‘Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (Chinese)’ to evaluate student performance during clinical placements v1 (protocols.io.6z9hf96)

protocols.io ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
xuelian zhou ◽  
Jia Hu ◽  
Alice Jones
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Fulton ◽  
Kerry Myatt ◽  
Garry W Kirwan ◽  
Courtney R Clark ◽  
Megan Dalton

Abstract Background: During workplace based clinical placements, best practice in assessment dictates that students should expect consistency between assessors rating their performance. To assist clinical educators (CEs) to provide a consistent assessment of physiotherapy student performance, nine paediatric vignettes depicting various standards of student performance, as assessed by the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP), were developed. The project aimed to evaluate the consistency of physiotherapy educators assessing student competence in a paediatric setting using video vignettes alongside the APP. Methods: Thirty-six CEs, with minimum 3-years clinical experience and had supervised a student within the past year, were sent three videos at four-week intervals. Videos depicted the same clinical scenario, however student performance varied with each video. Consistency among raters was assessed using percentage agreement to establish reliability. Results: The vignettes were assessed a combined total of 60 times. Across scenarios, percentage agreement at the not adequate level was 100%, and combining adequate or better, percentage agreement was >86%. The study demonstrated strong consensus when comparing not adequate to adequate or better student performance. Importantly, no student performance scripted as not adequate was passed by any assessor. Conclusions: Experienced educators demonstrate consistency in identifying a not adequate from adequate or better performance when assessing a one-off student performance using the APP. These validated video vignettes will be a valuable training tool to improve educator consistency when assessing student performance in paediatric physiotherapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Tuttle ◽  
Sean A. Horan

Abstract Background Simulation-based learning (SBL) activities are increasingly used to replace or supplement clinical placements for physiotherapy students. There is limited literature evaluating SBL activities that replace on-campus teaching, and to our knowledge, no studies evaluate the role of SBL in counteracting the negative impact of delay between content teaching and clinical placements. The aims of this study were to (i) determine the effect on clinical placement performance of replacing 1 week of content teaching with a SBL activity and (ii) determine if a delay between content teaching and clinical placement impacted clinical placement performance. Methods This study is a retrospective cohort study. Participants included students in the first two clinical placements of a graduate-entry, masters-level program. Six hundred twenty-nine student placements were analysed—285 clinical placements where students undertook a 20-h SBL activity immediately prior to clinical placement were compared with 344 placements where students received traditional content. Of the placements where students received the SBL, 147 occurred immediately following content teaching and 138 had a delay of at least 5 weeks. Performance on clinical placement was assessed using the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP). Results There was a significant main effect of SBL with higher APP marks for the experimental group (3.12/4, SD = 0.25 vs 3.01/4, SD = 0.22), and post hoc analysis indicated marks were significantly higher for all seven areas of assessment. Students whose placements immediately followed content teaching performed better on mid-placement APP marks in two areas of assessment (analysis and planning, and intervention) compared to students for whom there was a delay. There were no statistically significant differences in relation to delay for end of placement APP marks. Conclusion Replacing 1 week of classroom teaching with a targeted, SBL activity immediately before placement significantly improved student performance on that clinical placement. A negative impact of delay was found on mid-placement, but not the end of placement APPs. Findings of improved performance when replacing a week of content teaching with a targeted SBL activity, and poorer performance on mid-placement marks with a delay between content teaching and clinical placement, may have implications for curriculum design.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki Milne ◽  
Chanelle Louwen ◽  
Dianne Reidlinger ◽  
Jo Bishop ◽  
Megan Dalton ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Behaviour can be defined as the internally coordinated responses (actions or inactions) of whole living organisms (individuals or groups) to internal and/or external stimuli, excluding responses more easily understood as developmental changes. Unlike personality traits, that are thought to be biologically consistent, behaviour, through the application of cognition and reasoning is open to change across time and circumstance, although most humans will display preferred ways of behaving. The objective of this study was to: i) identify the behaviour styles of physiotherapy students and investigate if there is a relationship (predictive or otherwise) between students’ unique behaviour patterns and their clinical placement grades and; ii) examine if this relationship differs when student’s in a Master’s level program as well as student’s in a Bachelor’s level program are explored separately. Methods This cross-sectional study with 132 (F = 78, M = 54) physiotherapy students was conducted across two Australian university settings. Measures included Everything DiSC Workplace profile, Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP). Results Physiotherapy students (n = 133) profiled the following ways: Dominance (D) style n = 20 (15%), Influence (i) style n = 33 (25%), Steadiness (S) style n = 36 (27%) and Conscientiousness (C) n = 44 (33%). Students with the individual DiSC styles of i and Conscientiousness / Steadiness (CS) were in the lowest APP quartile for clinical grades and the D style was in the highest quartile. Binary logistic regressions revealed students with an i DiSC style had 3.96 times higher odds, and students with a CS DiSC style had 4.34 times higher odds, of failing a clinical placement. When explored independently, the same trend remained for Master’s level students. Bachelor’s level students with DiSC styles of S and C had failed placements, however these styles were not significantly associated with failure (DiSC S Style: Exp(B) 1.667, p = 0.713 (CI: 0.109 to 25.433), DiSC C Style: Exp(B) 11.00, p = 0.097 (CI: 0.646 to 187.166)). Conclusion Physiotherapy students with DiSC styles i and CS appear to be more likely to fail physiotherapy clinical placements. Further research with larger undergraduate samples is required to establish if relations differ for undergraduate versus postgraduate students.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e034945
Author(s):  
Christine Ossenberg ◽  
Marion Mitchell ◽  
Amanda Henderson

