scholarly journals Objective criteria for assessment of the quality of dental restorations improve student’s critics towards the treatment assignment: a randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
Brenda MARMENTINI ◽  
Monique Vendruscolo CAROSSI ◽  
Larissa Luane Soder HENTZ ◽  
Sinval Adalberto RODRIGUES-JUNIOR
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Practical Training ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Dental Restorations ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction Objective parameters may help the decision of how to manage existing dental restorations in patients. Objective This study tested the following hypotheses: i) teaching objective criteria to dental students enhances their criticism toward the indication for replacement of dental restorations; and ii) a complementary practical approach enhances the proportion of correctly indicated treatments compared with a strictly theoretical approach. Method This block-randomized controlled trial involved dental students from a Brazilian university who were randomized to either a didactic/theoretical class group (A, control) or a didactic/theoretical class followed by practical training (group B); both conditions were applied in a moodle-based environment. The proportion of correctly indicated interventions before and after teaching the criteria was compared with using Mann–Whitney U-test (p<0.05), and a comparison between the approaches was established with Wilcoxon test (p<0.05). Result The baseline proportion of correct assignments significantly increased after interventions for both groups (p=0.02), with no significant difference between the interventions (p=0.871). Conclusion The proposed online training enhanced the proportion of correct assignments to restorations, confirming the first study hypothesis. The second hypothesis was rejected because differences between the strategies had no effect on the proportion of correct answers. Focusing on teaching objective criteria for assessment of the quality of restorations would enhance students’ ability to correctly treat them.

scholarly journals Matrix-Augmented Bone Marrow Stimulation With a Polyglycolic Acid Membrane With Hyaluronan vs Microfracture in Local Cartilage Defects of the Femoral Condyles: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712092293
Author(s):  
Johannes Glasbrenner ◽  
Wolf Petersen ◽  
Michael J. Raschke ◽  
Matthias Steiger ◽  
René Verdonk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Polyglycolic Acid ◽  
Tissue Formation ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Microfracture (MF) is an established operative treatment for small, localized chondral defects of the knee joint. There is evidence from animal studies that matrix augmentation of bone marrow stimulation (m-BMS) can improve the quality of the repair tissue formation. Purpose: To evaluate the therapeutic outcome of a matrix made of polyglycolic acid and hyaluronan as compared with a conventional MF technique. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients between the ages of 18 and 68 years who had an articular femoral cartilage defect of 0.5 to 3 cm2 in the weightbearing area of the femoral condyles with indication for MF were included in this study. Patients were randomized and treated with either MF or m-BMS with Chondrotissue. Defect filling, as assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), at postoperative 12 weeks was defined as the primary outcome measure, with follow-up MRI at weeks 54 and 108. Follow-up data were also collected at 12, 54, and 108 weeks after surgery and included patient-reported clinical scores: visual analog scale for pain, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Results: MRI scans confirmed cartilage repair tissue formation in both groups 12 weeks after treatment. There was no significant difference between the m-BMS and MF groups in the percentage of defect filling at 12, 54, and 108 weeks postoperatively. No significant difference was found in terms of patient-reported clinical scores. Both groups showed significant improvement in 4 KOOS subscales—Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life—at 54 and 108 weeks after treatment. Conclusion: This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing m-BMS with a polyglycolic acid matrix with hyaluronan with MF. The use of the Chondrotissue implant in m-BMS has been proven to be a safe procedure. No difference was found between m-BMS and MF in terms of patient-reported outcome scores and MRI assessment until postoperative 2 years. Long-term follow-up studies including histological assessment are desirable for further investigation. Registration: EUCTR2011-003594-28-DE (EU Clinical Trials Register).

scholarly journals Effectiveness of acupuncture, ozonio therapy and low-intensity laser in the treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction of muscle origin: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Síglia Adriana Campos TORTELLI ◽  
Leonardo SARAIVA ◽  
Daniela Cristina MIYAGAKI
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Ozone Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction One of the most common causes of orofacial pain is temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of acupuncture, ozone therapy and laser therapy in the treatment of muscle TMD patients through a randomized controlled trial. Material and method Twelve professors and postgraduate students from the University of Passo Fundo, diagnosed with TMD, aged between 23 and 50 years old, of both sexes, were evaluated. Individuals were randomly divided into 3 groups: G1: laser therapy, G2: acupuncture, and G3: ozone therapy. TMD diagnostic questionnaires (RDC / TMD), Quality of Life Questionnaire (OHIP-14), Pain Scale (VAS) and maximum mouth opening were applied. Descriptive statistics and percentage were used for sample characterization, which were presented using absolute and relative frequency distributions. Qualitative variables were analyzed with Wilcoxon tests p≤0.05. Result There was no statistically significant difference between treatments. Regarding pain and maximum mouth opening, the groups showed no statistical difference when individually analyzed, but when compared in general, they did (p=0.002 and p=0.003). Conclusion It can be considered that all treatments were able to decrease pain and improve maximal opening capacity related to muscle TMD. It can also be concluded that the TMD-related quality of life, in relation to the pain variable, was generally effective when compared before and after the interventions.

