Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings

2011 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Manfredini ◽  
Luca Guarda-Nardini ◽  
Ephraim Winocur ◽  
Fabio Piccotti ◽  
Jari Ahlberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

scholarly journals Quality of life in young and middle age adult temporomandibular disorders patients and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Bozzetti Pigozzi ◽  
Duziene Denardini Pereira ◽  
Marcos Pascoal Pattussi ◽  
Carmen Moret-Tatay ◽  
Tatiana Quarti Irigaray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Aims To compare the difference in the quality of life between temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients and non-TMD subjects diagnosed with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) or the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Methods Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) databases were searched in studies published in English and Portuguese. The search was performed by two independent reviewers in duplicate. A manual search and the gray literature were also included. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that used the RDC/TMD axis I and quality of life with standard questionnaires in young and middle-aged adult population (18–55 years). The data were analyzed quantitatively by combining the results in a meta-analysis using forest plots. The measure of effect used was the standardized mean difference (SMD) in depression levels. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. The initial search included 806 articles without duplications. Results Twenty-four articles were included in the final systematic review. Of these, 9 were included in the meta-analysis, where it was shown a statistically significant in all axis I groups: (a) global TMD—groups I, II and III combined, N = 3829, SMD (95% CI) = 1.06 (0.65–1.51), p = 0.000; (b) group I—muscle disorders, N = 3,056, SMD (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.45–1.18), p = 0.000; (c) group II—disc displacements, N = 3,184, SMD (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.26–0.91), p = 0.000; and (d) group III—arthralgia/arthritis/arthrosis, N = 2781, SMD (95% CI) = 0.98 (0.59–1.36), p = 0.000. When compared to controls. Conclusions Quality of life is affected in all axis I TMD patients, especially in groups I and III with higher pain intensity and disability as compared to group II.

scholarly journals Painful temporomandibular disorders, self reported tinnitus, and depression are highly associated

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 943-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovana Fernandes ◽  
Daniela Aparecida de Godoi Goncalves ◽  
Jose Tadeu Tesseroli de Siqueira ◽  
Cinara Maria Camparis
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Causal Relationship ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Axis Ii ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the association among painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD), self reported tinnitus, and levels of depression. Method The sample consisted of 224 individuals with ages ranges from 18 to 76 years. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I were used to classify TMD and Axis II were used for self reported tinnitus, and to score the levels of depression. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied. Results The presence of painful TMD without tinnitus was significantly associated with moderate/severe levels of depression (OR=9.3, 95%; CI: 3.44-25.11). The concomitant presence of painful TMD and tinnitus self-report increased the magnitude of the association with moderate/severe levels of depression (OR=16.3, 95%; CI, 6.58-40.51). Conclusion Painful temporomandibular disorders, high levels of depression, and self reported tinnitus are deeply associated. However, this association does not imply a causal relationship.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of Myotherapy in Patients with Myofascial Pain with and without Self-Reported Sleep Bruxism Using The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Gałczyńska-Rusin ◽  
Małgorzata Pobudek-Radzikowska ◽  
Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska ◽  
Zofia Maciejewska-Szaniec ◽  
Krzystof Gawriołek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Sleep Bruxism ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

scholarly journals Prävalenz kraniomandibulärer Dysfunktionen bei Senioren – symptombezogene Analysen bei jüngeren und älteren Senioren

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Rauch ◽  
Cäcilie Angrik ◽  
Andreas Zenthöfer ◽  
Sophia Weber ◽  
Sebastian Hahnel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Kraniomandibuläre Dysfunktionen ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Kraniomandibuläre Dysfunktionen (CMD) können auch im hohen Alter auftreten. Die Prävalenz von CMD-Symptomen bei Senioren wurde bisher nur wenig untersucht. Ziel der Arbeit Ziel dieser Untersuchung war es, die Prävalenz von Symptomen einer CMD bei Senioren nach Befunderhebung mit den Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) zu bestimmen. Dabei sollten die Prävalenzwerte von jüngeren (60 bis 74 Jahren) und älteren (≥ 75 Jahre) Senioren verglichen werden. Material und Methoden Im Rahmen der Interdisziplinären Längsschnittstudie des Erwachsenenalters (ILSE) wurden Probanden nach repräsentativen Gesichtspunkten rekrutiert. Während der vierten Nachverfolgungswelle im Zeitraum von 2014 bis 2016 im Bereich des Studienzentrums Leipzig wurden die Probanden auf das Vorliegen von anamnestischen und klinischen CMD-Symptomen untersucht. Ergebnisse Anamnestische CMD-Symptome bei Senioren (n = 192) waren v. a. durch Schmerzen im Gesichtsbereich (13,0 %) gekennzeichnet. Das häufigste klinische CMD-Symptom waren Kiefergelenkgeräusche mit einer Prävalenz bis zu 35,5 %. Frauen gaben anamnestisch häufiger Kopfschmerzen/Migräne an. Kiefergelenkgeräusche und eine limitierte Mundöffnung wurden klinisch häufiger bei weiblichen Teilnehmenden beobachtet. Statistisch signifikante Unterschiede zeigten sich bei dem Vergleich von jüngeren und älteren Senioren hinsichtlich der Prävalenz von Kopfschmerzen/Migräne, jedoch nicht bei klinischen Symptomen. Schlussfolgerung Anamnestisch werden Gesichtsschmerzen von 13,0 % der Senioren angegeben. Kiefergelenkgeräusche werden bei jedem dritten Älteren klinisch beobachtet. CMD-Symptome scheinen bei jüngeren und älteren Senioren im ähnlichen Maße ausgeprägt zu sein.

Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD): interexaminer reliability of the Finnish version of Axis I clinical diagnoses

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 493-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Leskinen ◽  
T. Suvinen ◽  
T. Teerijoki-Oksa ◽  
P. Kemppainen ◽  
R. Näpänkangas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Clinical Diagnoses ◽  
Interexaminer Reliability ◽  
Axis I

scholarly journals Low-level laser therapy for temporomandibular disorders (tmd) treatment: a systematic review of randomized trials

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 376
Author(s):  
Priscila Leite ◽  
Nicole Melo ◽  
Pâmela Silva ◽  
Robinsom Montenegro ◽  
Paulo Bonan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Significant Difference

AIM: Conducting a systematic review of randomized clinical trials focusing on the efficacy of LLLT on pain control in patients with TMD, diagnosed by the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Search was performed at PubMed/MEDLINE database with the terms: (1) “Laser AND temporomandibular disorders”; (2) “Laser AND temporomandibular disorders AND RDC/TMD”; (3) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular disorders”; (4) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular disorders AND RDC/TMD”; (5) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular joint dysfuntion syndrome”; (6) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular joint dysfuntion syndrome AND RDC/TMD”; (7) “Laser AND temporomandibular joint dysfuntion syndrome” (8) “Laser AND RDC/TMD”; (9) “Low-level laser therapy AND RDC/TMD”. Inclusion criteria: articles need to be randomized clinical trial performed in humans; evaluate the effect of LLLT in the treatment of TMD diagnosed by the use of RDC/TMD; published in English or Portuguese in the last 10 years. Protocol studies and pilot studies were excluded. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. The type of laser used was Gallium Aluminum Arsenide (GaAlAs) diode, with exception of 1 paper, which used super pulsed Gallium Arsenide laser. Eight studies reported decreased in pain levels, in two articles there was no statistically significant difference between test and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: In most studies, LLLT was effective in pain remission, but there is no standardization in parameters like wavelength, output power and frequency. Studies with more complex experimental designs, standardized diagnostic criteria for TMD and defined protocols for the use of LLLT are needed to determine its efficacy in the treatment of TMD.

scholarly journals Associação entre a sintomatologia dolorosa e a disfunção temporomandibular

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wyllka Cyntya Galvão da Silva ◽  
Karolinne Domingos Medeiros ◽  
Eloisa Cesário Fernandes ◽  
Sandja Gabriela Oliveira ◽  
Caio Rodrigues Maia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorder ◽  
Epidemiologic Study ◽  
Masticatory Muscles ◽  
Degenerative Disorders ◽  
International Conference On Bioinformatics ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

