Comparative assessment of six automatic optimization techniques for calibration of a conceptual rainfall—runoff model

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
MONOMOY GOSWAMI ◽  
KIERAN MICHAEL O'CONNOR
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Optimization Techniques ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Automatic Optimization ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

scholarly journals An Automatic Optimization Technique for the Calibration of a Physically Based Hydrological Rainfall-Runoff Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Zohou Pierre Jérôme ◽  
Alamou Adéchina Eric ◽  
Obada Ezéchiel ◽  
Biao Iboukoun Eliézer ◽  
Eugène C. Ezin
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Technique ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Automatic Optimization ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

scholarly journals Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 449-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Viglione ◽  
J. Parajka ◽  
M. Rogger ◽  
J. L. Salinas ◽  
G. Laaha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Ungauged Basins ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Low Flows ◽  
High Flows ◽  
Seasonal Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Predictions In Ungauged Basins ◽  
Runoff Model

Abstract. In a three-part paper we assess the performance of runoff predictions in ungauged basins in a comparative way. While Parajka et al. (2013) and Salinas et al. (2013) assess the regionalisation of hydrographs and hydrological extremes through a literature review, in this paper we assess prediction of a range of runoff signatures for a consistent dataset. Daily runoff time series are predicted for 213 catchments in Austria by a regionalised rainfall–runoff model and by Top-Kriging, a geostatistical interpolation method that accounts for the river network hierarchy. From the runoff timeseries, six runoff signatures are extracted: annual runoff, seasonal runoff, flow duration curves, low flows, high flows and runoff hydrograph. The predictive performance is assessed by the bias, error spread and proportion of unexplained spatial variance of statistical measures of these signatures in cross-validation mode. Results of the comparative assessment show that the geostatistical approach (Top-Kriging) generally outperforms the regionalised rainfall–runoff model. The predictive performance increases with catchment area for both methods and all signatures, while the dependence on climate characteristics is weaker. Annual and seasonal runoff can be predicted more accurately than all other signatures. The spatial variability of high flows is the most difficult to capture followed by the low flows. The relative predictive performance of the signatures depends on the selected performance measures. It is therefore essential to report performance in a consistent way by more than one performance measure.

scholarly journals Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 2263-2279 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Viglione ◽  
J. Parajka ◽  
M. Rogger ◽  
J. L. Salinas ◽  
G. Laaha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Ungauged Basins ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
High Flows ◽  
Seasonal Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Predictions In Ungauged Basins ◽  
Runoff Model

Abstract. This is the third of a three-part paper series through which we assess the performance of runoff predictions in ungauged basins in a comparative way. Whereas the two previous papers by Parajka et al. (2013) and Salinas et al. (2013) assess the regionalisation performance of hydrographs and hydrological extremes on the basis of a comprehensive literature review of thousands of case studies around the world, in this paper we jointly assess prediction performance of a range of runoff signatures for a consistent and rich dataset. Daily runoff time series are predicted for 213 catchments in Austria by a regionalised rainfall–runoff model and by Top-kriging, a geostatistical estimation method that accounts for the river network hierarchy. From the runoff time-series, six runoff signatures are extracted: annual runoff, seasonal runoff, flow duration curves, low flows, high flows and runoff hydrographs. The predictive performance is assessed in terms of the bias, error spread and proportion of unexplained spatial variance of statistical measures of these signatures in cross-validation (blind testing) mode. Results of the comparative assessment show that, in Austria, the predictive performance increases with catchment area for both methods and for most signatures, it tends to increase with elevation for the regionalised rainfall–runoff model, while the dependence on climate characteristics is weaker. Annual and seasonal runoff can be predicted more accurately than all other signatures. The spatial variability of high flows in ungauged basins is the most difficult to estimate followed by the low flows. It also turns out that in this data-rich study in Austria, the geostatistical approach (Top-kriging) generally outperforms the regionalised rainfall–runoff model.

scholarly journals Effects of streamflow isotope sampling strategies on the calibration of a tracer‐aided rainfall‐runoff model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Lee Stevenson ◽  
Christian Birkel ◽  
Aaron J. Neill ◽  
Doerthe Tetzlaff ◽  
Chris Soulsby
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Strategies ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of a Two-Parameters Monthly Rainfall-Runoff Model in the Southern Basin of Thailand

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1226
Author(s):  
Pakorn Ditthakit ◽  
Sirimon Pinthong ◽  
Nureehan Salaeh ◽  
Fadilah Binnui ◽  
Laksanara Khwanchum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Runoff Variation ◽  
Groundwater Exchange ◽  
Monthly Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Two Parameters ◽  
Runoff Model

Accurate monthly runoff estimation is crucial in water resources management, planning, and development, preventing and reducing water-related problems, such as flooding and droughts. This article evaluates the monthly hydrological rainfall-runoff model’s performance, the GR2M model, in Thailand’s southern basins. The GR2M model requires only two parameters: production store (X1) and groundwater exchange rate (X2). Moreover, no prior research has been reported on its application in this region. The 37 runoff stations, which are located in three sub-watersheds of Thailand’s southern region, namely; Thale Sap Songkhla, Peninsular-East Coast, and Peninsular-West Coast, were selected as study cases. The available monthly hydrological data of runoff, rainfall, air temperature from the Royal Irrigation Department (RID) and the Thai Meteorological Department (TMD) were collected and analyzed. The Thornthwaite method was utilized for the determination of evapotranspiration. The model’s performance was conducted using three statistical indices: Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Correlation Coefficient (r), and Overall Index (OI). The model’s calibration results for 37 runoff stations gave the average NSE, r, and OI of 0.657, 0.825, and 0.757, respectively. Moreover, the NSE, r, and OI values for the model’s verification were 0.472, 0.750, and 0.639, respectively. Hence, the GR2M model was qualified and reliable to apply for determining monthly runoff variation in this region. The spatial distribution of production store (X1) and groundwater exchange rate (X2) values was conducted using the IDW method. It was susceptible to the X1, and X2 values of approximately more than 0.90, gave the higher model’s performance.

Effects of conditional parameterization on performance of rainfall-runoff model regarding hydrologic non-stationarity

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (26) ◽  
pp. 3953-3961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangmei Luo ◽  
Enli Wang ◽  
Shuanghe Shen ◽  
Hongxing Zheng ◽  
Yongqiang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document