Linking the green and brown worlds through nonconsumptive predator effects

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael I Sitvarin
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 537 ◽  
pp. 49-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Davidson ◽  
JN Griffin ◽  
C Angelini ◽  
F Coleman ◽  
RL Atkins ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 184 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Weissburg ◽  
Delbert L. Smee ◽  
Matthew C. Ferner

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 319-340
Author(s):  
Amanda D. Benoit ◽  
Susan Kalisz

Plants are the foundation of the food web and therefore interact directly and indirectly with myriad organisms at higher trophic levels. They directly provide nourishment to mutualistic and antagonistic primary consumers (e.g., pollinators and herbivores), which in turn are consumed by predators. These interactions produce cascading indirect effects on plants (either trait-mediated or density-mediated). We review how predators affect plant-pollinator interactions and thus how predators indirectly affect plant reproduction, fitness, mating systems, and trait evolution. Predators can influence pollinator abundance and foraging behavior. In many cases, predators cause pollinators to visit plants less frequently and for shorter durations. This decline in visitation can lead to pollen limitation and decreased seed set. However, alternative outcomes can result due to differences in predator, pollinator, and plant functional traits as well as due to altered interaction networks with plant enemies. Furthermore, predators may indirectly affect the evolution of plant traits and mating systems.


2010 ◽  
Vol 402 ◽  
pp. 147-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Compte ◽  
S Gascón ◽  
XD Quintana ◽  
D Boix

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.M. Steinbeiser ◽  
C.A. Wawrzynowski ◽  
X. Ramos ◽  
Z.H. Olson

Many vertebrate scavengers function as predators in ecosystems, suggesting that the presence of scavengers and occurrence of predator effects may be intertwined near carcasses. We tested for risk effects near a series of experimentally placed carcasses by measuring small-mammal foraging in a before–after control–impact design. Validation efforts revealed low levels of food loss from stations due to human error and invertebrate foraging, and habituation to stations occurred after 2 weeks. Increased perceived predation risk by small mammals relative to controls occurred in three of seven trials. The effect was observed across tested carcass types (beaver, Castor canadensis Kuhl, 1820; white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus (Zimmermann, 1780)) and seasons (summer and fall). However, small mammals also increased foraging relative to controls in two of seven trials, and foraging reached a ceiling in two other trials that prevented inference on a response. Taken together, our results suggest that scavenger recruitment to carcasses can in some instances create islands of risk for prey on the landscape, but the effect is not likely to be universal. Where small-mammal foraging does decrease, further work will be necessary to determine if risk effects cascade to adjacent trophic levels through enhanced seed and seedling survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document