scholarly journals An Integrated Practical Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum, Critical Appraisal: Therapy

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maribeth Chitkara ◽  
Rachel Boykan
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Based Medicine

Assessing the FACTTS: An Evidence-Based Medicine and Critical Appraisal Course for Medical Students

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. W. Cyrus ◽  
David C. Duggar ◽  
Deidra Woodson ◽  
Donna F. Timm ◽  
Jerry W. McLarty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Based Medicine

Evidence-Based Medicine

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Winslow
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Reporting Guidelines ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Treatment Benefits ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
History Of ◽  
Evidence Based Surgery ◽  
Key Resources ◽  
Based Medicine

Descriptions of “evidence-based” approaches to medical care are now ubiquitous in both the popular press and medical journals. The term evidence-based medicine (EBM) was first coined in 1992, and over the last two decades, the field has experienced rapid growth, and its principles now permeate both graduate medical education and clinical practice. The field of EBM has been in constant evolution since its introduction and continues to undergo refinements as its principles are tested and applied in a wide variety of clinical circumstances. This review presents a brief history of EBM, EBM: fundamental tenets, a critical appraisal of a single study, reporting guidelines for single studies, a critical appraisal of a body of evidence, evidence-based surgery, and limitations in EBM. Tables list strength of evidence for treatment decisions (EBM working group), Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine revised levels of evidence for treatment benefits , “4S” approach to finding resources for EBM, critical appraisal of individual studies examining therapeutic decisions, reporting guidelines by study design, and key resources for evidence-based surgery. This review contains 6 tables and 85 references

A critical appraisal of 'evidence-based medicine' in allergy and asthma

Allergy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (s78) ◽  
pp. 12-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bousquet ◽  
P. Van Cauwenberge
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Allergy And Asthma

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management, Part I: Introduction and General Considerations

2008 ◽  
Vol 2;11 (3;2) ◽  
pp. 161-186
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Interventional Pain Management ◽  
Based Medicine

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines are part of modern interventional pain management. As in other specialties in the United States, evidence-based medicine appears to motivate the search for answers to numerous questions related to costs and quality of health care as well as access to care. Scientific, relevant evidence is essential in clinical care, policy-making, dispute resolution, and law. Consequently, evidence based practice brings together pertinent, trustworthy information by systematically acquiring, analyzing, and transferring research findings into clinical, management, and policy arenas. In the United States, researchers, clinicians, professional organizations, and government are looking for a sensible approach to health care with practical evidence-based medicine. All modes of evidence-based practice, either in the form of evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, or guidelines, evolve through a methodological, rational accumulation, analysis, and understanding of the evidentiary knowledge that can be applied in clinical settings. Historically, evidence-based medicine is traceable to the 1700s, even though it was not explicitly defined and advanced until the late 1970s and early 1980s. Evidence-based medicine was initially called “critical appraisal” to describe the application of basic rules of evidence as they evolve into application in daily practices. Evidence-based medicine is defined as a conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. Evidence-based practice is defined based on 4 basic and important contingencies, which include recognition of the patient’s problem and construction of a structured clinical question, thorough search of medical literature to retrieve the best available evidence to answer the question, critical appraisal of all available evidence, and integration of the evidence with all aspects and contexts of the clinical circumstances. Systematic reviews provide the application of scientific strategies that limit bias by the systematic assembly, critical appraisal, and synthesis of all relevant studies on a specific topic. While systematic reviews are close to meta-analysis, they are vastly different from narrative reviews and health technology assessments. Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements that aim to help physicians and patients reach the best health care decisions. Appropriately developed guidelines incorporate validity, reliability, reproducibility, clinical applicability and flexibility, clarity, development through a multidisciplinary process, scheduled reviews, and documentation. Thus, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines represent statements developed to improve the quality of care, patient access, treatment outcomes, appropriateness of care, efficiency and effectiveness and achieve cost containment by improving the cost benefit ratio. Part 1 of this series in evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management provides an introduction and general considerations of these 3 aspects in interventional pain management. Key words: Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, narrative reviews, health technology assessments, grading of evidence, recommendations, grading systems, strength of evidence.

Evidence-based medicine

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Wiffen ◽  
Marc Mitchell ◽  
Melanie Snelling ◽  
Nicola Stoner
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Clinical Pharmacy ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Continuous Data ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Standardized Mean Difference ◽  
Based Medicine

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) and clinical pharmacy 126Statistical versus clinical significance 128Odds ratios and relative risk 130Binary and continuous data 132L’Abbé plots 133Mean difference and standardized mean difference 134Assessing the quality of randomized studies 136Critical appraisal of systematic reviews ...

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document