scholarly journals MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE OCCIPITAL CONDYLES AND THEIR CORRELATION WITH HYPOGLOSSAL CANAL IN DRY SKULLS OF SOUTH INDIANS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1.2) ◽  
pp. 6154-6160
Author(s):  
Roopashree Ramakrishna ◽  
◽  
Azra Mubeen ◽  
Adil Ahmed Karnul ◽  
Balachandra N ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa BOZBUGA ◽  
Adnan ^|^Ouml;ZT^|^Uuml;RK ◽  
B^|^uuml;lent BAYRAKTAR ◽  
Zafer ARI ◽  
Kayihan SAHINOGLU ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1.1) ◽  
pp. 3318-3323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varsha. T. Sholapurkar ◽  
◽  
R.D. Virupaxi ◽  
S.P. Desai ◽  
◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (02) ◽  
pp. 078-084
Author(s):  
Vijisha Phalgunan ◽  
Suresh Narayanan

Abstract Aims and Objectives: Occipital condyle is an important landmark in transcondylar approach for surgery of lesions ventral to the brainstem, hence it is imperative to understand the anatomical aspects of occipital condyle. The aim of the present study is to analyse the morphometrical aspects of occipital condyle and to highlight its importance in surgical resection. Materials and method: Hundred occipital condyles of fifty dry skulls were used for this study. Twenty-six parameters were measured. The measurements were made separately for right and left sides. Results: The mean length of occipital condyle was found to be 22.92mm. The distance between the intracranial orifice of the hypoglossal canal and the posterior margin of occipital condyle was 12.55±0.05mm. The commonest location of intracranial orifice and extracranial orifice of hypoglossal canal was found to be at location 3 and location 2 respectively. Occipital condyle was oval in most skulls. Conclusion: Occipital condyle can be safely drilled for a distance of 12 mm from the posterior margin before encountering the hypoglossal canal. Surgeons operating in this area must consider the variations of parameters of south Indian skulls.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 634-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela G. Viers ◽  
Khoi D. Nguyen ◽  
Perounsack X. Moon ◽  
Scott E. Forseen ◽  
Ian M. Heger

OBJECTIVEOccipitocervical fusions in the pediatric population are rare but can be challenging because of the smaller anatomy. The procedure is even more exacting in patients with prior suboccipital craniectomy. A proposed method for occipitocervical fusion in such patients is the use of occipital condyle screws. There is very limited literature evaluating the pediatric occipital condyle for screw placement. The authors examined the occipital condyle in pediatric patients to determine if there was an age cutoff at which condylar screw placement is contraindicated.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective morphometric analysis of the occipital condyle in 518 pediatric patients aged 1 week–9 years old. Patients in their first decade of life whose occipital condyle was demonstrated on CT imaging in the period from 2009 to 2013 at the Augusta University Medical Center and Children’s Hospital of Georgia were eligible for inclusion in this study. Exclusion criteria were an age older than 10 years; traumatic, inflammatory, congenital, or neoplastic lesions of the occipital condyles; and any previous surgery of the occipitocervical junction. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed including calculation of the mean, standard deviation, and confidence intervals for all measurements. Probability values were calculated using the Student t-test with statistical significance determined by p < 0.05.RESULTSOverall, male patients had statistically significantly larger occipital condyles than the female patients, but this difference was not clinically significant. There was no significant difference in left versus right occipital condyles. There were statistically significant differences between age groups with a general trend toward older children having larger occipital condyles. Overall, 20.65% of all patients evaluated had at least one measurement that would prevent occipital condyle screw placement including at least one patient in every age group.CONCLUSIONSOccipital condyle screw fixation is feasible in pediatric patients younger than 10 years. More importantly, all pediatric patients should undergo critical evaluation of the occipital condyle in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes preoperatively to determine individual suitability for occipital condyle screw placement.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinsong Zhou ◽  
Alejandro A. Espinoza Orías ◽  
Xia Kang ◽  
Jade He ◽  
Zhihai Zhang ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE The segmental occipital condyle screw (OCS) is an alternative fixation technique in occipitocervical fusion. A thorough morphological study of the occipital condyle (OC) is critical for OCS placement. The authors set out to introduce a more precise CT-based method for morphometric analysis of the OC as it pertains to the placement of the segmental OCS, and they describe a novel preoperative simulation method for screw placement. Two new clinically relevant parameters, the height available for the OCS and the warning depth, are proposed. METHODS CT data sets from 27 fresh-frozen human cadaveric occipitocervical spines were used. All measurements were performed using a commercially available 3D reconstruction software package. The length, width, and sagittal angle of the condyle were measured in the axial plane at the base of the OC. The height of the OC and the height available for the segmental OCS were measured in the reconstructed oblique sagittal plane, fitting the ideal trajectory of the OCS recommended in the literature. The placement of a 3.5-mm-diameter screw that had the longest length of bicortical purchase was simulated into the OC in the oblique sagittal plane, with the screw path not being blocked by the occiput and not violating the hypoglossal canal cranially or the atlantooccipital joint caudally. The length of the simulated screw was recorded. The warning depth was measured as the shortest distance from the entry point of the screw to the posterior border of the hypoglossal canal. RESULTS The mean length and width of the OC were found to be larger in males: 22.2 ± 1.7 mm and 12.1 ± 1.0 mm, respectively, overall (p < 0.0001 for both). The mean sagittal angle was 28.0° ± 4.9°. The height available for the OCS was significantly less than the height of the OC (6.2 ± 1.3 mm vs 9.4 ± 1.5 mm, p < 0.0001). The mean screw length (19.3 ± 1.9 mm) also presented significant sex-related differences: male greater than female (p = 0.0002). The mean warning depth was 7.5 ± 1.7 mm. In 7.4% of the samples, although the height of the OC was viable, the height available for the OCS was less than 4.5 mm, thus making screw placement impractical. For these cases, a new preoperative simulation method of the OCS placement was proposed. In 92.6% of the samples that could accommodate a 3.5-mm-diameter screw, 24.0% showed that the entry point of the simulated screw was covered by a small part of the C-1 posterosuperior joint rim. CONCLUSIONS The placement of the segmental OCS is feasible in most cases, but a thorough preoperative radiological analysis is essential and cannot be understated. The height available for the OCS is a more clinically relevant and precise parameter than the height of the OC to enable proper screw placement. The warning depth may be helpful for the placement of the OCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document