IntroductionCurrent perspectives present feedback as a dynamic, dialogic process. It is widely accepted that feedback can have an impact on workplace performance, however, how dialogic feedback is enacted with the learner in authentic healthcare settings is less apparent. This paper seeks to describe the design and development of an implementation study to promote the learner voice in the feedback process and improve feedback encounters between learners and learning partners in healthcare settings.Methods and analysisA quasi-experimental study design will be used to evaluate whether implementation of a work-based intervention to improve feedback impacts student performance during clinical placements in healthcare settings. Student performance will be measured at three time points: baseline (pre), mid-placement (post-test 1) and end-placement (post-test 2) in keeping with standard assessment processes of the participating university. The intervention is underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory and involves a layered design that targets learners and learning partners using best-practice education strategies. Data regarding participants’ engagement with feedback during clinical placements and participants’ level of adoption of the intervention will be collected at the completion of the clinical placement period.Ethics and disseminationThis study has ethics approval from both Griffith University and Metro South Health Human Research and Ethics committees. Dissemination of results will be local, national and international through forums, seminars, conferences and publications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Hough ◽  
Daniel Levan ◽  
Michael Steele ◽  
Kristine Kelly ◽  
Megan Dalton

Abstract Background The Australian Physiotherapy Council mandates that physiotherapy clinical education be sufficient to produce graduates who are competent to practice across the lifespan. Due to a lack of opportunities for paediatric clinical placements, there is a risk of graduates not having the opportunity to develop competency in paediatric physiotherapy. To address this risk, simulation-based education (SBE) has been proposed as an educational strategy to address the placement shortfall. Despite encouraging evidence for its use in physiotherapy education, there is limited evidence supporting its use specifically in paediatric populations. The aims of this research were to investigate the effect of SBE on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric clients, and to determine student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy. Methods Three interactive SBE sessions were run during the undergraduate paediatric physiotherapy unit at the campus of one Australian university. Self-efficacy was surveyed before and after each session, to determine confidence in clinical skills, clinical decision-making, treatment preparation and planning, communication skills; evaluating and modifying interventions, and interprofessional practice. Student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy was surveyed after the final SBE session. Results For the 164 participants included in this study, self-efficacy survey response rate varied from 77 to 96% for each session. Significant increases in mean student self-efficacy were recorded for all questions (p <  0.001). A total of 139 (85%) responded to the learning reactionnaire with 78.6% indicating they were very satisfied with SBE as a learning strategy. Written comments from 41 participants identified ‘experience’ as the primary theme. Conclusion SBE had a significant positive effect on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric patients. Students also perceived SBE to be a valuable learning experience. Future research is needed to investigate whether the improvement in self-efficacy achieved through SBE translates into improved student performance during workplace-based clinical placements.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Hough ◽  
Daniel Levan ◽  
Michael Steele ◽  
Kristine Kelly ◽  
Megan Dalton

