A comparative study of the therapeutic efficacy of vertical oscillatory pressure and transverse oscillatory pressure in the management of Chronic Low Back Pain

BACKGROUND: The use of physical modalities in treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is potentially beneficial, but the general evidence still leaves questions about its security application. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate and compare the relative efficacy of Vertical Oscillatory Pressure (VOP) and Transverse Oscillatory Pressure (TOP) in the management chronic low back pain (CLBP) of mechanical origin. METHODS: A two-group, quasi-experimental design was utilized, involving a total of forty-two participants purposively recruited with due consideration of the specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five research questions were raised with corresponding hypotheses formulated for them, which were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The participants were randomly assigned to the VOP and TOP groups, and were subsequently managed thrice weekly for a duration of six weeks. The pain intensity rating, straight leg raising, and spinal range of motion were the outcome measures selected, which were assessed before and after treatment. Data were collected, organized, and analyzed using descriptive and T-Student test analytical statistics. RESULTS: The results of the study showed a significant difference in each of the outcome measures for both groups (p<0,05). CONCLUSION: This suggested that both VOP and VOP were relatively effective in managing CLBP.

Download Full-text

Association of Serum Serotonin and Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain before and after Spinal Surgery

Pain Research and Treatment ◽

10.1155/2018/4901242 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Afshin Farhanchi ◽

Behrouz Karkhanei ◽

Negar Amani ◽

Mashhood Aghajanloo ◽

Elham Khanlarzadeh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Numerical Rating Scale ◽

Low Back ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After ◽

Postoperative Serum ◽

Serum Serotonin

Introduction. In this study we are aiming to evaluate the changes of serum serotonin and its association with pain in patients suffering from chronic low back pain before and after lumbar discectomy surgery. Patients and Methods. A prospective study was performed on the patients referring to the outpatient clinic in Besat hospital, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, during 2016. A 2 mL fasting blood sample was collected from each patient at preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 14 and they were measured for level of serum serotonin. Besides, all patients were asked for severity of their low back pain in preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 14 and scored their pain from zero to ten using a Numerical Rating Scale. Results. Forty patients with the mean age of 47 ± 13 yrs/old (range 25–77) including 15 (37.5%) males were enrolled into the study. The overall mean score of preoperative pain was significantly decreased from 7.4 ± 2.18 (range 4–10) to the postoperative pain score 3.87 ± 2.92 (range 0–10) (P < .001). The overall levels of pre- and postoperative serum serotonin were 3.37 ± 1.27 (range 1.1–6.4) and 3.58 ± 1.32 (range .94–7.1) ng/mL, respectively, with no significant difference (P = .09). The levels of pre- and postoperative serum serotonin were significantly higher in males and patients older than 50 yrs/old compared to the females and patients younger than 50 yrs/old, respectively (P = .03 and .005, respectively). A significant inverse correlation between the postoperative levels of pain and serum serotonin was observed (r = -.36 and P = .02). Conclusion. A negative medium strength linear relationship may exist between the postoperative serum serotonin and low back pain.

Download Full-text

Low back pain: Differential diagnosis, prognosis and treatment

Acta chirurgica iugoslavica ◽

10.2298/aci0604049l ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 53 (4) ◽

pp. 49-52

Author(s):

V. Lalosevic ◽

Z. Poleksic ◽

Z. Blagojevic ◽

S. Tomic ◽

S. Milickovic

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Orthopedic Surgery ◽

Surgical Care ◽

Blood Analysis ◽

Low Back ◽

Visual Analog Scales ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After ◽

Treatment Data

From January 2002 to February 2003, 137 patients complaining of low back pain were treated at the Institute for Orthopedic Surgery "Banjica", Belgrade, Serbia. There were 89 male and 48 female patients aged 13 to 77, mean age 42.2. Their condition was diagnosed through use of radiography, CT, MRI, EMNG, standard battery of neurological tests, and laboratory analyses (urine and blood analysis). Surgical treatment was performed on 39 patients; all other patients received some form of non-surgical care (physical therapy, medication or corset). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by use of the visual analog scales (VAS) and the Oswestry index, before and after treatment. The use Wilcoxon?s pair test revealed statistically significant difference between before and after treatment data on VAS and Oswestry index for all patients.