Introdução: A Disfunção Temporomandibular (DTM) é um quadro patológico que afeta o sistema estomatognático e, frequentemente, acompanhada de dor. Objetivos: Aferir o nível de dor dos pacientes portadores de DTM e a prevalência de sintomatologia articular e muscular. Percebeu-se que a relação entre a origem da DTM e a sintomatologia dolorosa é pouco relatada na literatura. Materiais e Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, observacional de corte transversal, desenvolvido com 30 pacientes com DTM, diagnosticado pelo Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). A amostra foi determinada pelas estimativas de atendimento. A associação entre a sintomatologia e a origem da DTM foram verificadas através do teste qui-quadrado, com intervalos de confiança (95%). Foi usada uma ficha clínica para a coleta de dados com idade, gênero e nível da dor, que foi aferido através da Escala Visual Analógica de dor. Resultados: Constatou-se que 26 pacientes eram do sexo feminino e 4 do sexo masculino. Quinze apresentaram idade inferior a 36,5 anos, e os outros uma idade superior a esta. Quanto a origem da DTM, 19 tinham desordem articular e 11 muscular. A categoria moderada foi o nível mais prevalente, seguida do intenso. Determinou-se que não houve associação estatisticamente significante entre as variáveis deste estudo com a DTM. Conclusão: Constatou-se que, os fatores etiológicos analisados isoladamente não influenciam de forma única no desenvolvimento da DTM, mas poderão atuar em conjunto com outros fatores, já que a sua causa é multifatorial.Descritores: Dimensão Vertical; Boca Edêntula; Dor Facial; Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular.ReferênciasDworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992;6(4):301-55.Gonçalves DAG, Bigal ME, Jales LCF, Camparis CM, Speciali JG. Headache and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: an epidemiologic study. Headache. 2010;50(2):231-41.Piccin CF, Pozzebon D, Chiodelli L, Boufleus J, Pasinato F, Corrêa ECR. Aspectos clínicos e psicossociais avaliados por critérios de diagnóstico para disfunção temporomandibular. Revista Cefac. 2016;18(1):113-19.Winocur E, Emodi-Perlman A. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: myths and scientific evidences. in: Orthodonthics-basis aspects and clinical considerations. In Tech. 2012.Jorge JMS, Dini C, Santos L, Camara de Bem SH, Custodio W. Associação entre dimensão vertical de oclusão e transtornos temporomandibulares. ClipeOdonto – UNITAU. 2016;8(1):44- 50.Bayma PTC, Feltrin PP, Dias CAS, Costa JF, Laganá DC, Inoue RT. Temporomandibular disorders in otolaryngology patients. RGO (Porto Alegre). 2010;58(3):313-17.Martinez JE, Grassi DC, Marques LG. Análise da aplicabilidade de três instrumentos de avaliação de dor em distintas unidades de atendimento: ambulatório, enfermaria e urgência. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011;51(4):299-308.Slade GD, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, Fillingim RB, Bair E, Sanders AE et al. Painful temporomandibular disorder: decade of discovery from OPPERA studies. J Dental Res. 2016; 95(10):1084-92.Rauhala K., Oikarinen KS, Raustia AM. Role of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in facial pain: occlusion, muscle and TMJ pain. Cranio. 1999;17(4):254-61.Manfredini D, Favero L, Gregorini G, Cocilovo F, Guarda-Nardini L. Natural course of temporomandibular disorders with low painrelated impairment: a 2-to-3-year follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(6):436-42.Freitas LS. Associação da disfunção Temporomandibular com o polimorfismo 102T-C do gene receptor da serotonina HTR2A [tese]. São José do Rio Preto: Faculdade de Medicina do São José do Rio Preto – FAMERP; 2011.Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG. Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res. 2008;87(4):296-307.Lopes PRR, Campos PSF, Nascimento RJM. Dor e inflamação nas disfunções temporomandibulares: revisão de literatura dos últimos quatro anos. R Ci med biol. 2011;10(3):317-25.Wang X, Guo H, Wang Y, Yi X. The effects of estrogen on cytoplasmic ca2+ concentration of masticatory muscles myoblast in acid condition. 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE); 10-12 May 2011; Wuhan, China. Anais. Disponível em http://www.icbbe.org/2011/Proceeding2010.aspx.Cairns BE. Pathophysiology of TMD Pain—Basic Mechanisms and Their Implications for pharmacotherapy. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37(6):391-410.Portinho CP, Razera MV, Splitt BI, Gorgen ARH, Faller GJ, Collares MVM. Apresentação clínica inicial em pacientes com disfunção Temporomandibular. Rev Bras Cir Craniomaxilofac. 2012;15(3):109-12.

scholarly journals PREVALENCE OF OTOLARYNGOLOGICAL SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS- A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 780-782
Author(s):  
Annie Susan Thomas ◽  
◽  
Ariel Hannah Philip ◽  
Philip Oommen ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Muscular Disorder ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Ear Symptoms ◽  
Research Diagnostic Criteria

Aim:To investigate the prevalence of otolaryngological symptoms with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) in TMD patients. Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional study, the sample consisted of 172 TMD patients, both males and females of 18-59 years. Diagnosis of TMD was based on Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC-TMD) Axis 1. The prevalence of otolaryngological symptoms was determined using questionnaire. Results: Of the 172 TMD patients evaluated, 81 patients were having Muscular disorder alone or combined with Intracapsular disorder. Out of the 81 patients having muscular disorder, 74 had ear symptoms (91.4%). Conclusion: A high prevalence (91.4%) of Otolaryngological symptoms with TMD was found in the present study. Ruling out causes of ear symptoms other than TMD by an ENT specialist is essential before proceeding with the treatment of these category of patients for a better prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document