scholarly journals Safety and interaction of direct oral anticoagulants with antiarrhythmic drugs

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 4482
Author(s):  
B. A. Tatarsky ◽  
N. V. Kazyonnova

The use of direct oral anticoagulants minimized the risks associated with vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) therapy. Currently, direct oral anticoagulants have priority over warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and a number of other conditions requiring anticoagulant therapy. Direct oral anticoagulants along with antiarrhythmic therapy are the accepted strategy for atrial fibrillation treatment. At the same time, the effect of drug-drug interactions (DDI) between direct oral anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic drugs, which have common points of metabolic application, has not been fully elucidated. In order to provide effective and safe anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with AF, it is important to understand the mechanisms and severity of DDI of direct oral anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic agents. This review discusses the issues of DDI of direct oral anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic drugs used to treat atrial fibrillation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Dmitry A. Napalkov ◽  
◽  
Anastasiya A. Sokolova ◽  
Alena I. Skripka ◽  
◽  
...  

This publication is devoted to the tactics of management of patients with atrial fibrillation during the pandemic of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Among the key issues of relevance during this period, we thought it possible to consider the epidemiology, prevalence, and pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation in patients with COVID-19, as well as treatment strategies with regard to obvious hospitalization, rhythm control/restoration and prevention of thromboembolic events. A separate issue is the tactics regarding the prescription or continuation of therapy aimed at the prevention of thromboembolic events and possible drug interactions in patients treated for COVID-19 and receiving anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Keywords: atrial fibrillation, COVID-19, thromboembolic events, anticoagulant therapy For citation: Napalkov DA, Sokolova AA, Skripka AI. Features of the management of patients with atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic: current questions and possible answers, Consilium Medicum. 2021; 23 (1): 32–34. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2021.1.200669


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1162-1162
Author(s):  
Desirée Campoy ◽  
Gonzalo Artaza ◽  
César A Velasquez ◽  
Tania Canals ◽  
Erik A Johansson ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, falls, multifactorial anemia and concomitant polypharmacy. These factors in elderly patients predisposes to both thromboembolic and bleeding events once atrial fibrillation occurs. Therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in older populations is crucial. Despite recent increases in DOAC use in NVAF, there are still limited data regarding DOACs effectiveness and safety in frail elderly patients. AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in a cohort of elderly patients with NVAF. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2019, we consecutively included NVAF elderly patients (≥80 years-old) treated with DOAC or VKA in a prospective multicenter registry. Demographic, laboratory, frailty risk stratification and antithrombotic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum FU of 6 months. VKA patients had a standard FU through digital international normalized ratio (INR) control and the efficacy of therapy was determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) values from the preceding 6 months of treatment using Rosendaal's method. FU in DOAC patients was performed through structured and integral assessment following the Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving DOAC (Olivera et al, Med Clin 2018). Key practical management aspects are listed in the flow chart (Figure 1). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS score) was assigned to each patient at the beginning and during the FU; patients were classified into three categories: non-frail (CFS 1-4), mild-to-moderately frail (CFS 5-6), and severely frail (CFS 7-9). RESULTS From a total of 1040 NVAF patients, 690 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (61 dabigatran, 95 rivaroxaban, 254 edoxaban and 280 apixaban) and 350 with VKA. In the VKA group, the mean TTR was 52.8%. Demographic characteristics and CFS score are summarized in table 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median FU: 16.5 months) showed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism among VKA patients vs DOAC patients (4.2 vs 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, p<0.001). Major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly infrequent compared with VKA group (2.2 vs 8.9 events, p=0.001). In the DOAC group, 90% (n=20/22) of the major bleedings were gastrointestinal [16 rivaroxaban and 4 edoxaban]. However, in the VKA group 64% (n = 20/31) were gastrointestinal, 25.8% (n= 8/31) intracranial and 9.7% (n = 3/31) urogenital bleedings. We identified 365 very elderly patients (aged ≥ 90 years) of which 270 (39.1%) were DOAC patients and 95 (27.1%) VKA patients. In this subgroup of patients, after a multivariate regression analysis, the stroke/systemic embolism incidence was similar in both treatment groups regardless of the age, but major bleeding decreased significantly in DOAC group (adjusted HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.091-0.664). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that DOACs can be a good therapeutic option for stroke/systemic embolism prevention in frail elderly patients, showing low rates of stroke as well as bleeding events when a structured and integral FU is applied to anticoagulated patients. Further investigations are necessary to analyze the impact in the quality of life and net clinical benefit of anticoagulant therapy when a FU program is applied in elderly patients. Disclosures Sierra: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.


Kardiologiia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 68-79
Author(s):  
L. V. Popova ◽  
T. B. Kondratieva ◽  
M. B. Aksenova ◽  
T. V. Khlevchuk ◽  
M. Z. Kanevskaya

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) – direct oral anticoagulants – are getting the ever-broadening use in clinical practice. However, many problems related to optimal use of NOACs in specific clinical situations remain unresolved. European Heart Rhythm Association in April 2018 issued the renovated recommendations on the use of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation. The authors of recommendations presented some specific clinical variants for which they formulated practical advices based on the evidence obtained in randomized clinical trials. They also outlined the indications for use of NOACs, formulated practical start-program and scheme of subsequent follow-up management of patients taking NOACs. Recommendations contain information on pharmacokinetics of NOACs and their interactions with other drugs, consideration of feasibility of NOACs use in patients with chronic renal insufficiency or advanced liver disease. Many other practical problems are covered as well.  


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C Perino ◽  
Krishna Pundi ◽  
Jun Fan ◽  
Susan K Schmitt ◽  
Mitra Kothari ◽  
...  

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are guideline-recommended over warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, patients who are DOAC eligible are commonly maintained on warfarin. We sought to evaluate bleeding risk and prediction while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Veteran Affairs health care system. We included patients with a prescription for warfarin and/or DOAC from 10/1/2010 to 9/30/2017 with an AF encounter in the 90 days prior to 30 days after prescription. We categorized DOAC treated patients as warfarin-naïve or -experienced and performed an on-treatment analysis to determine bleeding incidence and HAS-BLED score discrimination. In adjusted analyses, we compared risk of bleeding while treated with DOAC (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) to warfarin. Results: The analysis cohort included 99,143 patients treated with warfarin (71±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.6±1.2) and 73,732 and 26,760 patients treated with DOAC who were warfarin-naïve (74±10 years, HAS-BLED 2.4±1.0) and -experienced (71±9 years, HAS-BLED 2.8±1.1), respectively. DOAC patients with warfarin experience had more prior bleeds (DOAC, warfarin-experienced: 11.9%; DOAC, warfarin-naïve: 4.5%; warfarin: 6.2%; p<0.001 for both). Risk of intracranial bleeding was substantially lower while on DOAC treatment (both for warfarin-naïve and -experienced patients) as compared to warfarin ( Table ). HAS-BLED discrimination for bleeding outcomes, intracranial or any bleeding, was modest ( Table ). Conclusion: DOAC treatment had a favorable safety profile compared to warfarin treatment, even for DOAC treated patients with warfarin-experience who had more prior bleeds. These data argue against maintaining DOAC eligible patients on warfarin therapy regardless of HAS-BLED score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document