Download Full-text

Assessment of pain in patients with chronic low back pain before and after application of the isostreching method

Fisioterapia em Movimento ◽

10.1590/0103-5150.028.004.ao14 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 28 (4) ◽

pp. 767-777

Author(s):

Pedro Henrique Brito da Silva ◽

Suely Maria Satoko Moriya Inumaru

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Control Group ◽

Low Back ◽

Evaluation Period ◽

Post Evaluation ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After ◽

Experimental Group

Abstract Introduction : Chronic low back pain is defined as a painful disorder located between the first and the fifth lumbar vertebra and it is considered to be an important public health problem. In Brazil, approximately 10 million people are disabled as a result of this condition. Objective : To assess pain intensity and functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain before and after application of the Isostreching method. Case studies and methods : In this randomized, controlled experimental trial, 14 female individuals with chronic low back pain, aged 45-60 years, divided into control group (CG) and experimental group (EG), with 7 individuals each, twelve 45-minute sessions were held, in which 9 postures of Isostreching method were carried out in the experimental group. The control group did not undergo intervention. A sociodemographic questionnaire, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability questionnaire were used before and after the study period in both groups. Results : The assessment of pain and disability in the pre-evaluation period showed no statistically significant difference, whereas scores of pain and disability in the post-evaluation period between the two groups showed a statistically significant difference. The CG also showed no statistical difference for the VAS and Oswestry scores between the pre- and post-evaluation periods, in which it was observed an increase in the pain and disability mean scores between those periods and the experimental group showed significant difference between the scores obtained in these two different periods, before and after collection. Conclusion : it is suggested that the method was effective for the group studied and proved to be suitable for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Download Full-text

Long-term improvements following a residential combined physical and psychological programme for chronic low back pain

BMJ Open Quality ◽

10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001068 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. e001068

Author(s):

Shaun Wellburn ◽

Cormac G Ryan ◽

Andrew Coxon ◽

Alastair J Dickson ◽

D John Dickson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Low Back ◽

Residential Setting ◽

Wide Range

ObjectivesEvaluate the outcomes and explore experiences of patients undergoing a residential combined physical and psychological programme (CPPP) for chronic low back pain.DesignA longitudinal observational cohort design, with a parallel qualitative design using semistructured interviews.SettingResidential, multimodal rehabilitation.Participants136 adults (62 male/74 female) referred to the CPPP, 100 (44 male/56 female) of whom completed the programme, during the term of the study. Ten (2 male/8 female) participated in the qualitative evaluation.InterventionA 3-week residential CPPP.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome measures were the STarT Back screening tool score; pain intensity—11-point Numerical Rating Scale; function—Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); health status/quality of life—EQ-5D-5L EuroQol five-Dimension-five level; anxiety—Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; depression—Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Secondary outcome measures were the Global Subjective Outcome Scale; National Health Service Friends and Family Test;.ResultsAt discharge, 6 and 12 months follow ups, there were improvements from baseline that were greater than minimum clinically important differences in each of the outcomes (with the sole exception of ODI at discharge). At 12 months, the majority of people considered themselves a lot better (57%) and were extremely likely (86%) to recommend the programme to a friend. The qualitative data showed praise for the residential nature of the intervention and the opportunities for interaction with peers and peer support. There were testimonies of improvements in understanding of pain and how to manage it better. Some participants said they had reduced, or stopped, medication they had been taking to manage their pain.ConclusionsParticipants improved, and maintained long term, beyond minimum clinically important differences on a wide range of outcomes. Participants reported an enhanced ability to self-manage their back pain and support for the residential setting.

