Migration of Atlantic Salmon Postsmolts in Relation to Habitat Use in a Coastal System

2004 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 1455-1471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles L. Lacroix ◽  
Paul McCurdy ◽  
Derek Knox
2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (7) ◽  
pp. 2242-2247 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. Johnson ◽  
M. T. Tinker ◽  
J. A. Estes ◽  
P. A. Conrad ◽  
M. Staedler ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 1543-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin G Whalen ◽  
Donna L Parrish

We completed 22 night snorkeling surveys between November and March 1995-1997 to quantify Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr habitat use relative to habitat availability in the Rock River, Vermont, U.S.A. On average, post-young-of-the-year (PYOY) parr selected greater water depths in winter than young-of-the-year (YOY) parr, whereas YOY and PYOY parr both selected water velocities ([Formula: see text]19 cm/s) that were significantly lower than random measurements (46 cm/s). Maturity of PYOY parr had no significant influence on habitat selection. The majority of YOY and PYOY parr at night were found in contact with the stream bottom resting on silt-sand or gravel substrates in velocity dead-zone habitats created by the stream edge or depositional habitats created by midstream rocks and boulders. The strong selection that nocturnal Atlantic salmon parr exhibit for low water velocity areas in winter indicates the importance of maintaining large instream cover that provides refuges from high flows. The similarity that YOY and PYOY parr exhibited in many elements of habitat selection suggests that both stages may be similarly susceptible to habitat limitations in winter.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 2163-2171
Author(s):  
Shad K Mahlum ◽  
Knut W Vollset ◽  
Bjørn T Barlaup ◽  
Gaute Velle ◽  
Tore Wiers
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gus Wathen ◽  
Joseph Zydlewski ◽  
Stephen M. Coghlan ◽  
Joan G. Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole L. Hill ◽  
Jessamine R. Trueman ◽  
Ashlee D. Prévost ◽  
Dylan J. Fraser ◽  
William R. Ardren ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sánchez-Hernández ◽  
M. J. Servia ◽  
R. Vieira-Lanero ◽  
F. Cobo

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 582 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva C. Enders ◽  
Keith D. Clarke ◽  
Curtis J. Pennell ◽  
L. M. Neil Ollerhead ◽  
David A. Scruton

2003 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefán Ó Steingrímsson ◽  
James W.A Grant

The literature on stream fish movement offers diverse views on the patterns (restricted vs. nonrestricted), causes (competition vs. habitat use), and consequences (mobile fish of lower vs. equal fitness) of movement. We tagged 320 young-of-the-year Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) (30.1–55.3 mm), using relatively noninvasive tagging (elastomers) and recovery (snorkeling) techniques, to test these alternative views. Most fish (mean = 63.8%) stayed in the study sites (10–120 m) throughout their respective study season (28–74 days). Of the resighted fish, 61.8% moved less than 1 m up- or down-stream and only three fish moved more than 10 m, causing extremely leptokurtic movement curves. Movement and site fidelity were weakly affected by habitat use and competition. Fish originally found in slow water moved farther than fish from fast water, whereas fish found at high population densities were more likely to disappear than fish from low densities. Finally, mobile fish grew as fast or faster than more sedentary fish, supporting the idea that movement can be advantageous and is not just a by-product of density-dependent population regulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document