scholarly journals Painful temporomandibular disorders, self reported tinnitus, and depression are highly associated

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 943-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovana Fernandes ◽  
Daniela Aparecida de Godoi Goncalves ◽  
Jose Tadeu Tesseroli de Siqueira ◽  
Cinara Maria Camparis
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Causal Relationship ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the association among painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD), self reported tinnitus, and levels of depression. Method The sample consisted of 224 individuals with ages ranges from 18 to 76 years. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I were used to classify TMD and Axis II were used for self reported tinnitus, and to score the levels of depression. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied. Results The presence of painful TMD without tinnitus was significantly associated with moderate/severe levels of depression (OR=9.3, 95%; CI: 3.44-25.11). The concomitant presence of painful TMD and tinnitus self-report increased the magnitude of the association with moderate/severe levels of depression (OR=16.3, 95%; CI, 6.58-40.51). Conclusion Painful temporomandibular disorders, high levels of depression, and self reported tinnitus are deeply associated. However, this association does not imply a causal relationship.

scholarly journals Biopsychosocial factors of Axis II of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders in individuals with muscular temporomandibular disorder and migraine

Revista Dor ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Branco Battistella ◽  
Thatiana Bastos Guimarães ◽  
Camila Leite Quaglio ◽  
Mariana Brandão Ferreira-Cabrini ◽  
Dinamar Aparecida Gaspar-Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorder ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

Tinnitus in Temporomandibular Disorders: Axis I and Axis II Findings According to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-272
Author(s):  
Eitan Mijiritsky ◽  
Ephraim Winocur ◽  
Alona Emodi-Perlman ◽  
Pessia Friedman-Rubin ◽  
Ehab Dahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Axis I

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of Myotherapy in Patients with Myofascial Pain with and without Self-Reported Sleep Bruxism Using The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Gałczyńska-Rusin ◽  
Małgorzata Pobudek-Radzikowska ◽  
Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska ◽  
Zofia Maciejewska-Szaniec ◽  
Krzystof Gawriołek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Sleep Bruxism ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

scholarly journals Prävalenz kraniomandibulärer Dysfunktionen bei Senioren – symptombezogene Analysen bei jüngeren und älteren Senioren

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Rauch ◽  
Cäcilie Angrik ◽  
Andreas Zenthöfer ◽  
Sophia Weber ◽  
Sebastian Hahnel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Kraniomandibuläre Dysfunktionen ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Kraniomandibuläre Dysfunktionen (CMD) können auch im hohen Alter auftreten. Die Prävalenz von CMD-Symptomen bei Senioren wurde bisher nur wenig untersucht. Ziel der Arbeit Ziel dieser Untersuchung war es, die Prävalenz von Symptomen einer CMD bei Senioren nach Befunderhebung mit den Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) zu bestimmen. Dabei sollten die Prävalenzwerte von jüngeren (60 bis 74 Jahren) und älteren (≥ 75 Jahre) Senioren verglichen werden. Material und Methoden Im Rahmen der Interdisziplinären Längsschnittstudie des Erwachsenenalters (ILSE) wurden Probanden nach repräsentativen Gesichtspunkten rekrutiert. Während der vierten Nachverfolgungswelle im Zeitraum von 2014 bis 2016 im Bereich des Studienzentrums Leipzig wurden die Probanden auf das Vorliegen von anamnestischen und klinischen CMD-Symptomen untersucht. Ergebnisse Anamnestische CMD-Symptome bei Senioren (n = 192) waren v. a. durch Schmerzen im Gesichtsbereich (13,0 %) gekennzeichnet. Das häufigste klinische CMD-Symptom waren Kiefergelenkgeräusche mit einer Prävalenz bis zu 35,5 %. Frauen gaben anamnestisch häufiger Kopfschmerzen/Migräne an. Kiefergelenkgeräusche und eine limitierte Mundöffnung wurden klinisch häufiger bei weiblichen Teilnehmenden beobachtet. Statistisch signifikante Unterschiede zeigten sich bei dem Vergleich von jüngeren und älteren Senioren hinsichtlich der Prävalenz von Kopfschmerzen/Migräne, jedoch nicht bei klinischen Symptomen. Schlussfolgerung Anamnestisch werden Gesichtsschmerzen von 13,0 % der Senioren angegeben. Kiefergelenkgeräusche werden bei jedem dritten Älteren klinisch beobachtet. CMD-Symptome scheinen bei jüngeren und älteren Senioren im ähnlichen Maße ausgeprägt zu sein.

Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD): interexaminer reliability of the Finnish version of Axis I clinical diagnoses

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 493-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Leskinen ◽  
T. Suvinen ◽  
T. Teerijoki-Oksa ◽  
P. Kemppainen ◽  
R. Näpänkangas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Clinical Diagnoses ◽  
Interexaminer Reliability ◽  
Axis I

scholarly journals Quality of life in young and middle age adult temporomandibular disorders patients and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Bozzetti Pigozzi ◽  
Duziene Denardini Pereira ◽  
Marcos Pascoal Pattussi ◽  
Carmen Moret-Tatay ◽  
Tatiana Quarti Irigaray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Aims To compare the difference in the quality of life between temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients and non-TMD subjects diagnosed with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) or the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Methods Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) databases were searched in studies published in English and Portuguese. The search was performed by two independent reviewers in duplicate. A manual search and the gray literature were also included. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that used the RDC/TMD axis I and quality of life with standard questionnaires in young and middle-aged adult population (18–55 years). The data were analyzed quantitatively by combining the results in a meta-analysis using forest plots. The measure of effect used was the standardized mean difference (SMD) in depression levels. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. The initial search included 806 articles without duplications. Results Twenty-four articles were included in the final systematic review. Of these, 9 were included in the meta-analysis, where it was shown a statistically significant in all axis I groups: (a) global TMD—groups I, II and III combined, N = 3829, SMD (95% CI) = 1.06 (0.65–1.51), p = 0.000; (b) group I—muscle disorders, N = 3,056, SMD (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.45–1.18), p = 0.000; (c) group II—disc displacements, N = 3,184, SMD (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.26–0.91), p = 0.000; and (d) group III—arthralgia/arthritis/arthrosis, N = 2781, SMD (95% CI) = 0.98 (0.59–1.36), p = 0.000. When compared to controls. Conclusions Quality of life is affected in all axis I TMD patients, especially in groups I and III with higher pain intensity and disability as compared to group II.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document