Download Full-text

Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Have an Additive Effect on Disability, Pain and Abdominal and Lumbar Muscle Thickness in Chronic Low Back Pain? – A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Study

Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin ◽

10.1055/a-1577-9849 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ecenur Atli ◽

Dilber Karagozoglu Coskunsu ◽

Zeynep Turan ◽

Ozden Ozyemisci Taskiran

Keyword(s):

Electrical Stimulation ◽

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽

Muscle Thickness ◽

Transversus Abdominis ◽

Control Group ◽

Low Back

Abstract Objective To examine the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with core stabilization exercises (CSE) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods Thirty-six patients (mean age 33.6±12.6 years) with CLBP were randomly assigned to 4 weeks (12 sessions) of NMES group (NMES combined with CSE) (n=18) vs. Control group (sham NMES and CSE) (n=18). After the 4 weeks, same exercises were given as home exercise program without NMES. The outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and ultrasonography. Ultrasonography was used for measuring transversus abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO), external oblique (EO) muscles thickness and lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and area. Assessments were performed at baseline and 4th week and eighth week follow-up. Results In both groups, the change of ODI, VAS and NHP values of the first measurement according to the values of the 4th week and the eighth week were found statistically significant (p=0.001; p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in ODI, VAS and NHP scores between the 4th week and the eighth week in both groups (p>0.05). None of NMES and control group measurements with US showed a statistically significant increase in the TrA, IO, EO thickness and multifidus thickness and area (p>0.05). Conclusions It was shown that NMES can be tolerated by patients with CLBP, but the addition of simultaneus NMES to CSE had no contribution to the clinical outcome measures.

Download Full-text

77 Comparison between Swiss Ball Exercise and Sling Exercise on Lumbar Stability and Postural Stability in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

Age and Ageing ◽

10.1093/ageing/afz164.77 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽

pp. iv18-iv27

Author(s):

Apinkarn Jaroenlarp ◽

Pitsinee Fuengjit ◽

Jirapat Sukeeyuti ◽

Parichart Sophap ◽

Chadarat Chirasaengthong

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Functional Disability ◽

Sagittal Plane ◽

Postural Sway ◽

Neuromuscular Control ◽

Coronal Plane ◽

Low Back ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Objective This study was to comparison of level of lumbar stability and postural sway in sagittal plane and coronal plane between exercise with ball and sling in the patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). Methodology Twenty participants with NCLBP aged 20 to 55 years were randomly divided into exercise with ball group (BG) and exercise with sling group (SG). Both groups performed 8 exercise sessions; two times per week for four weeks. The visual analog scale (VAS), modified oswestry disability questionnaire (MODQ), modified isometric stability test (MIST) were used to measure at baseline, week 2 and week 4 after exercise. Moreover, the sway area and sway velocity were evaluated at before and after training. Both group performed exercise 15 repetitions per set for 3 sets with 1-minute resting between set. A repeated two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the difference variables between both groups. Results The results showed significant difference between pre and post treatment of pain intensity, functional disability, MIST and postural sway in both groups (p<.001). When compared between both groups, the reduction in all parameters for the BG group was significantly higher than the SG group (p<.05). Moreover, the findings represented that the postural sway in both sagittal and coronal plane showed no significant difference between both groups after complete treatment. Conclusion The core stabilization exercise with ball and with sling can provided reduction of pain and functional disability. Moreover, the BG group is more effective for decreasing of pain, disability and improving of lumbar stability may described by greater perturbation of the ball. During perform exercise on ball bring to unstable and increasing of neuromuscular control. These results can applied to clinical practice for choosing the appropriate exercise program in the patients with NCLBP.

Download Full-text

Can We Convert Between Outcome Measures of Disability for Chronic Low Back Pain?

