Comparison of Phosphorus Adsorption Capacity of Sludge Generated During the Total Phosphorus Removal Process in the Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
ung-In Suh ◽  
Dae-Won Kwon
2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1920-1923
Author(s):  
Cristian Muntenita ◽  
Carmelia Mariana Dragomir Balanica ◽  
Aurel Gabriel Simionescu ◽  
Silvius Stanciu ◽  
Camelia Lacramioara Popa

This article investigates the efficiency of phosphorus removal in the municipal wastewater treatment plants in five counties of Romania from 2013 to 2017. This study focused on evaluation of the performance of phosphorus elimination using biological methods in order to respect the admissible effluent discharge limits. The yearly average of inflow total phosphorus varies from 3.64 mg/L to 4.22 mg/L comparing with 1.02 mg/ L and 1.59 mg/L the average of outflow. Chemical and biological methods are utilized to remove phosphorus. The efficiency of the numerous process available for the phosphorus removal is quite inadequate by comparing the effluent degree of purification and the removal cost.


2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Väänänen ◽  
M. Cimbritz ◽  
J. la Cour Jansen

Primary and chemically enhanced primary wastewater treatment with microsieving (disc or drum filtration) was studied at the large pilot scale at seven municipal wastewater treatment plants in Europe. Without chemical dosing, the reduction of suspended solids (SS) was (on average) 50% (20–65%). By introducing chemically enhanced primary treatment and dosing with cationic polymer only, SS removal could be controlled and increased to >80%. A maximum SS removal of >90% was achieved with a chemical dosing of >0.007 mg polymer/mg influent SS and 20 mg Al3+/L or 30 mg Fe3+/L. When comparing sieve pore sizes of 30–40 μm with 100 μm, the effluent SS was comparable, indicating that the larger sieve pore size could be used due to the higher loading capacity for the solids. Phosphorus removal was adjusted with the coagulant dose, and a removal of 95–97% was achieved. Moreover, microsieving offers favourable conditions for automated dosing control due to the low retention time in the filter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document