Risk factors for vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonisation in critically ill patients

AbstractPatient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is commonly encountered during mechanical ventilation of critically ill patients. Estimates of PVA incidence vary widely. Type, risk factors, and consequences of PVA remain unclear. We aimed to measure the incidence and identify types of PVA, characterize risk factors for development, and explore the relationship between PVA and outcome among critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to medical, surgical, and medical-surgical intensive care units in a large academic institution staffed with varying provider training background. A single center, retrospective cohort study of all adult critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 12 h. A total of 676 patients who underwent 696 episodes of mechanical ventilation were included. Overall PVA occurred in 170 (24%) episodes. Double triggering 92(13%) was most common, followed by flow starvation 73(10%). A history of smoking, and pneumonia, sepsis, or ARDS were risk factors for overall PVA and double triggering (all P < 0.05). Compared with volume targeted ventilation, pressure targeted ventilation decreased the occurrence of events (all P < 0.01). During volume controlled synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure targeted ventilation, ventilator settings were associated with the incidence of overall PVA. The number of overall PVA, as well as double triggering and flow starvation specifically, were associated with worse outcomes and fewer hospital-free days (all P < 0.01). Double triggering and flow starvation are the most common PVA among critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Overall incidence as well as double triggering and flow starvation PVA specifically, portend worse outcome.

Download Full-text

Prevalence and risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (COVID-D): a multicentre cohort study

The Lancet Respiratory Medicine ◽

10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30552-x ◽

2021 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Brenda T Pun ◽

Rafael Badenes ◽

Gabriel Heras La Calle ◽

Onur M Orun ◽

Wencong Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Multicentre Cohort Study ◽

Multicentre Cohort

Download Full-text

Recovery of Both Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusFrom Culture of a Single Clinical Specimen From Colonized or Infected Patients

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/593957 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 30 (2) ◽

pp. 130-138 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Sang Hoon Han ◽

Bum Sik Chin ◽

Han Sung Lee ◽

Su Jin Jeong ◽

Hee Kyung Choi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Clinical Specimen ◽

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

University Hospital ◽

Cell Contact ◽

Patient Risk ◽

Clinical Specimens ◽

Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽

Vancomycin Resistant

Objective.To describe the incidence of recovery of both vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) from culture of a single clinical specimen, to describe the clinical characteristics of patients from whom these specimens were recovered, and to identify the risk factors of these patients.Design.A retrospective cohort and case-control study.Setting.A tertiary care university hospital and referral center in Seoul, Korea.Methods.We identified 61 case patients for whom a single clinical specimen yielded both VRE and MRSA on culture, and 122 control patients for whom any clinical specimen yielded only VRE on culture. The control patients were selected by matching 2 :1 with the case patients for age, sex, and first date of sampling that led to isolation of VRE or both VRE and MRSA among 1,536 VRE-colonized patients from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2006. To identify patient risk factors for the recovery of both VRE and MRSA in a single clinical specimen, we performed univariate comparisons between the 2 groups and then multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results.The incidence of recovery of both VRE and MRSA from culture of a single clinical specimen was 3.97% (for 61 of 1,536 VRE-colonized patients) over 4 years. Among these 82 single clinical specimens, the most common type was wound specimens (26.8%), followed by lower respiratory tract specimens (18.3%), urine specimens (17.1%), and catheter tips (15.9%). Of the 61 case patients, 14 (23.0%) had 2 or more single clinical specimens that yielded both VRE and MRSA on culture, and the longest interval from the first sampling that yielded both organisms to the last sampling that yielded both was 174 days. Independent patient risk factors for the presence of both VRE and MRSA in a single clinical specimen were chronic renal disease (odds ratio [OR], 7.00;P= .012), urinary catheterization (OR, 3.36;P= .026), and longer total cumulative duration of hospital stay within the previous year (OR, 1.03;P< .001).Conclusion.We confirmed that the recovery of VRE and MRSA from a single clinical specimen occurs continually. Because prolonged cell-to-cell contact can facilitate transfer ofvanA,close observation and surveillance for vancomycin-resistantS. aureus, especially among patients with risk factors for the recovery of both VRE and MRSA from a single clinical specimen, should be continued.

Download Full-text