Budget Execution in Health

10.1596/36583 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz Piatti-Funfkirchen ◽  
Helene Barroy ◽  
Fedja Pivodic ◽  
Federica Margini
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-63
Author(s):  
Serhii YUSHKO ◽  

The article examines the indicators on the basis of which the budget execution in Ukraine is assessed. Budget revenues and expenditures are characterized. The paper demonstrates the features of calculating the budget deficit (surplus) in Ukraine before and after 2004 year, emphasizing that despite the special place of this indicator in the budget planning system, for various reasons for a number of years there was neglect of current regulations legislation and world experience in budget deficit management. It is emphasized the imperfection of the budget deficit indicator due to its inherent shortcomings, concluding that the absolute value of the budget deficit is important in connection with another indicator – budget financing. The components of budget financing are named and characterized. It was found that the most important role in the context of balancing the main budget of the state belongs to debt operations. It is demonstrated the relationship between indicators of budget deficit and financing (their modular values are the same), revenues and expenditures (identical provided the balances at the beginning and end of the reporting period), net borrowing and the amount of public debt (the value of the latter increases / decreases by the amount net borrowing). The examples of specific budget years demonstrate the facts of exceeding the total amount of funding (budget deficit) by net borrowings of the state; the conclusion about the significance of the indicator of net borrowings in assessing the state of public finances is drawn; the need for further search for ways to improve the quality of budget management, thoughtful borrowing planning, the implementation of active budget operations with securities is stressed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (163) ◽  
pp. 555-573
Author(s):  
Diana-Sabina BRANET (ULICI) ◽  
◽  
Camelia-Daniela HATEGAN ◽  

The financial indicators reported in the budget execution accounts of the local public administrations have implications in the assessment of the level of performance regarding the achievement of the own revenues of these public entities. The objective of the paper is to examine the causal link between the level of performance in achieving own revenues and that of the financial autonomy of local public administrations. The paper includes a summary of the evolution of legal regulations in Romania specific to local public administration and own revenue management, as well as an analysis of information highlighted in budget execution accounts published by entities for 2018-2020, and the latest annual reports published by the Court of Accounts of Romania regarding the deviations found and the audit opinion formulated following the financial audit missions in order to identify the aspects that may influence the level of performance in achieving its own revenues at the level of local public administrations. The sample consists of territorial administrative units classified as cities in the Western Region of Romania, which are not municipalities and are found in Arad County. The results of the study revealed that some cities had a fairly high level of performance in generating their own revenues, and some reported increasing capital expenditures from year to year, but in most cases the degree of achievement of their own revenues still remains quite low. The conclusion is that the degree of achievement of own revenues is in most cases at a level that needs to be improved, and payments for capital expenditures are still quite low, so none of the cities in the selected sample have the opportunity to be financed exclusively from own revenues.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ringa Raudla ◽  
James W. Douglas

PurposeHow does the era of austerity affect flexibility and control in budget implementation? The execution phase of the budget has remained underexplored in the budgeting literature. Theoretically, a crisis and austerity period may trigger changes in budget execution in one of two key directions: either toward greater control or greater flexibility. This paper seeks to uncover which outcome is more likely.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted elite interviews of key officials involved in the budget execution phases in two European countries: Portugal and Austria.FindingsThe cases demonstrate that the experience of a fiscal crisis and period of austerity tend to lead to greater control and constrained flexibility in budget execution.Originality/valueThe execution phase of the budget process has remained underexplored in the public budgeting literature, and there has been only limited discussion on how the experience of austerity affects it. This empirical study of Portugal and Austria helps to shed light on that question.


Author(s):  
L. R. Jones ◽  
Jerry McCaffery ◽  
Fred Thompson

Author(s):  
Hoda El Enbaby ◽  
Hoda Selim

This chapter argues that political economy factors, rather than oil wealth, shape the budgetary process and outcomes in Bahrain. Fiscal volatility and excessive current spending (in the form of wages, social welfare, and subsidies) leading to unsustainable non-oil deficits are not fully derived from oil price volatility. Weak institutions, including those underlying the budgetary process, have contributed to some fiscal laxity. These have allowed rulers to use current spending as a channel for the redistribution of oil rents and to secure political stability and allegiance to the regime in a turbulent sociopolitical environment. The budgetary process has been undermined by the structure of the bicameral parliament, while the absence of restrictions on parliament to amend the budget weakens the position of the executive. In the general context of limited transparency and accountability, the government may also be exercising its discretionary powers over the budget execution but this cannot be known.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josette Caruana ◽  
Kimberly Zammit

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the relationship between control by the Maltese Central Government on Local Government and the format and basis of budgetary and financial reporting used. The study analyses the role of reporting in agency and fiscal federalism theories.Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews were carried out with the controller (Central Government officials and the National Audit Office), while a survey was carried out with the controlled (Maltese Local Councils).FindingsThe type of reporting used by Maltese Local Councils may be undermining the control that Central Government seeks to exercise on overspending and debt levels. The Local Councils’ financial statements report accrual deficits and increasing liabilities. This overspending appears to slip through Parliamentary scrutiny because the latter approves cash allocations to Local Councils; the financial reports submitted to Parliament do not highlight overspending in cash terms; and the cash budget execution report that should be prepared by Local Councils is not given due importance.Originality/valueCentral Government should be consistent in its policy towards Local Government, which may require more elaborate reporting. This study highlights the importance of aligning the reporting required (top-down) and the reporting presented (bottom-up) – otherwise, control is at stake.


Auditor ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 36-42
Author(s):  
Н. Парасоцкая ◽  
N. Parasotskaya ◽  
А. Зубрицкая ◽  
A. Zubrickaya

Th is article is devoted to the practical aspect of cash planning, associated with the risk of ineffi cient distribution of expenditure and revenue of the cash plan. Th e cause of the cash shortfalls during the execution of the corresponding budget is also mentioned in this article.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document