Hydrologic and hydraulic model development for flood mitigation and routing method comparison in Soap Creek Watershed, Iowa

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyun Sun
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Chen ◽  
Sajjad Ahmad ◽  
Ajay Kalra

Abstract. In Coupled Groundwater and Surface-Water Flow (GSFLOW) model, the three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater model (MODFLOW) plays a critical role of groundwater flow simulation, together with which the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) simulates the surface hydrologic processes. While the model development of each individual PRMS and MODFLOW model requires tremendous time and efforts, further integration development of these two models exerts additional concerns and issues due to different simulation realm, data communication, and computation algorithms. To address these concerns and issues in GSFLOW, the present paper proposes a conceptual framework from perspectives of: Model Conceptualization, Data Linkages and Transference, Model Calibration, and Sensitivity Analysis. As a demonstration, a MODFLOW groundwater flow system was developed and coupled with the PRMS model in the Lehman Creek watershed, eastern Nevada, resulting in a smooth and efficient integration as the hydrogeologic features were well captured and represented. The proposed conceptual integration framework with techniques and concerns identified substantially improves GSFLOW model development efficiency and help better model result interpretations. This may also find applications in other integrated hydrologic modelings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1093-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. López-Barrera ◽  
P. García-Navarro ◽  
P. Brufau ◽  
J. Burguete

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa C. Henderson ◽  
Derek A. St. John ◽  
Brian L. Long

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Hamill ◽  
Jeremy J. Giovando ◽  
Chandler S. Engel ◽  
Travis A. Dahl ◽  
Michael D. Bartles

The ability to simulate snow accumulation and melting processes is fundamental to developing real-time hydrological models in watersheds with a snowmelt-dominated flow regime. A primary source of uncertainty with this model development approach is the subjectivity related to which historical periods to use and how to combine parameters from multiple calibration events. The Hydrologic Engineering Center, Hydrological Modeling System, has recently implemented a hybrid temperature index (TI) snow module that has not been extensively tested. This study evaluates a radiatative temperature index (RTI) model’s performance relative to the traditional air TI model. The TI model for Willow Creek performed reasonably well in both the calibration and validation years. The results of the RTI calibration and validation simulations resulted in additional questions related to how best to parameterize this snow model. An RTI parameter sensitivity analysis indicates that the choice of calibration years will have a substantial impact on the parameters and thus the streamflow results. Based on the analysis completed in this study, further refinement and verification of the RTI model calculations are required before an objective comparison with the TI model can be completed.


1965 ◽  
Vol 3 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L. Brakensiek ◽  
G.H. Comer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document