Abstract The Australian Physiotherapy Council mandates that physiotherapy clinical education be sufficient to produce graduates who are competent to practice across the lifespan. Due to a lack of opportunities for paediatric clinical placements, there is a risk of graduates not having the opportunity to develop competency in paediatric physiotherapy. To address this risk, simulation-based education (SBE) has been proposed as an additional educational strategy, and despite encouraging evidence for its use in physiotherapy education, there is limited evidence supporting its use specifically in paediatric populations. The aims of this research were to investigate the effect of SBE on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric clients, and to determine student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy. Three interactive SBE sessions were run during the undergraduate paediatric physiotherapy unit at the campus of one Australian university. Self-efficacy was surveyed before and after each session, to determine confidence in clinical skills, clinical decision-making, treatment preparation and planning, communication skills; evaluating and modifying interventions, and interprofessional practice. Student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy was surveyed after the final SBE session. For the 164 participants included in this study, self-efficacy survey response rate varied from 77-96% for each session. Significant increases in mean student self-efficacy were recorded for all questions (p<0.001). A total of 139 (85%) responded to the reactionnaire with 78.6% indicating they were very satisfied with SBE as a learning strategy. Written comments from 41 participants identified ‘experience’ as the primary theme. Conclusion: SBE had a significant positive effect on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric clients. Students also perceived SBE to be a valuable learning experience. Future research is needed to investigate whether SBE improves student performance and how SBE compares to standard educational methods.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Hough ◽  
Daniel Levan ◽  
Michael Steele ◽  
Kristine Kelly ◽  
Megan Dalton

Abstract Physiotherapy students have limited opportunities to develop competency in paediatric physiotherapy due to the lack of paediatric clinical placements. To address this risk, simulation-based education (SBE) has been proposed as an educational strategy to address the placement shortfall. Despite encouraging evidence for its use in physiotherapy education, there is limited evidence supporting its use specifically in paediatric populations. The aims of this research were to investigate the effect of SBE on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric clients, and to determine student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy. Three interactive SBE sessions were run during the undergraduate paediatric physiotherapy unit at the campus of one Australian university. Self-efficacy was surveyed before and after each session, to determine confidence in clinical skills, clinical decision-making, treatment preparation and planning, communication skills; evaluating and modifying interventions, and interprofessional practice. Student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy was surveyed after the final SBE session. For the 164 participants included in this study, self-efficacy survey response rate varied from 77-96% for each session. Significant increases in mean student self-efficacy were recorded for all questions (p<0.001). A total of 139 (85%) responded to the learning reactionnaire with 78.6% indicating they were very satisfied with SBE as a learning strategy. Written comments from 41 participants identified ‘experience’ as the primary theme. Conclusion: SBE had a significant positive effect on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric patients. Students also perceived SBE to be a valuable learning experience. Future research is needed to investigate whether the improvement in self-efficacy achieved through SBE translates into improved student performance during workplace-based clinical placements.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Hough ◽  
Daniel Levan ◽  
Michael Steele ◽  
Kristine Kelly ◽  
Megan Dalton

Abstract Background The Australian Physiotherapy Council mandates that physiotherapy clinical education be sufficient to produce graduates who are competent to practice across the lifespan. Due to a lack of opportunities for paediatric clinical placements, there is a risk of graduates not having the opportunity to develop competency in paediatric physiotherapy. To address this risk, simulation-based education (SBE) has been proposed as an educational strategy to address the placement shortfall. Despite encouraging evidence for its use in physiotherapy education, there is limited evidence supporting its use specifically in paediatric populations. The aims of this research were to investigate the effect of SBE on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric clients, and to determine student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy.Methods Three interactive SBE sessions were run during the undergraduate paediatric physiotherapy unit at the campus of one Australian university. Self-efficacy was surveyed before and after each session, to determine confidence in clinical skills, clinical decision-making, treatment preparation and planning, communication skills; evaluating and modifying interventions, and interprofessional practice. Student satisfaction with SBE as a learning strategy was surveyed after the final SBE session.Results For the 164 participants included in this study, self-efficacy survey response rate varied from 77-96% for each session. Significant increases in mean student self-efficacy were recorded for all questions (p<0.001). A total of 139 (85%) responded to the learning reactionnaire with 78.6% indicating they were very satisfied with SBE as a learning strategy. Written comments from 41 participants identified ‘experience’ as the primary theme.Conclusion SBE had a significant positive effect on student self-efficacy in the physiotherapy assessment and management of paediatric patients. Students also perceived SBE to be a valuable learning experience. Future research is needed to investigate whether the improvement in self-efficacy achieved through SBE translates into improved student performance during workplace-based clinical placements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document