scholarly journals A Simulation-Based Resource for Improving Patient Safety and Improving the Patient Experience

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren Otis ◽  
Lynn Sweeney ◽  
Adam Rojek ◽  
David Lindquist
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Dombrádi ◽  
Klára Bíró ◽  
Guenther Jonitz ◽  
Muir Gray ◽  
Anant Jani

PurposeDecision-makers are looking for innovative approaches to improve patient experience and outcomes with the finite resources available in healthcare. The concept of value-based healthcare has been proposed as one such approach. Since unsafe care hinders patient experience and contributes to waste, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how the value-based approach can help broaden the existing concept of patient safety culture and thus, improve patient safety and healthcare value.Design/methodology/approachIn the arguments, the authors use the triple value model which consists of personal, technical and allocative value. These three aspects together promote healthcare in which the experience of care is improved through the involvement of patients, while also considering the optimal utilisation and allocation of finite healthcare resources.FindingsWhile the idea that patient involvement should be integrated into patient safety culture has already been suggested, there is a lack of emphasis that economic considerations can play an important role as well. Patient safety should be perceived as an investment, thus, relevant questions need to be addressed such as how much resources should be invested into patient safety, how the finite resources should be allocated to maximise health benefits at a population level and how resources should be utilised to get the best cost-benefit ratio.Originality/valueThus far, both the importance of patient safety culture and value-based healthcare have been advocated; this paper emphasizes the need to consider these two approaches together.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 80-88
Author(s):  
Nermin Ocaktan ◽  
Yasemin Uslu ◽  
Merve Kanıg ◽  
Vesile Unver ◽  
Ukke Karabacak

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia Dreiher ◽  
Olga Blagorazumnaya ◽  
Ran Balicer ◽  
Jacob Dreiher

Abstract Background The quality of healthcare in Israel is considered “high”, and this achievement is due to the structure and organization of the healthcare system. The goal of the present review is to describe the major achievements and challenges of quality improvement in the Israeli healthcare system. Body In recent years, the Ministry of Health has made major strides in increasing the public’s access to comparative data on quality, finances and patient satisfaction. Several mechanisms at multiple levels help promote quality improvement and patient safety. These include legislation, financial incentives, and national programs for quality indicators, patient experience, patient safety, prevention and control of infection and accreditation. Over the years, improvements in quality indicators, infection prevention and patient satisfaction can be demonstrated, but other fields show little change, if at all. Challenges and barriers include reluctance by unions, inconsistent and unreliable flow of information, the fear of overpressure by management and the loss of autonomy by physicians, and doubts regarding “gaming” of data. Accreditation has its own challenges, such as the need to adjust it to local characteristics of the healthcare system, its high cost, and the limited evidence of its impact on quality. Lack of interest by leaders, lack of resources, burnout and compassion fatigue, are listed as challenges for improving patient experience. Conclusion Substantial efforts are being made in Israel to improve quality of care, based on the use of good data to understand what is working and what needs particular attention. Government and health care providers have the tools to continue to improve. However, several mechanisms for improving the quality of care, such as minimizing healthcare disparities, training for quality, and widespread implementation of the “choosing wisely” initiative, should be implemented more intensively and effectively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. e17
Author(s):  
Team Leader: Kimberly Potts ◽  
Team Members: Staci Eguia ◽  
Mahroz Mohammed

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 917-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Torrie ◽  
David Cumin ◽  
Janie Sheridan ◽  
Alan F Merry

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S3-S7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H Pucher ◽  
Robyn Tamblyn ◽  
Daniel Boorman ◽  
Mary Dixon-Woods ◽  
Liam Donaldson ◽  
...  

The use of simulation-based training has established itself in healthcare but its implementation has been varied and mostly limited to technical and non-technical skills training. This article discusses the possibilities of the use of simulation as part of an overarching approach to improving patient safety, and represents the views of the Simnovate Patient Safety Domain Group, an international multidisciplinary expert group dedicated to the improvement of patient safety. The application and integration of simulation into the various facets of a learning healthcare system is discussed, with reference to relevant literature and the different modalities of simulation which may be employed. The selection and standardisation of outcomes is highlighted as a key goal if the evidence base for simulation-based patient safety interventions is to be strengthened. This may be achieved through the establishment of standardised reporting criteria. If such safety interventions can be proven to be effective, financial incentives are likely to be necessary to promote their uptake, with the intention that up-front cost to payers or insurers be recouped in the longer term but reductions in complications and lengths of stay.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Barr ◽  
Kylie Readman ◽  
Peter Dunn

Paramedics entering the professional workforce continually make judgements of their own and their peers’ performances. With little exposure to these processes, exercising these judgements is difficult. Teaching strategies that use self-assessment, peer assessment and reflective practice should improve the acquisition of clinical reasoning and application of clinical skills (1-4). However, clinical programs such as paramedic programs, present unique challenges in the development and assessment of clinical skills, because allowing undergraduate paramedic students to work with autonomy beyond their ability presents considerable risk to patient safety. The results of this pilot project indicate that changing a simulation-based clinical assessment (SCA) from a standalone assessment to a strategy encouraging student engagement through a focus on active learning rather than on passive teaching, have facilitated deeper understanding and developed desired attributes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document