scholarly journals Is the Ethnic Disparity in CKD a Symptom of Dysfunctional Primary Care in the US?

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1249-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Wesson
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Abe ◽  
S. Tsunawaki ◽  
M. Dejonckheere ◽  
C. T. Cigolle ◽  
K. Phillips ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While dementia is a common problem in Japan and the US, primary care physicians' practices and perspectives about diagnosing dementia in these different healthcare systems are unknown. Methods Qualitative research was conducted in an ethnographic tradition using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis in primary care settings across Japan and in the Midwest State of Michigan, US. Participants were a total of 48 primary care physicians, 24 each from Japan and the US participated. Both groups contained a mixture of geographic areas (rural/urban), gender, age, and years of experience as primary care physicians. Results Participants in Japan and the US voiced similar practices for making the diagnosis of dementia and held similar views about the desired benefits of diagnosing dementia. Differences were found in attitudes about the appropriate timing of formally diagnosing dementia. Japanese physicians tended to make a formal diagnosis when problems that would benefit from long-term care services emerged for family members. US physicians were more proactive in diagnosing dementia in the early stages by screening for dementia in health check-ups and promoting advance directives when the patients were still capable of decision-making. Views about appropriate timing of diagnostic testing for dementia in the two systems reflect what medical or nursing care services physicians can use to support dementia patients and caregivers. Conclusions Benefits of making the diagnosis included the need to activate the long-term care services in Japan and for early intervention and authoring advance directives in the US. Testing to establish an early diagnosis of dementia by primary care physicians only partly relates to testing and treatment options available. Benefits of making the diagnosis included the need to activate the long-term care services in Japan and for early intervention and authoring advance directives in the US.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1368-1376
Author(s):  
David I. Auerbach ◽  
Douglas E. Levy ◽  
Peter Maramaldi ◽  
Robert S. Dittus ◽  
Joanne Spetz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eric L. Ross ◽  
Kelly L. Zuromski ◽  
Ben Y. Reis ◽  
Matthew K. Nock ◽  
Ronald C. Kessler ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6536-6536
Author(s):  
Dave Smart ◽  
Peter Riccelli ◽  
Keith Kerr ◽  
Jordan Clark ◽  
Susanne Munksted Fosvig ◽  
...  

6536 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused >400,000 infection related deaths in the US to January 2021. Actions taken to limit COVID-19 infection and mortality could potentially lead to unintended consequences, precipitating excess mortality due to other causes. One such cause is delayed cancer diagnosis. Significant decreases in presentation for cancer diagnosis at the primary care level have been noted in the UK. This study aimed to look for evidence of a similar effect in the US. Methods: CMS claims data from JAN18-JUN20 associated with primary diagnosis across 11 cancers (bladder, breast, cervical, colorectal, endometrial, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, sarcoma and thyroid) were analyzed for use of surgical pathology (SP), a procedure associated with initial diagnosis, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Test volumes varied widely by test and cancer so were normalized to enable comparison across indications. This was done by dividing the month-on-month difference for the period JAN19-JUN19 vs JAN20-JUN20 by the median monthly test volume for the period JAN18-DEC19 (“pre-COVID period”). Extent and duration of declines in test rates and number of missing patients as the sum of these declines were then determined. The ratio of IHC to SP testing was taken to determine any decline in likely post-initial diagnosis testing. Results: There were significant (>10%) declines in test volumes for SP for all 11 cancers at some time in Q1-Q2 2020. Table. Extent, duration and return to pre-COVID levels for SP testing across 11 cancers Median extent and duration of the decline was 56% (range 41.1%-80.4%) and 2 months (range 1- >4). This equates to 32,192 missing diagnoses across all cancers. SP test volumes for all cancers except lung and breast had returned to around pre-COVID levels by JUN20. There was no significant (>10%) increase in normalized SP test volume after the COVID dip for any cancer. While SP showed decreased test volumes across all cancers at some point during the first half of 2020, test volume ratios of IHC to SP showed increases for most cancers in the same time period. Conclusions: These data highlight that the decline in patients presenting to their primary care physicians with suspicion of cancer for diagnostic investigation was linked to COVID-19 prevention strategies. No evidence for increased, “catch up” testing to address presentational/diagnostic backlog was observed. Thus, it is predicted that these patients may subsequently present with a more advanced cancer. Potential excess morbidity, mortality and cost associated with absent or delayed diagnosis should be factored into cancer control programs going forward.[Table: see text]


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 733-735
Author(s):  
Modena Wilson ◽  
Donald M. Berwick ◽  
Carolyn DiGuiseppi

Preventive services compose a large portion of primary care pediatrics, and pediatricians by their nature and training seem extraordinarily disposed toward clinical prevention. Therefore, when the first edition of the Guide to Clinical Preventive Services appeared in 1989 from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), the negative reaction of the organized pediatric community was disappointing. The second edition of that guide has just been released, and we three pediatricians, who have worked hard during the past 5 years as members and staff of the second task force, hope for a far more positive reaction from our colleagues this time around.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S66-S66
Author(s):  
David I Auerbach ◽  
Carie Michael ◽  
Douglas Levy ◽  
Peter Maramaldi ◽  
Robert Dittus ◽  
...  

Abstract As the US population ages, primary care is expected to be the health care “home” for older adults, and several initiatives are aimed at helping to transform primary care practice to care for this population. Wide variation in staffing has been observed. Meyers et al proposed ideal models of primary care staffing for a general population and for a frail elderly population (2018). We developed the 2018 Survey of Primary Care and Geriatric Clinicians to measure optimal team configuration in clinical practices caring for older adults. A majority employed NPs, MDs and PAs, with [r = -.53] between % of clinician labor of NPs and physicians). High-NP practices are more likely located in states with full scope of practice, perform well for frail elders and are less expensive. Meyers' models, with fewer physicians, more SW and CHWs, more RNs, perform better for frail elders, and are less expensive.


1986 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Nutting ◽  
E M Connor
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e2021476 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Caleb Alexander ◽  
Matthew Tajanlangit ◽  
James Heyward ◽  
Omar Mansour ◽  
Dima M. Qato ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document