Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of patients with a disco-radicular conflict of the lumbar spine

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
V. A. Byvaltsev ◽  
A. A. Kalinin ◽  
A. V. Egorov ◽  
A. K. Okoneshnikova
2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 401-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim A. Byvaltsev ◽  
Andrey A. Kalinin ◽  
Victoria Yu. Goloborodko

Background: The provision of surgical care in the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine in patients with obesity and obesity is associated with significant risks of anesthesia and the development of perioperative complications. Aims: to analyze the results of the introduction of a combination of surgical procedures and anesthesia in the treatment of multilevel degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine in patients with excessive body weight and obesity.Materials and methods: The results of surgical treatment of 86 patients were studied, 2 groups were identified. In the study group (SG, n=37), minimally invasive surgical techniques and original surgical approach, paravertebral musculature infiltration with bupivacaine with epinephrine, and multimodal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine were used. The comparison group (CG, n=49) consisted of patients who used the technique of traditional open transpedicular fixation in combination with the posterior interbody fusion without the above combination of surgical procedures and anesthesia. Observation and clinical evaluation was performed in the early (during hospitalization) and in the distant (on average 36 months) postoperative periods.Results: In SG there were no changes in hemodynamics and better results were obtained on the speed of recovery of psychomotor functions. The use of local anesthetics significantly reduced the local pain syndrome (p0.05) and the need for analgesics (p=0.002). Comparative analysis in the main group revealed significantly better results in indices of the duration of the operation [SG 145 (105; 155) min, CG 185 (100; 205) min; p=0.02], the volume of blood loss [SG 110 (90; 140) ml, CG 510 (390; 640) ml; p0.001], the activation time [SG 1 (1; 2) days, CG 3 (3; 4) days; p=0.01], the length of hospitalization [SG 10 (9; 11) days, CG 13 (12; 15) days; p=0,03], remote clinical parameters of the pain syndrome level from the visual analogue scale in the lower extremities [SG 3 (1; 4) mm, CG 9 (6; 14) mm; p=0.006] and the lumbar spine [SG 6 (4; 9) mm, CG 16 (11; 21) mm; p=0.001], functional state according to ODI [SG 8 (6; 10) points, CG 16 (12; 24) points; p=0.008], subjective satisfaction with the operation performed on the Macnab scale (p=0.01). The number of postoperative complications in SG was 8%, in CG ― 18% (p=0.006).Conclusions: Analysis of the results of the introduction of a combination of surgical and anesthetic support methods in the treatment of multilevel degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine in patients with overweight and obesity, including minimally invasive surgical techniques, infiltration of paravertebral muscles with bupivacaine and epinephrine, multimodal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine showed its high perioperative safety, low number of complications, as well as better and clinical outcomes in the early and late postoperative periods.


2018 ◽  
Vol 177 (6) ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
E. A. Tseimakh ◽  
V. A. Bombizo ◽  
P. N. Buldakov ◽  
A. A. Averkina ◽  
D. N. Ustinov ◽  
...  

The objectiveis to study the results of different methods of surgical treatment of patients with infected pancreonecrosis and to conduct a comparative analysis of minimally invasive and traditional surgical interventions.Material and methods.The results of treatment of 206 patients with infected pancreonecrosis were analyzed. In accordance with the used method of surgical treatment, the patients were divided into 2 groups: 105 (51.0%) patients with “traditional” open interventions were included in the first group (comparison), and 101 (49.0%) patients treated with various miniinvasive technologies, or a combination of minimally invasive and “open” interventions were included in the second group.Results.It was found that the mortality rate in the second group was less than in the first group by 12.8% (p<0.05).Conclusion.Minimally invasive surgical techniques are the method of choice for delimited pancreatogenic ulcers. The use of combined surgical interventions leads to a significant reduction of postoperative mortality and duration of inpatient treatment.


1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry M. Parker ◽  
Paul C. McAfee ◽  
Ira L. Fedder ◽  
James C. Weis ◽  
W. Peter Geis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. E620-E622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Taghva ◽  
Khan W. Li ◽  
John C. Liu ◽  
Ziya L. Gokaslan ◽  
Patrick C. Hsieh

Abstract OBJECTIVE Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression is a potentially devastating complication of cancer and is estimated to occur in 5% to 14% of all cancer patients. It is best treated surgically. Minimally invasive spine surgery has the potential benefits of decreased surgical approach–related morbidity, blood loss, hospital stay, and time to mobilization. CLINICAL PRESENTATION A 36-year-old man presented with worsening back pain and lower extremity weakness. Workup revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung with spinal cord compression at T4 and T5. INTERVENTION AND TECHNIQUE T4 and T5 vertebrectomy with expandable cage placement and T1–T8 pedicle screw fixation and fusion were performed using minimally invasive surgical techniques. RESULT The patient improved neurologically and was ambulatory on postoperative day 1. At the 9-month follow-up point, he remained neurologically intact and pain free, and there was no evidence of hardware failure. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive surgical circumferential decompression may be a viable option for the treatment of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Andrea La Maida ◽  
Laura Serena Giarratana ◽  
Alberto Acerbi ◽  
Valentina Ferrari ◽  
Giuseppe Vincenzo Mineo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document