scholarly journals Lessons on Parental Leave: A Comparative Analysis of Parental Leave in South Africa and the United Kingdom

Obiter ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-805
Author(s):  
Asheelia Behari
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Maternity Leave ◽  
Parental Leave ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Participation Of Women ◽  
Labour Participation ◽  
The Right

Recent amendments to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 have resulted in the introduction of parental leave. This provides employees with 10 consecutive days of time off from work to care for their newborn babies and may commence from the day of the birth. The right to parental leave has the additional benefit of impacting gendered social assumptions that place women in the primary role of caregiver and a secondary role as worker. With the rise in the labour participation of women, there has been an increase in the need for the involvement of men in the caregiving and upbringing of children in the home. Although parental leave applies to men and women, it has been enacted with the objective of encouraging working fathers to participate as caregivers and to share in the burden of care placed on new mothers to care for themselves and their newborn babies during maternity leave. This article considers the effects of parental leave as a recent addition to South African law by conducting a comparative analysis with the long-established parental leave models of the United Kingdom. These include the right to parental leave that is applicable to a parent who has parental responsibility for a child, and a right to shared parental leave, which allows the mother of the child to share her maternity leave with the other parent of the child. The parental leave rights of the United Kingdom have been developed to provide employees with choice and flexibility to accommodate their caregiving responsibilities, and may indicate a trajectory for the progression of the newly enacted right to parental leave in South Africa.

scholarly journals Mothers and others: Transgender birth, birth registration and the rights of the child, with a focus on the United Kingdom and South Africa

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-223
Author(s):  
Julia SlothNielsen ◽  
Rachel SlothNielsen
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Gender Identity ◽  
Birth Certificate ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Birth Registration ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Legal Situation ◽  
The Right

The review concerns the position of the identification as ‘mother’ or ‘father’ of trans persons who give birth. This matter has occupied courts in the United Kingdom, Germany, Brazil and Sweden recently, and could well arise in South Africa, our country of origin. The first part of the discussion relates to a claim of a trans man who gave birth to be registered as the father of the child. The legal situation in South Africa and the United Kingdom is compared, and particular focus is placed on the meaning of ‘mother’. A second issue for discussion relates to the right of the child born to a trans person to birth registration, notably, what the child’s interests are in relation to his or her parent’s identification details on his or her birth certificate. We conclude that the gender identity of the trans parent must be the primary factor determining his or her registration as a parent on the birth certificate, and that this solution also better serves the child’s best interests.

scholarly journals Revisiting the contractual effect of the company’s constitution in corporate operations

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 649-657
Author(s):  
Anthony O. Nwafor
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Made In

The extent to which a company’s constitution defines the relationships between the company, its members and officers as such have been a subject of debate. A number of varying judicial decisions and academic opinions have been expressed on these issues. The controversies are embedded in the manner of drafting of the relevant provisions of the regulating instruments with the attendant difficulties in interpretation. In recent times the parliament in some jurisdictions have intervened by enacting laws intended to introduce some level of clarity into the debated issues. The paper examines, by a comparative analysis, the provisions in the Companies Acts of the United Kingdom, Nigeria and South Africa. While a significant improvement seems to have been made in those jurisdictions in redefining the contractual effects of the companies’ constitution in their respective extant companies’ legislation, the gale of controversy on the enforcement of those contracts are far from settled

Human Biobanking in Developed and Developing Countries: An Ethico-Legal Comparative Analysis of the Frameworks in the United Kingdom, Australia, Uganda, and South Africa

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-160
Author(s):  
SAFIA MAHOMED
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Biobank Research ◽  
International Collaborations ◽  
Consistent Manner ◽  
Legal Frameworks ◽  
Over Time

AbstractAlthough the concept of biobanking is not new, the open and evolving nature of biobanks has created profound ethical, legal, and social implications, including issues around informed consent, community engagement, secondary uses of materials over time, ownership of materials, data sharing, and privacy. Complexities also emerge because of increasing international collaborations and differing national positions. In addition, the degrees and topics of concern vary as legislative, ethical, and social frameworks differ across developed and developing countries. Implementing national laws in an internationally consistent manner is also problematic. However, these concerns should not cause countries, especially developing countries, to lag behind as this novel wave of research gains momentum, particularly while several biobank initiatives are already underway in the developing world. As the law has always struggled to keep up with the fast-evolving scientific arena, this article seeks to identify the ethico-legal frameworks in place in the United Kingdom, Australia, Uganda, and South Africa, for human biobank research, in an attempt to compare and contextualize the approaches to human biobanking in specific developed and developing countries.