scholarly journals Home-based Palliative Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in Children with Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murti Andriastuti ◽  
Pricilia G Halim ◽  
Elnino Tunjungsari ◽  
Dwi P Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Children With Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: In these last few years, an integrated approach between palliative care (PC) and chronic and/or life-threatening conditions care have been widely used. Home-based PC service is developed to meet the needs of the patients at home, but hasn’t been applied widely. This study is aimed to determine the benefit of integrated home-based PC in the quality of life (QOL) and symtomps intensity of Indonesian children with malignancies. Method: A randomized controlled trial to compare the quality of life between patients who were given PC (a 3-month home visit) and those who were not (intervention vs control group) was conducted, each group containing 30 children with cancer aged 2-18 years old who were consulted to palliative team. Participants were randomly assigned into each group. In the first and twelfth week of the intervention, all patients were assessed with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQLTM) questionnaire cancer module 3.0 (report by proxy or self-report). Symptoms intensity (pain, anorexia, sleep disturbance) were scored by using Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale (ESAS). Mean score and each dimension score of both group were compared and analyzed using bivariate analysis. Results: A total 50 participants were included in analysis. Significant difference was found between two groups with average total score in control group 62.39 and intervention group 81.63 (p<0.001). In the intervention group QoL tends to improve, whereas in the control group, those did not get palliative intervention, quality of life tends to decrease as the disease progress. The most improved aspect in QoL is pain and nausea (p<0.001), followed by procedural anxiety (p=0.002), treatment anxiety (p=0.002), and worry (p=0.014). Palliative intervention was found to be able to reduce sleep disturbances (p=0.003) and anorexia (p<0.001) significantly. Conclusion: Home-based PC improved several aspects of the QOL and provide better symptoms management of children with malignancies. An early intervention concurrent with the underlying treatment is believed to be able to improve their quality of life. Trial Registration: This study has been retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04067687 (August, 22nd 2019).

scholarly journals Impact of an educational programme on Alzheimer’s disease patients’ quality of life: results of the randomized controlled trial THERAD

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Villars ◽  
Christelle Cantet ◽  
Eva de Peretti ◽  
Amelie Perrin ◽  
Maria Soto-martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Educational Programme ◽  
The Self ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Although educational interventions are recommended in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), studies assessing the impact of interventions such as “therapeutic patient education” are scarce. Indeed, the intrinsic nature of the disease is considered a barrier to patients’ involvement in such approaches. We aimed to evaluate an intervention by using a “dyadic” approach (patient and caregiver) in both intervention and assessment. Methods THERAD is a monocentric, randomized, controlled trial assessing the effects of a 2-month educational programme in mild to moderately severe AD patients among 98 dyads (caregiver/patient) on caregiver-reported patient quality of life (QOL) at 2 months. Community-dwelling patients and their caregivers were recruited in ambulatory units of the French Toulouse University Hospital. Self-reported patient QOL, autonomy, behavioural and psychological symptoms and caregiver QOL and burden were collected at 2, 6 and 12 months. Linear mixed models were used in modified intention-to-treat populations. We also performed sensitivity analysis. Results A total of 196 dyads were included, 98 in each group. The mean age of the patients was 82 years, 67.7% were women, diagnosed with AD (+/- cerebrovascular component) (mean MMSE =17.6), and 56.9% lived with a partner. The mean age of the caregivers was 65.7 years, and 64.6% were women (52.3% offspring/42.6% spouses), with a moderate burden (mean Zarit score = 30.9). The mean caregiver-reported patient QOL was lower than the self-reported QOL (28.61 vs. 33.96). We did not identify any significant difference in caregiver-reported patients’ QOL (p = 0.297) at 2 months, but there was a significant difference in self-reported patients’ QOL at 2 months (p = 0.0483) or 6 months (p = 0.0154). No significant difference was found for the secondary outcomes. The results were stable in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions This randomized controlled trial assessing an educational intervention in 196 dyads (Alzheimer’s disease affected patient/caregiver) highlights the need to better consider the patient’s point of view, since only the self-reported QOL was improved. Additional studies using this dyadic approach are necessary in targeted subpopulations of caregivers (spouse vs. child, gender) and of patients (severity of cognitive impairment or behavioural disturbances) Trial registration THERAD study NCT01796314. Registered on February 19, 2013.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document