveal that, while sketching has been intrinsic to textile design and seamstress vocational knowing for considerable time, sketching is a relatively new phenomenon within floristry vocational knowing and education; essentially dating from the 2011 Swedish educational reform. The discussion claims that sketching provides means to theorise craft practice, through providing an intermediary level between the abstract (theory) and the concrete (objects) within the practice


2003 ◽  
Vol 87 (634) ◽  
pp. 26-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca H. Goodwin ◽  
Michael L. Cunningham ◽  
Ronald Childress

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document