Spine ◽

10.1097/brs.0000000000000866 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 40 (10) ◽

pp. 734-739 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Tom Morris ◽

Siew Wan Hee ◽

Nigel Stallard ◽

Martin Underwood ◽

Shilpa Patel

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Low Back

Download Full-text

Assessment of effectiveness of spinal exercises and body mechanics on low back pain among post menopausal women

International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research ◽

10.7439/ijasr.v1i4.2082 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 1 (4) ◽

pp. 191 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Angel Rajakumari G ◽

Soli T. K. ◽

Malathy D

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Control Group ◽

Low Back ◽

Menopausal Women ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Post Test ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Equivalent Control ◽

Post Menopausal

Aim: To assessment of effectiveness of spinal exercises and body mechanics on low back pain among post menopausal women.Participants and setting: A quasi experimental non equivalent control group pretest post test design was adapted. The study was conducted in the urban area of suryapet. 40 post menopausal women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected by nonprobability purposive sampling technique.Intervention: The intervention such as spinal exercises and body mechanics were performed to overcome the level of low back pain among post menopausal women. The pre and post assessment was done by using a combined numerical and categorical pain scale.Measurement and findings: The women completed the demographic and obstetrical information and pain was measured by 0- 10 Modified combined numerical categorical pain intensity scale. This study revealed that there was high significant difference found in low back pain at p<0.001level between study group.Conclusion: The overall findings in the present study revealed that the spinal exercises and body mechanics was effectives and had brought about significant change in the reduction of low back pain among post menopausal women compared to pre test level of low back pain.

Download Full-text

Changes in Muscle Thickness After Exercise and Biofeedback in People With Low Back Pain

Journal of Sport Rehabilitation ◽

10.1123/jsr.2013-0057 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 23 (4) ◽

pp. 307-318 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Shandi L. Partner ◽

Mark Alan Sutherlin ◽

Shellie Acocello ◽

Susan A. Saliba ◽

Eric M. Magrum ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Muscle Thickness ◽

Transversus Abdominis ◽

Group Differences ◽

Low Back ◽

Lateral Abdominal Wall ◽

Percent Change ◽

Before And After

Context:Individuals with low back pain (LBP) have reduced function of the transversus abdominis (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles. Biofeedback during exercise may increase the ability to contract the TrA and LM muscles compared with exercise alone.Objective:To compare TrA preferential activation ratio (PAR) and the percent change in LM-muscle thickness in patients with LBP history before and after exercise with or without biofeedback.Design:Controlled laboratory study.Setting:University research laboratory.Patients:20 LBP individuals, 10 exercise alone and 10 exercise with biofeedback.Interventions:Patients were allotted to tabletop exercises in isolation or tabletop exercises with visual, auditory, and tactile biofeedback.Main Outcome Measures:TrA PAR and percent change in LM-muscle thickness.Results:There were no differences between groups at baseline (all P > .05). Nonparametric statistics showed decreased resting muscle thickness for total lateral abdominal-wall muscles (P = .007) but not TrA (P = .410) or LM (P = .173). Percent TrA thickness increased from table to standing positions before (P = .006) and after exercise (P = .009). TrA PAR increased after exercise (pre 0.01 ± 0.02, post 0.03 ± 0.04, P = .033) for all patients and for exercise with biofeedback (pre 0.02 ± 0.01, post 0.03 ± 0.01, P = .037) but not for exercise alone (pre 0.01 ± 0.02, post 0.02 ± 0.05, P = .241). No group differences were observed for TrA PAR before (exercise 0.01 ± 0.02, exercise with biofeedback 0.02 ± 0.01, P = .290) or after exercise (exercise 0.02 ± 0.05, exercise with biofeedback 0.03 ± 0.01, P = .174). There were no group differences in LM percent change before exercise (P = .999) or after exercise (P = .597). In addition, no changes were observed in LM percent change as a result of exercise among all participants (P = .391) or for each group (exercise P = .508, exercise with biofeedback P = .575).Conclusion:TrA PAR increased after a single session of exercises, whereas no thickness changes occurred in LM.

Download Full-text