scholarly journals Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1215-1223
Author(s):  
Salvador Vilar Correia Lima ◽  
Evandilson Guenes Campos de Barros ◽  
Fabio de Oliveira Vilar ◽  
Flavia Cristina Morone Pinto ◽  
Thomé Décio Pinheiro Barros ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
P. S. Kyzlasov ◽  
M. M. Sokol’shchik ◽  
N. A. Goncharov ◽  
S. V. Porowski ◽  
V. P. Sergeev ◽  
...  

This article provides a clinical example of the simultaneous implantation of an artificial sphincter of the bladder and a triple-component prosthesis of the penis, which allows almost completely to rehabilitate a patient with total incontinence and erectile dysfunction after laparoscopic radical prostatectom y for prostate cancer. The urgency of writing this article was a high incidence of prostate cancer, which has no tendency to decrease.It should be noted that when choosing the optimal method for treating prostate cancer, it is necessary to take into account the stage of the disease development, the patient’s age, concomitant diseases, possible complications, test results, and the wishes of the patient. In the stages of prostate cancer T1T2, radical prostatectomy in any of its embodiments, openly laparoscopically or with the help of a robot is a routine operation, at stage T3, in order to achieve an acceptable result, it is necessary not only sufficient surgical technique, but the correct preoperative preparation (the use of hormone therapy).One of the frequent complications of radical prostatectomy at stage T3 is urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, which is caused by the need for more “aggressive” techniques, the frequency of which reaches, in the opinion of different authors, 30 to 90%. With incontinence after a radical prostatectomy of moderate and severe degree, the implantation of an artificial urethral sphincter remains the preferred method of treatment. Artificial sphincter allows you to fully control the process of retention of urine and urination. Note that the restoration of potency after surgery is a very difficult problem. After the operation, one of the methods of preserving the erectile function is the early administration of 5fosofodiesterase inhibitors, but their reception does not always allow to maintain the erectile function, in this case, patients can be rehabilitated by penile implantation. The installation of a three-component phalloprosthesis or artificial sphincter separately is already a routine operation, but simultaneous treatment of two com plications and sim ultaneous im plantation of two prostheses is a rarity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Llorens ◽  
Tobias Pottek

Study Design This is a retrospective, non-randomised study. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter ZSI 375 inserted in male patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods Between May 2009 and January 2017, 45 men with SUI underwent ZSI 375 device insertion. Operations were performed in two French centres by one surgeon. Complications and pad used to manage continence were recorded. Results From May 2009 to January 2012, 45 patients with a mean age of 70.42 years underwent placement of the ZSI 375 device in France. The most common cause for incontinence was radical prostatectomy (RP, 33/45 ­patients, 73.33%). The minimal period of incontinence was 6 months. Twenty-seven out of 45 patients (60.00%) had a severe incontinence (at least four pads per day), 13 patients (28.89%) had moderate incontinence (three pads per day) and five patients (11.11%) had two pads per day. With a long follow-up, the ZSI 375 device was considered to be successful in 73.33% patients after 5 years (60 months) and 72% of patients after 7 years (84 months). The infection rate was 2.2 % affecting one in 45 patients. Six out of 45 patients presented a urethral erosion (13.33%). Mechanical failure with a revision occurred in three patients (6.67%). Conclusions The ZSI 375 device is a safe and effective device to treat severe SUI in men.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document