Treatment of Dental Anomalies in Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate at Sickkids Hospital, Toronto

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra F. Cassolato ◽  
Bruce Ross ◽  
John Daskalogiannakis ◽  
James Noble ◽  
Bryan Tompson
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Surgical Closure ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

Objective: To quantify dental anomalies in permanent dentition associated with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and to survey treatment modalities used to address these problems. Method: Retrospective study of 116 children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate treated at SickKids since birth. Presence and morphology of lateral incisors and second premolars were determined. Orthodontic, surgical, and/or prosthetic procedures were analyzed. Results: The cleft-side lateral incisor was absent in 93.1% of finished cases. The lateral incisor mesial to the cleft was present in 4.3%, absent due to agenesis in 75.9%, and extracted in 19.8% of cases. The lateral distal to the cleft was present in 2.6%, absent due to agenesis in 33.6%, and extracted in 63.8% of cases. Of 105 lateral incisors, only one had normal morphology. Noncleft-side lateral incisors were absent in 16% of finished cases. Absence was due to agenesis in 12.1% of cases and extraction in 4.3%. When the lateral incisor was missing, closure of the dental space occurred by orthodontic tooth movement after alveolar bone grafting (45%); surgical closure with simultaneous alveolar bone grafting (35%); prosthetic closure (17%); and 3% were failures. Agenesis of premolars occurred in 12.1% of cleft-side and 10.3% of noncleft-side maxillary second premolars. Conclusions: The cleft-side lateral incisor is rarely present at the conclusion of orthodontic and surgical treatment of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Often absent due to agenesis, when present it is typically abnormal in size and bone support and is commonly extracted in favor of canine substitution.

Surgical Repositioning of the Premaxilla in Combination with Two-Stage Alveolar Bone Grafting in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuyoshi Iino ◽  
Tomokazu Sasaki ◽  
Shoko Kochi ◽  
Masayuki Fukuda ◽  
Tetsu Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip

Objective This paper introduces a surgical technique for premaxillary repositioning in combination with two-stage alveolar bone grafting for the correction of the premaxillary deformity of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). The paper also reports on two patients with BCLP who underwent this surgical management. Surgical Procedure The operation is usually performed when the patient is 8 to 14 years of age. In the first stage of surgery, the side more accessible to the septopremaxillary junction is selected, and an osteotomy of the premaxilla and unilateral alveolar bone grafting are performed. Approximately 4 to 12 months after the first stage of surgery, contralateral alveolar bone grafting is carried out. Conclusion We have found that this surgical procedure is highly effective, because it ensures the blood supply to the premaxilla and minimizes the potential for surgical failure. Moreover, it affords wide exposure of the premaxillary bone surface, facilitating sufficient boney bridging and allowing for orthodontic tooth movement.

Sella Turcica Bridging and Tooth Agenesis in Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562098464
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Antonarakis ◽  
Luis Huanca Ghislanzoni ◽  
David M. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Sella Turcica ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Maximum Height ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms

Aim: To investigate differences in sella turcica size and bridging in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with or without concomitant dental anomalies. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out looking at 56 children with nonsyndromic UCLP. Lateral cephalograms, taken before alveolar bone grafting, were used to assess sella turcica height, width, area, and bridging. Panoramic radiographs were used to evaluate the presence of dental anomalies in the cleft area including agenesis, supernumerary, and peg-shaped lateral incisors. Differences between sella turcica measurements in the presence or absence of dental anomalies were assessed using t tests. Differences between the prevalence of dental anomalies and sella turcica bridging were assessed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate potential associations between sella measurements and dental anomalies. Results: Twenty-six of the 56 children presented with agenesis of the cleft-side lateral incisor, while 7 had a supernumerary, and 19 had a peg-shaped lateral incisor. With regard to sella turcica bridging, 27 children had no calcification, 25 partial and 4 complete calcification. Children with agenesis of the cleft-side lateral incisor showed a shorter sella maximum height ( P = .010) and a smaller area ( P = .019). When looking at sella turcica bridging, 100% of children with complete calcification showed agenesis of the cleft-side lateral incisor, compared with 52% and 33% of children with partial calcification and no calcification, respectively ( P = .034). Conclusions: Children with UCLP and sella turcica bridging are more likely to present with agenesis of the cleft-side maxillary lateral incisor.

