scholarly journals Towards a Normative Theory of the Intellectual Commons

Author(s):  
Antonios Broumas

Recapitulating earlier chapters that established the social value of commons-based activity the chapter offers a unified normative theory of the intellectual commons in support of an intellectual commons law. As the normative denouement of the book, this chapter down the foundations for the critical normative theory of the intellectual commons and the moral justification of an intellectual commons law and is structured into six interlinked sections starting with a statement of the basic tenets of a critical normative theory of the intellectual commons. The subsequent four sections examine the normative dimensions of the intellectual commons, i.e. personhood, work, value and community. Concluding sections briefly outline the contours of an intellectual commons law in alignment with the normative evaluations of the chapter. The ethical arguments of the model overall have established the moral grounds and present the framework for a distinct and independent body of law for the protection and promotion of the intellectual commons beyond the inherent limitations of intellectual property law.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonios Broumas

At the cutting edge of contemporary wealth creation people form self-governed communities of collaborative innovation in conditions of relative equipotency and produce resources with free access to all. The emergent intellectual commons have the potential to commonify intellectual production and distribution, unleash human creativity through collaboration and democratise innovation with wider positive effects for our societies. Contemporary intellectual property laws fail to address this potential. We are, therefore, in pressing need of an institutional alternative beyond the inherent limitations of intellectual property law. This book offers an overall analysis of the moral significance of the intellectual commons and outlines appropriate modes for their regulation. Its principal thesis is that our legal systems are in need of an independent body of law for the protection and promotion of the intellectual commons, in parallel to intellectual property law. In this context, the author of the book proposes the reconstruction of the doctrine of the public domain and the exceptions and limitations of exclusive intellectual property rights into an intellectual commons law, which will underpin a vibrant non-commercial zone of creativity and innovation in intellectual production, distribution and consumption alongside commodity markets enabled by intellectual property law.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Silbey

In this Essay, I review and elaborate on Dan's Burk's On the Sociology of Patenting with three "heuristic interventions" for the study of intellectual property law. These interventions derive from sociology and anthropology, and to some extent also from critical literary theory. Unoriginal in the social sciences, these heuristic interventions remain largely original to the study of law within law schools and traditional legal scholarship (as opposed to the study of law from within the social sciences and humanities). Burk joins a small but growing group of legal scholars, reaching beyond legal doctrinal analysis and the economic analysis of law to explain intellectual property law as a social practice. The interventions he begins and this essay explains in further depth reframe the understanding or analysis of intellectual property (1) from individuals to institutions, (2) from causation to explanation and (3) in the context of the domestication of IP in contemporary social and political culture. In this way, Burk's Article and this essay demonstrate how law (not only intellectual property or patent law) is a social practice both reflecting and forming social structures, the understanding of which requires attention to organization and culture as much or more than statutes, cases, administrative filings, and economic theory.


Author(s):  
О. І. Харитонова

Питання охорони прав інтелектуальної власності є на сьогоднішній день дуже акту­альним та, на жаль, недостатньо розробленим. Аспекти, розглянуті в даній статті, дають підстави розрізняти види цивільних правовідносин інтелектуальної власності на ав­торські правовідносини; правовідносини, суміжні з авторськими; правовідносини промис­лової власності; правовідносини, суміжні з правовідносинами промислової власності; індивідуалізаційні правовідносини інтелектуальної власності (правовідносини індивідуа­лізації). Даний розподіл дозволяє охопити всі сфери суспільного життя інституту права інтелектуальної власності.    Intellectual rights protection is an urgent, but unfortunately not well developed issue today. The aspects, which have been considered in this article, provide a basis for distinguishing between different types of intellectual legal relationships, such as author and allied legal relationships, industrial property and allied legal relationships, identifying intellectual property legal relationships (legal relationships of identification). This classification integrates all the social spheres of intellectual property law institute.


Author(s):  
Mark J. Davison ◽  
Ann L. Monotti ◽  
Leanne Wiseman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document