scholarly journals Evaluation of two methods for mixed dentition analysis using the method error

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-167
Author(s):  
Bruna Santos da Cruz ◽  
Eduardo Kant Colunga Rothier ◽  
Beatriz de Souza Vilella ◽  
Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella ◽  
Rizomar Ramos do Nascimento
Author(s):  
A. Keerthika ◽  
J. Jeevarathan ◽  
Ponnudurai Arangannal ◽  
M. Vijayakumar ◽  
S. Amudha ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana de Aguiar Bulhões Galvão ◽  
Gladys Cristina Dominguez ◽  
Sérgio Thomaz Tormin ◽  
Alex Akamine ◽  
André Tortamano ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Moyers analysis is widely used for analyzing mixed dentition, however, the accuracy of its theoretical probability tables has been recently questioned. Taking into consideration the fact the mixed dentition analysis is of paramount importance to precisely determine the space needed for alignment of canines and premolars, this research aimed at objectively assessing in the literature such an important step for orthodontic diagnosis. METHODS: A computerized search involving articles published on PubMed and Lilacs between 1990 and September, 2011 was conducted in accordance with the method described in the Cochrane 5.1.0 handbook. RESULTS: The research resulted in a sample composed of 629 articles. The inclusion criteria were: Articles using the Moyers analysis with a sample greater or equal to 40 patients. Conversely, the exclusion criteria were: Dental casts of patients with syndromes or oral cleft, researches conducted with a literature review, only, or clinical case reports and researches conducted before 1990. For this systematic review, 19 articles were selected. CONCLUSION: Based on the literature available, we can conclude that the Moyers mixed dentition analysis must be carefully used, since the majority of the articles analyzed showed that the probability of 75% was not as accurate as expected, leading to the need of adapting the probability levels depending on the study population.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-220
Author(s):  
Jorge J. Pavani Carrillo ◽  
Maria C. Rubial ◽  
Cristina Albornoz ◽  
Silvina Villalba ◽  
Patricia Damiani ◽  
...  

Introduction: The Moyers’ probability tables are used in mixed dentition analysis to estimate the extent of space required for the alignment of canines and premolars, by correlating the mesiodistal size of lower incisors with the size of permanent canines and premolars. Objective: This study intended to evaluate the applicability of the Moyer's probability tables for predicting the mesiodistal space needed for the correct location of premolars and permanent canines non-erupted, in adolescents of the city of Cordoba, Argentina, who show different facial biotypes. Materials and Methods: Models and tele-radiographies of 478 adolescents of both genders from 10 to 15 years of age were analyzed. The tele-radiographies were measured manually in order to determine the facial biotype. The models were scanned with a gauged scanner (HP 3670) and measured by using Image Pro Plus 4.5 software. Results: According to this study, the comparison between the Moyer´s probability table, and the table created at the National University of Córdoba (UNC) (at 95%, 75%, and 50%) shows that, in both tables, a higher value of mesiodistal width of lower incisors corresponds to a bigger difference in the space needed for permanent canines and premolars; being the need for space for permanents canines and premolars bigger in the UNC´s table. On the other hand, when contrasting the values of mesiodistal space for permanent canines and premolars associated with each facial biotype, the discrepancies between groups were not statistically significant (P >0.05). However, we found differences in the size of the space required according to the mesiodistal width range of the lower incisors for each biotype: a) The comparison of lower-range values, with a mesialdistal width of lower incisors less than 22 mm, the space required for permanent canines and premolars resulted smaller in patients with dolichofacial biotype than in patients with mesofacial and braquifacial biotypes. The latter biotypes have meager differences between them. b) The comparison of mid-range values, with a mesialdistal width of lower incisors from 22 to 25 millimeters, shows that the values of required alignment space are similar in the three facial biotypes. c) Finally, the comparison of upper range values, with a mesialdistal width of lower incisors greater than 25 millimeters, indicates that the space required for dolichofacial biotypes tends to be higher than in mesofacial and brachyfacial biotypes. Conclusion: The Moyer´s probability tables should be created to meet the needs of the population under study, with no consideration of patients’ facial biotypes.


1969 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousef H. Al-Dlaigan, ◽  
Nasser D. Alqahtani ◽  
Khalid Almoammar ◽  
Thikriat Al-Jewair, ◽  
Fahad Salamah, ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
NaveenKumar Kommineni ◽  
AvulaKishore Kumar ◽  
Chowdavaram VenkatSubba Reddy ◽  
Dappili SwamiRanga Reddy ◽  
Maram VinayChand Reddy ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iman Ibrahim ◽  
Mona Abdullah Elkateb ◽  
Nadia Aziz Wahba ◽  
Nadia El Harouny

Objective: Treatment planning in the mixed dentition is important for proper tooth alignment. A mixed dentition analysis, should accurately predict the mesiodistal widths of unerupted permanent teeth. The aim of the present study was to determine which sum of mesiodistal widths (MDW) of permanent teeth will be the best predictor for MDW of unerupted permanent canines and premolars. Study Design: The study was conducted on 102 Egyptians, 51 males and 51 females, mean age 16.7±0.5 years with fully erupted permanent teeth, and intact proximal surfaces. Dental casts were obtained and scanned to produce digital images that were used on a specially designed software program to measure the MDW of permanent teeth. Casts were divided into training and validation sets, where 9 models of tooth combinations were used to develop a regression equation that describes the relation between them and sum of MDW of erupted maxillary or mandibular canines, first and second premolars. The validation set was used to test the accuracy of the proposed equation. Results: R2 of regression models ranged from 0.3 (for models #2,4,5 and 8) to 0.36 for model #1. The highest regression in model #1 (sum of MDW of lower first permanent molars and upper central incisors) indicated a high linear association between the sum of MDW of tooth combination model #1 and the MDW of maxillary and mandibular permanent canines and premolars. There was no significant difference between the actual and the predicted MDW, when the proposed equation was checked for its accuracy in the entire validation set (p>0.05). Conclusion: The combination of the sums of lower permanent first molars and upper permanent central incisors was the best predictor for the MDW of both maxillary and mandibular permanent canines and premolars.The newly proposed prediction equation may be considered clinically useful for mixed dentition analysis in Egyptian subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document