scholarly journals How Do Physiotherapists Treat People with Knee Osteoarthritis and their evidence awareness: A cross-sectional survey among Indian Physiotherapists

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 3968-3973
Author(s):  
Pranav Saha ◽  
◽  
Tenzin Yangchen ◽  
Shaili Sharma ◽  
Jaspinder Kaur ◽  
...  

Background: Evidence-based practice in the field of physiotherapy is of utmost importance and is the way ahead. Physiotherapists' knowledge of evidence in terms of assessment and management of knee OA may influence the implementation of evidence-based practice. However, physiotherapist’s practice patterns are usually based on their professional experience or expert opinions. The present study aimed to explore the evidence awareness among Indian physiotherapists and identify their practice patterns in patients with knee OA. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among Indian physiotherapists. The survey was designed using current clinical practice guidelines and previously published similar studies. The survey consisted of three sections: (1) demographic details, (2) questions related to evidence awareness, (3) questions related to the practice patterns of Indian physiotherapists. The evidence awareness and practice patterns of physiotherapists were explored. Results: A total of 165 responses were received and analyzed. Most participants perceived footwear modifications (21.2%) and resistance exercises (44.2%) as having very strong evidence. Range of motion assessment and functional assessment was regarded as a must during the patient's initial visit. In terms of management strategies majority of the participants considered patient education (n=122), strengthening exercises (n=81), and therapeutic ultrasound (n=79) as their treatment of choice. Conclusion: Most physiotherapist assessment strategies were aimed at identifying impairments in patients. In line with the clinical practice guidelines, most physiotherapists use patient education and strengthening exercises to treat patients with knee OA. However, treatment modalities like ultrasound, TENS, and dry needling, which lack scientific support, are still being used by the physiotherapist. There is a lack of coherence between physiotherapists' evidence awareness and their choice of management strategies. KEY WORDS: Knee, Osteoarthritis, Survey, Resistance exercises.

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1631-1646
Author(s):  
Rinki Varindani Desai ◽  
Ashwini Namasivayam-MacDonald

Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the practice patterns of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) managing dysphagia in persons with dementia (PWD) in the United States. We wanted to investigate if clinicians are (a) adequately prepared to manage dysphagia in PWD, (b) confident in their ability to manage dysphagia in PWD, (c) performing comprehensive dysphagia assessments in PWD, and (d) using evidence-based techniques to manage dysphagia in PWD. Method A web-based survey comprising 32 questions was developed, field-tested, and distributed to members of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Special Interest Groups 13 and 15, as well as members of online SLP forums. Two hundred fifty-one responses were obtained and analyzed using descriptive methods. Results Respondents were experienced SLPs working primarily in acute care and skilled nursing facility settings. Their confidence in assessment and treatment was found to significantly increase with years of experience ( p < .001). The majority indicated more continuing education opportunities need to be offered related to managing dysphagia in PWD. Most reported using assessments that have not been validated for PWD. Clinical swallow examinations were utilized more frequently than instrumental exams to inform treatment planning. There was variability in the treatment techniques used to manage dysphagia in PWD, with a focus on use of compensatory strategies and providing caregiver training. Respondents listed several barriers to managing dysphagia in PWD and stated influences on their clinical decision making. Conclusions While some trends emerged regarding dysphagia practice patterns among SLPs managing PWD in the United States, a lack of consensus regarding best practices was apparent. The establishment of formal diagnostic standards, the elucidation of the underlying mechanisms of different types of dementia, and the development of evidence-based treatments for managing dysphagia in PWD could help improve SLP management of dysphagia in dementia and reduce the significant burden of this disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-186
Author(s):  
Mazen S Albaghdadi ◽  
Michael N Young ◽  
Mohammed M. Chowdhury ◽  
Susan Assmann ◽  
Taye Hamza ◽  
...  

