scholarly journals Estimation of annual average daily traffic with optimal adjustment factors

2015 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borja Alonso ◽  
José Luis Moura ◽  
Angel Ibeas ◽  
Juan Pablo Romero
2015 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-414
Author(s):  
Borja Alonso ◽  
Angel Ibeas ◽  
José Luis Moura ◽  
Juan Pablo Romero

Author(s):  
Dadang Mohamad ◽  
Kumares C. Sinha ◽  
Thomas Kuczek ◽  
Charles F. Scholer

A traffic prediction model that incorporates relevant demographic variables for county roads was developed. Field traffic data were collected from 40 out of 92 counties in Indiana. The selection of a county was based on population, state highway mileage, per capita income, and the presence of interstate highways. Three to four automatic traffic counters were installed in each selected county. Most counters installed on the selected road sections were based on the standard 48-hour traffic counts. Then, the obtained average daily traffic was converted to annual average daily traffic by means of adjustment factors. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to develop the model. There were quantitative and qualitative predictor variables used in the model development. To validate the developed model, additional field traffic data were collected from eight randomly selected counties. The accuracy measures of the validation showed the high accuracy of the model. The statistical analyses also found that the independent variables employed in the model were statistically significant. The number of independent variables included in the model was kept to a minimum.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shy Bassan

Traffic data in general and traffic volume in particular are collected to determine the use and performance of the roadway system. Due to budget limitations, traffic volume cannot be counted day by day for every roadway within the state. Therefore, the volume on roadways without automatic traffic recorders (ATRs) can be determined by taking portable short-duration counts and using adjustment factors to produce annual average daily traffic (AADT) at a specific location. This study presents a statistical practical methodology that develops traffic pattern groups (TPGs) by combining roadways with similar traffic characteristics such as volume, seasonal variation, and land use in Delaware, USA. Monthly seasonal adjustment factors and their coefficient of variance (FCV) are analyzed for each group. To meet the desired confidence level and precision intervals, the TPGs’ ATR inventory is examined such that the required sample size is determined by the critical month.


2000 ◽  
Vol 1719 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satish C. Sharma ◽  
Pawan Lingras ◽  
Guo X. Liu ◽  
Fei Xu

Estimation of the annual average daily traffic (AADT) for low-volume roads is investigated. Artificial neural networks are compared with the traditional factor approach for estimating AADT from short-period traffic counts. Fifty-five automatic traffic recorder (ATR) sites located on low-volume rural roads in Alberta, Canada, are used as study samples. The results of this study indicate that, when a single 48-h count is used for AADT estimation, the factor approach can yield better results than the neural networks if the ATR sites are grouped appropriately and the sample sites are correctly assigned to various ATR groups. Unfortunately, the current recommended practice offers little guidance on how to achieve the assignment accuracy that may be necessary to obtain reliable AADT estimates from a single 48-h count. The neural network approach can be particularly suitable for estimating AADT from two 48-h counts taken at different times during the counting season. In fact, the 95th percentile error values of about 25 percent as obtained in this study for the neural network models compare favorably with the values reported in the literature for low-volume roads using the traditional factor approach. The advantage of the neural network approach is that classification of ATR sites and sample site assignments to ATR groups are not required. The analysis of various groups of low-volume roads presented also leads to a conclusion that, when defining low-volume roads from a traffic monitoring point of view, it is not likely to matter much whether the AADT on the facility is less than 500 vehicles, less than 750 vehicles, or less than 1,000 vehicles.


Author(s):  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Mei Chen

Annual average daily traffic (AADT) is a critical input into many transportation applications, particularly safety reporting. For example, the Highway Safety Improvement Program in the U.S. requires states to make AADT data for all public paved roadways accessible by 2026. Because collecting traffic counts on every network segment is prohibitively expensive, a method capable of accurately estimating AADT on unmonitored segments is of great value to state DOTs. The ubiquitous probe vehicle data present a great opportunity to this end. This paper presents an enhanced method for statewide AADT estimation by leveraging such data in Kentucky. The use of the probe data is explored in two ways. First, an annual average daily probes (AADP) variable is derived from hourly probe counts; second, a betweenness centrality (BC) variable is calculated using probe speeds. Including both variables and using the random forest model results in model performance that exceeds those previously reported for statewide applications. Incorporating AADP and BC improves the accuracy of AADT estimates by 30%–37% for all roads and 23%–43% for highways in functional classes 5–7, compared with only using sociodemographic and roadway characteristics. These results demonstrate the value of the probe data for enhancing AADT estimation. The analysis further shows that on roadways having more than 53 AADP or an average of 2.2 probe counts per hour, the median and the mean absolute percent errors are below 20% and 25%, respectively. These findings have practical implications for state DOTs wanting to maximize the utility of probe vehicle data.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2308 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregorio Gecchele ◽  
Riccardo Rossi ◽  
Massimiliano Gastaldi ◽  
Shinya Kikuchi

Author(s):  
Abraham Mensah ◽  
Ezra Hauer

A function linking the expected accident frequency to traffic flow is called a safety performance function (SPF). SPFs are estimated from data for various facilities and accident types. Typically, accident counts over a period of a year or more, and estimates of average flow for such periods, serve as data. The ideal is for SPFs to represent cause-effect regularities. However, because accident counts are for a long time period and because average flows are used, two issues of averaging arise. First, the cause-effect relationship is between accidents and the flows prevailing near the time of accident occurrence. Therefore, ideally, these should be the argument of the SPF. In practice, however, either because of lack of detail or difficulties of estimation, average flows are used for estimation. The question is what problems arise when average flows, such as annual average daily traffic, instead of the flows at the time of the accident are used as the argument of the SPF. This is the argument averaging problem. Second, there are at least two (daytime and nighttime) and perhaps many more cause-effect SPFs that prevail in the course of a year. Ideally, each relationship should be estimated separately. The question is what problems arise if one joint SPF is estimated when two or more separate functions should have been used. This is the function averaging problem. After analysis, how to account and how to correct for the argument averaging problem are shown. At this time, avoiding the function averaging problem by estimating daytime and nighttime SPFs separately can be the only recommendation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document