scholarly journals Evaluation of maxillary central incisors on the noncleft and cleft sides in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate—Part 1: Relationship between root length and orthodontic tooth movement

2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 855-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Maeda-Iino ◽  
Kanako Marutani ◽  
Minami Furukawa ◽  
Shoko Nakagawa ◽  
Sangho Kwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Length ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Apex ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

ABSTRACT Objectives: To measure the root lengths of maxillary central incisors (U1) and evaluate the relationship among U1 root length, tooth movement, and type of treatment appliance in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate over a long-term follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Occlusal radiographs of 30 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, acquired less than 6 months before secondary alveolar bone grafting (SBG, T1) and after edgewise treatment (T2), were measured for U1 root length (R1 and R2, root lengths at T1 and T2, respectively). Frontal and lateral cephalometric radiographs acquired at eruption of U1 (T0), T1, and T2 were evaluated to determine the inclination and position of U1. Results: The average values of R1 and R2 on the cleft side were significantly lower than those on the noncleft side. Frontal cephalometric analysis revealed that the horizontal distance of the root apex from the median vertical line at T0 on the cleft side was significantly smaller than that on the noncleft side and was correlated with short U1 root length on the cleft side. On the other hand, R1 in patients treated with maxillary protraction appliances between T0 and T1 was significantly shorter than that in patients without maxillary protraction appliances. However, none of the changes in cephalometric measurements were correlated with root length. Conclusions: In patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, the short root length of cleft-adjacent central incisors might be associated with the horizontal position of the root apex. In addition, orthodontic treatment with a maxillary protraction appliance before secondary alveolar bone grafting might be associated with short U1 root length.

Factors Influencing Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Prospective Analysis Using CT Image Analyzer

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomomichi Ozawa ◽  
Susumu Omura ◽  
Eiji Fukuyama ◽  
Yoshiro Matsui ◽  
Katuyuki Torikai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Image Analyzer ◽  
Ct Image ◽  
Bone Bridge ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

Objective: To examine the effect of migration of the germ of the lateral incisor into the bone for eruption factors on bone bridge resorption. Methods: Twenty-five subjects who underwent secondary alveolar bone graft were enrolled. The volume of the alveolar bone grafts immediately after the operation (V1), bone bridge formation 6 months postoperatively (V2), and tooth (teeth) migration into the bone bridge (Vt) were measured using a computed tomography (CT) image analyzer. Based upon these measurements, the following points were examined: (1) the correlation between the tooth-occupied ratio (Rt = Vt/V2 × 100) and the ratio of bone bridge resorption (Rv = (V1 − V2)/ V1 × 100); and (2) comparison of the tooth-occupied ratio (Rt) and the ratio of bone bridge resorption (Rv) between the groups with and without the germ of the lateral incisor. Results: A significant negative correlation was found between Rv and Rt (p < .001). Comparison of Rv and Rt between the groups with and without a germ of the lateral incisor revealed that both indices were significantly higher in the former group than the latter one (p < .05). Conclusion: In cleft lip and palate patients with a germ of the lateral incisor, it is beneficial to carry out secondary bone grafting to the alveolar cleft at the age of 5 to 7 years, preceding eruption of the canine, in order to form a good bone bridge that will facilitate eruption of the lateral incisor and subsequent normal dentition and occlusion.

Study on Tooth Movement After the Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. e284-e288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenjie Yang ◽  
Yufen Qian ◽  
Zhenqi Chen ◽  
Yusheng Yang ◽  
Quan Yu
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

scholarly journals Alveolar bone grafting

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S110-S115
Author(s):  
Jan Lilja
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Canine Tooth ◽  
Alar Base ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Palate Bone

ABSTRACTIn patients with cleft lip and palate, bone grafting in the mixed dentition in the residual alveolar cleft has become a well-established procedure. The main advantages can be summarised as follows: stabilisation of the maxillary arch; facilitation of eruption of the canine and sometimes facilitation of the lateral incisor eruption; providing bony support to the teeth adjacent to the cleft; raising the alar base of the nose; facilitation of closure of an oro-nasal fistula; making it possible to insert a titanium fixture in the grafted site and to obtain favourable periodontal conditions of the teeth within and adjacent to the cleft. The timing of the ABG surgery take into consideration not only eruption of the canine but also that of the lateral incisor, if present. The best time for bone grafting surgery is when a thin shell of bone still covers the soon erupting lateral incisor or canine tooth close to the cleft.