Ascertainment bias is a well-recognized source of bias in research, but few studies have systematically analyzed sources of ascertainment bias in randomized trials in which blinding is not possible and endpoint assessment is not protocolized. In the current study, we sought to evaluate differences in the clinical practice patterns of trial investigators with respect to bias in the ascertainment of pre-revascularization patient risk and the incidence of secondary endpoints post-revascularization. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of active investigators ( n = 936) from the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial. The total survey response rate was 19.6% (183/936). Vascular surgeons were more likely than nonsurgical interventionalists to order tests for cardiac complications after both surgical bypass ( p < 0.001) and endovascular revascularization ( p = 0.038). Post-procedure, investigators were more likely to order additional testing for cardiac complications in open surgery versus endovascular cases (7% vs 16% never, 41% vs 65% rarely, 43% vs 17% sometimes, 9% vs 2% always, respectively; p < 0.0001). Significant variation in practice patterns exist in the pre- and post-procedure assessment of cardiac risk and events for patients with CLI undergoing revascularization. Variation in the ascertainment of risk and outcomes according to the type of revascularization procedure and physician specialty should be considered when interpreting the results of clinical studies, such as the BEST-CLI trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02060630


Author(s):  
Sandrine Roussel ◽  
Alain Deccache ◽  
Mariane Frenay

Introduction: The implementation of Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) remains a challenge. An exploratory study highlighted two tendencies among practitioners of TPE, which could hamper this implementation: an oscillation between identities (as caregivers versus as educators) and an inclination towards subjective psychological health objectives. Objectives: To verify whether these tendencies can be observed among an informed audience in TPE. Next, to explore the variables associated with one or other of these tendencies. Method: A quantitative cross-sectional survey by a self-administered questionnaire was carried out among 90 French-speaking healthcare professionals. Statistical analyses (chi-square, logistic regression) were then conducted. Results: Sixty percent of respondents displayed identity oscillation, which was found to be linked to task oscillation, patient curability, scepticism towards medicine and practising in France. Fifty-six percent pursued subjective psychological health objectives, which was found to be associated with health behaviour objectives and a locus of power in the healthcare relationship distinct from those seen in the pre-existing health models (biomedical, global). This tendency seems to constitute an alternative model of TPE. Discussion & conclusion: Identity oscillation and subjective psychological health objectives can be both observed. This study stresses the need to deliberate on the form(s) of TPE that is/are desired.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Lopez-Cano ◽  
Hobart W Harris ◽  
John P Fisher ◽  
Jose Antonio Pereira ◽  
Josep M Garcia-Alamino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard Alvarez ◽  
Cristian Justribo ◽  
Tobias Sundberg ◽  
Oliver P. Thomson ◽  
Matthew J. Leach

Abstract Background Although evidence-based practice (EBP) is largely supported across healthcare professions, its implementation in manual therapy professions such as osteopathy remains limited and debated. There is currently little knowledge of how Spanish osteopaths relate to EBP. Objectives The main aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes, skills and use of EBP among Spanish osteopaths. A secondary aim was to identify barriers and facilitators for the adoption of EBP in the Spanish osteopathic context. Methods National cross-sectional survey of Spanish osteopaths registered and non-registered to an osteopathic association in Spain. Eligible participants were invited by a range of recruitment strategies including email and social media campaigns to complete the Spanish-translated Evidence-Based practice Attitude and utilization Survey (EBASE) anonymously online. Results A total of 567 osteopaths completed the survey which represents an approximate response rate of 9%. Participant’s attitudes toward EBP were largely positive. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that EBP was necessary in the practice of osteopathy (89.6%) and that professional literature and research findings were useful to their day-to-day practice (88.9%). Levels of perceived skill in EBP were reported as low to moderate with lowest levels for items related to ‘research conduct’. Except reading/reviewing professional literature and using online search engines to find practice-related literature, participant engagement in all other EBP-related activities was generally infrequent. The perceived proportion of clinical practice that was based on clinical research evidence was reported to be very small. Main barriers to EBP uptake included a lack of clinical evidence in osteopathy and insufficient skills for applying research findings. Main facilitators of EBP uptake included access to full-text articles, internet at the workplace and online databases. Conclusions Spanish osteopaths were largely supportive of evidence-based practice, had low to moderate skills in EBP and engaged in EBP activities infrequently. Formal regulation of the profession in Spain and the inclusion of osteopathic programs into the university sector would potentially improve EBP skills and use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document