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis of Director Tenure in South Africa and Selected International Jurisdictions

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehana Cassim
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
South African ◽  
The South ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Governance Practices

Director tenure attracts attention worldwide and is increasingly being recognised as a crucial element in assessing an external (independent non-executive) director’s independence. Director tenure has recently come under the spotlight in South Africa. Shareholder activists are expressing disapproval of lengthy tenures of directors serving on boards of listed public companies and exerting pressure on long-serving directors to resign from office. This article examines whether the South African corporate governance principles regulating director tenure are adequate or in need of revision. The article examines further the corporate governance practices in leading jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, and India that have recently revised their corporate governance practices. It then makes recommendations for enhancing the South African corporate governance approach to director tenure. It also calls on directors to collaborate with shareholders and independent external experts to examine their approach to director tenure and, if circumstances allow, revise the company’s memorandum of incorporation to limit directors’ tenure or provide for a staggered rotation of directors on the board.

Dismissal during Probationary Period of Employment in South Africa: An International Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-498
Author(s):  
Paul Smit ◽  
Joaquin Grobler
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
International Perspective ◽  
International Standards ◽  
International Labour Organisation ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
General Terms ◽  
The Right ◽  
Probationary Period

It is a universally acceptable practice to employ newly hired employees on a probationary period. In general terms the purpose of probation is to give the employer an opportunity to evaluate the employee's performance before confirming the appointment. This in itself seems to be an uncomplicated process; however, the scenario, especially in South Africa, becomes more complicated if an employer wants to terminate an employee's service during the probationary period of employment or terminate the services of an employee at the end of the probationary period. The right to a fair dismissal is well recognised in South African labour law; this right also extends to employees during their probationary period of employment. Convention 158 of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) provides guidelines in respect of the termination of employment, also during the probation period. In this article the ILO's standards with regard to the termination of employment during probation are considered. South Africa was a former colony of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, in light of this the respective positions on dismissal during the probation period of employment in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are also analysed. This provided the researcher with an opportunity to determine if South Africa's dismissal regime during the probationary period of employment is in line with some international perspectives and it appears that dismissal during the probationary period of employment in South Africa is out of step with international standards and developments.

Strike Ballots, Democracy, and Law

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Breen Creighton ◽  
Catrina Denvir ◽  
Richard Johnstone ◽  
Shae McCrystal ◽  
Alice Orchiston
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
The United States ◽  
International Labour Organisation ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Strike Activity ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Worked Example ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Democratic Rights ◽  
The Right

The purpose of the research upon which this book is based was empirically to investigate whether the ballot requirements in the Fair Work Act do indeed impose a significant obstacle to the taking of industrial action, and whether those provisions are indeed impelled by a legitimate ‘democratic imperative’. The book starts from the proposition that virtually all national legal systems, and international law, recognise the right to strike as a fundamental human right. It acknowledges, however, that in no case is this recognition without qualification. Amongst the most common qualifications is a requirement that to be lawful strike action must first be approved by a ballot of workers concerned. Often, these requirements are said to be necessary to protect the democratic rights of the workers concerned: this is the so-called ‘democratic imperative’. In order to evaluate the true purpose and effect of ballot requirements the book draws upon the detailed empirical study of the operation of the Australian legislative provisions noted above; a comparative analysis of law and practice in a broad range of countries, with special reference to Canada, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States; and the jurisprudence of the supervisory bodies of the International Labour Organisation. It finds that in many instances ballot requirements – especially those relating to quorum – are more concerned with curtailing strike activity than with constructively responding to the democratic imperative. Frequently, they also proceed from a distorted perception of what ‘democracy’ could and should entail in an industrial context. Paradoxically, the study also finds that in some contexts ballot requirements can provide additional bargaining leverage for unions. Overall, however, the study confirms our hypothesis that the principal purpose of ballot requirements – especially in Australia and the United Kingdom – is to curtail strike activity rather than to vindicate the democratic imperative, other than on the basis of a highly attenuated reading of that term. We believe that the end-result constitutes an important study of the practical operation of a complex set of legal rules, and one which exposes the dichotomy between the ostensible and real objectives underpinning the adoption of those rules. It also furnishes a worked example of multi-methods empirical, comparative and doctrinal legal research in law, which we hope will inspire similar approaches to other areas of labour law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document