scholarly journals The Explanatory Power of Structural Realism in the 21st Century: the Eastern Partnership, Russian Expansionism and the War in Ukraine

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-204
Author(s):  
Maciej Herbut ◽  
◽  
Renata Kunert-Milcarz ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 296-323
Author(s):  
Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu ◽  
Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos

These days, employability and sustainability in the Romanian marketplace are seriously challenged by the general economic development conditions, the continuously rising living standards, and the unfortunate imbalance and irregularities in the policies of labor markets. These defining factors mirror in this current research that focuses on describing the importance, implications, and specificities of human resource management (HRM) and strategic human resource management in the 21st-century organizational landscape, while seeking to pinpoint the considerable and valuable benefits brought by human and intellectual capital as drivers for performance management at the organizational level. The results of the study themselves possess the explanatory power of showing that human resources are the main assets of the organization, which decisively determines the potential for present and future line of action, since human resources have unlimited growth and development potential, even though they are regarded as extremely rare, highly valuable, yet difficult to insure or replace.


1993 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Huth ◽  
Christopher Gelpi ◽  
D. Scott Bennett

Realism has been the dominant paradigm in the study of international conflict. Within this paradigm, two leading alternative approaches have been deterrence theory and structural realism. We test the relative explanatory power of these two theoretical approaches on the escalation of deterrence encounters among great powers from 1816 to 1984. We derive a set of hypotheses from each model, operationalize them for systematic empirical analysis, and test the hypotheses on 97 cases of great-power deterrence encounters by means of probit analysis. The results are that the hypotheses derived from deterrence theory receive considerable support, whereas none of the hypotheses derived from structural realism are supported.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 24-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria D. Kellum ◽  
Sue T. Hale

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 400-400
Author(s):  
Mark R. Young ◽  
Andrew R. Bullock ◽  
Rafael Bouet ◽  
John A. Petros ◽  
Muta M. Issa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document