scholarly journals Pluripotent Stem Cells and DNA Damage Response to Ionizing Radiations

2016 ◽  
Vol 186 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpana Mujoo ◽  
E. Brian Butler ◽  
Raj K. Pandita ◽  
Clayton R. Hunt ◽  
Tej K. Pandita
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryce A. Seifert ◽  
Marion Dejosez ◽  
Thomas P. Zwaka

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Liedtke ◽  
Sophie Biebernick ◽  
Teja Falk Radke ◽  
Daniela Stapelkamp ◽  
Carolin Coenen ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1548
Author(s):  
Andy Chun Hang Chen ◽  
Qian Peng ◽  
Sze Wan Fong ◽  
Kai Chuen Lee ◽  
William Shu Biu Yeung ◽  
...  

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) hold great promise in cell-based therapy because of their pluripotent property and the ability to proliferate indefinitely. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) derived from inner cell mass (ICM) possess unique cell cycle control with shortened G1 phase. In addition, ESCs have high expression of homologous recombination (HR)-related proteins, which repair double-strand breaks (DSBs) through HR or the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. On the other hand, the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by forced expression of transcription factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc) is accompanied by oxidative stress and DNA damage. The DNA repair mechanism of DSBs is therefore critical in determining the genomic stability and efficiency of iPSCs generation. Maintaining genomic stability in PSCs plays a pivotal role in the proliferation and pluripotency of PSCs. In terms of therapeutic application, genomic stability is the key to reducing the risks of cancer development due to abnormal cell replication. Over the years, we and other groups have identified important regulators of DNA damage response in PSCs, including FOXM1, SIRT1 and PUMA. They function through transcription regulation of downstream targets (P53, CDK1) that are involved in cell cycle regulations. Here, we review the fundamental links between the PSC-specific HR process and DNA damage response, with a focus on the roles of FOXM1 and SIRT1 on maintaining genomic integrity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 740-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjie Lu ◽  
Hu Li ◽  
Anna Baccei ◽  
Takayo Sasaki ◽  
David M. Gilbert ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 719-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikio Shimada ◽  
Kaima Tsukada ◽  
Nozomi Kagawa ◽  
Yoshihisa Matsumoto

Abstract Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), such as embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), have a dual capability to self-renew and differentiate into all cell types necessary to develop an entire organism. Differentiation is associated with dynamic epigenetic alteration and transcriptional change, while self-renewal depends on maintaining the genome DNA accurately. Genome stability of PSCs is strictly regulated to maintain pluripotency. However, the DNA damage response (DDR) mechanism in PSCs is still unclear. There is accumulating evidence that genome stability and pluripotency are regulated by a transcriptional change in undifferentiated and differentiated states. iPSCs are ideal for analyzing transcriptional regulation during reprogramming and differentiation. This study aimed to elucidate the transcriptional alteration surrounding genome stability maintenance, including DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis in fibroblasts, iPSCs and neural progenitor cells (NPCs) derived from iPSCs as differentiated cells. After ionizing radiation exposure, foci for the DNA double-stranded break marker γ-H2AX increased, peaking at 0.5 h in all cells (>90%), decreasing after 4 h in fibroblasts (32.3%) and NPCs (22.3%), but still remaining at 52.5% (NB1RGB C2 clone) and 54.7% (201B7 cells) in iPSCs. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells were detected, indicating that iPSCs’ apoptosis increases. In addition, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis showed high expression of apoptosis genes (TP53, CASP3 and BID) in iPSCs. Results suggested that increased apoptosis activity maintains accurate, undifferentiated genome DNA in the cell population.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. ii4
Author(s):  
T.M. Marti ◽  
C.C. Tièche ◽  
R. Peng ◽  
S.R.R. Hall ◽  
L. Froment ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 6583-6593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Nagle ◽  
Nynke A. Hosper ◽  
Lara Barazzuol ◽  
Anne L. Jellema ◽  
Mirjam Baanstra ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document