A CBCT Based Assessment of Canine Eruption and Development Following Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients Born With Unilateral Cleft lip and/or Palate

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110644
Author(s):  
Hasan Kadi ◽  
Reinhilde Jacobs ◽  
Sohaib Shujaat ◽  
Mathias Lemberger ◽  
Daniel Benchimol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Vertical Movement ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Significant Difference

To three-dimensionally assess and visualize the eruption path and development of the maxillary canine following alveolar bone grafting in patients born with cleft lip and palate. A further objective of this analysis was to assess how the presence of the lateral incisor impacts the eruption path of the canine. Observational follow-up study. Stockholm Craniofacial Team, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Thirty children born with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip with or without palate were consecutively included. CBCT scans of the maxilla were taken six months before and six months after the alveolar bone-grafting surgery for each patient. Canine eruption (angulation and vertical movement) and canine development (length and volume). There was a significant difference pre- and post-operatively of the canine angulation between the cleft and non-cleft sides. The mean angulation on the cleft side was 14.7° (SD  =  11.1°) while on the non-cleft side, it was 4.9° (SD  =  9.2°). No significant differences were noted between cleft-side and non-cleft side canines in terms of amount of vertical eruption and volumetric development. Absence of the lateral incisor did not significantly contribute to either canine angulation or its vertical eruption on the cleft-side. Higher angulation of the canine on the cleft side indicates a higher risk of future canine impaction. Presence or absence of the lateral incisor did not significantly affect canine angulation or its vertical eruption. Increased age and children born with total cleft lip and palate imply a higher risk of angulated canines on the cleft side.

scholarly journals Maxillary Canine Impaction and Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review of the Current Literature

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Alqerban
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Current Literature ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

The present review aims to investigate the effect of alveolar bone grafting in canine impacted unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. The goal of this review is to identify and highlight the factors that may cause maxillary canine impaction, the role of primary and secondary bone graft and dental anomalies that may affect canine impaction in patients with cleft lip and palate.

scholarly journals Evaluation of maxillary central incisors on the noncleft and cleft sides in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate—Part 2: Relationship between root resorption, horizontal tooth movement, and quantity of grafted autogenous bone

2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 863-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Maeda-Iino ◽  
Minami Furukawa ◽  
Sangho Kwon ◽  
Kanako Marutani ◽  
Shoko Nakagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Apex ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the relationship between external apical root resorption (EARR) of the maxillary central incisors (U1), horizontal orthodontic tooth movement, and quantity of grafted bone in subjects with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) over an average duration of 8 years. Materials and Methods: Thirty subjects with UCLP were evaluated for EARR of U1 after edgewise treatment (T2). The teeth were classified as having no EARR, moderate EARR (combined into “no/moderate” EARR), or severe EARR. Frontal cephalometric radiographs acquired at eruption of U1 (T0), less than 6 months before secondary alveolar bone grafting (T1), and T2 were evaluated to determine the horizontal inclination (U1-axis angle) and distance of the root apex from the median line (U1-root–VL distance). On the cleft side, the quantities of grafted bone at less than 12 months postsecondary bone grafting and at T2 were evaluated using the alveolar bone graft (ABG) scale. Results: Cleft-adjacent teeth exhibited more severe EARR than did teeth on the noncleft side. The cleft side exhibited greater changes in U1-axis angle and U1-root–VL distance between T0 and T2 than did the noncleft side. On the cleft side, the ABG score at T2 in the severe EARR group was significantly lower than that in the no/moderate EARR group. These measurements were correlated with EARR grade. Conclusions: Cleft-adjacent U1 exhibited more severe EARR than did the U1 on the noncleft side, which might be associated with orthodontic treatment-induced changes in horizontal inclination and root apex movement. On the cleft side, severity of EARR may be correlated with the success of ABG.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document