Сlinical and epidemiological profiles and tactics of patient’s management with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
D. V. Trishkin ◽  
K. S. Shulenin ◽  
D. V. Cherkashin ◽  
G. G. Kutelev ◽  
S. V. Efimov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Artery Disease

A comparative analysis of clinical and epidemiological data and results of treatment of 7 patients suffering from myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (main group) and 54 patients with their lesions (control group) aged 45,69,3 and 62,714,2 years, respectively. Both groups were dominated by men (85,7% and 72,2%, respectively). In the main group, dyslipidemia and hypertension were less common (14,3 and 28,6%, respectively) than in the control group (61,1 and 72,2%, respectively). At the same time, the former had a more burdened history of early cardiovascular events in close relatives in 28,6% of cases, and the latter-only in 5,6% of cases. Surgical tactics and features of double antiplatelet therapy in myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease did not differ from the standard approach. In both groups, active surgical tactics prevailed, consisting in performing percutaneous coronary intervention and installing a coronary stent in the infarct-related artery (85,7 and 83,3%, respectively). The choice of dual antiplatelet therapy in the main group did not differ from the control group and was characterized by a significantly higher frequency of clopidogrel administration (71,4 and 72,2%, respectively). When comparing the left ventricular ejection fraction before and after percutaneous coronary intervention, it turned out that in patients of the main group, in contrast to the control group, the value of the left ventricular ejection fraction did not change significantly (52,56,4 and 51,39,5, respectively). The etiology and pathogenesis of myocardial damage in patients suffering from myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease is characterized by significant heterogeneity, which requires additional examinations and differential diagnostics to identify the underlying causes of this condition.

scholarly journals Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The Labyrinth of Investigations. Case Report and Review of the Literature

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1181
Author(s):  
Paul Simion ◽  
Bogdan Artene ◽  
Ionut Achiței ◽  
Iulian Theodor Matei ◽  
Antoniu Octavian Petriș ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Infarctions ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Artery Disease

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) accounts for approximately 5–15% of acute myocardial infarctions (MI). This infarction type raises a series of questions about the underlying mechanism of myocardial damage, the diagnostic pathway, optimal therapy, and the outcomes of these patients when compared to MI associated with obstructive coronary artery disease. We present the case of a 60-year-old patient with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities who is admitted in an emergency setting. The patient is known with a conservatively treated inferior myocardial infarction which occurred 3 months prior, with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Emergency coronary angiography revealed normal epicardial coronary arteries, which led to further investigations of the underlying cause. Considering the absence of epicardial and microvascular spasm, CMR (cardiac magnetic resonance) confirmation of two transmural myocardial infarctions in the territories tributary to coronary arteries, and a high index of myocardial resistance in culprit arteries, we concluded the diagnosis of MINOCA due to the microvascular endothelial dysfunction. Although the concept of MINOCA was devised almost a decade ago, and these patients are an important part of MI presentations, it still represents a diagnostic challenge with multiple explorations required to establish the precise etiology.

P879Discharge medication and 1-year outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a nationwide registry-based study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P M Azevedo ◽  
T Mota ◽  
J Bispo ◽  
J Guedes ◽  
D Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurs in 5% to 10% of all patients with myocardial infarction. Although these patients are often treated as if they had obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD), optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention in MINOCA patients have not been prospectively studied. We hypothesize that the same treatment strategy as for OCAD is unlikely to be beneficial in MINOCA patients due to their heterogeneous nature. Purpose Characterize and assess the impact of discharge medication on 1-year mortality or hospitalization in patients with MINOCA. Methods Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recorded in the Portuguese Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (ProACS) between 2010 and 1017. All patients who underwent coronary angiography and had no obstructive lesions (defined as <50% diameter stenosis) were included for analysis (n=829, 4.8% of a total of 17213). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and medication at discharge were analyzed. The association between treatment and outcome was estimated by comparing treated and untreated groups using Cox proportional hazard models. The exposures considered were treatment at discharge with statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs), beta-blockers (BB), aspirin (ASA) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The outcomes evaluated were 1-year all-cause mortality and 1-year hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) Results 829 patients (54% male, mean age 65±13 years) were included. 67% had hypertension, 20% diabetes mellitus, 45% hyperlipidemia, 66% were overweight, 23% were current smokers, 5.5% had history of heart failure, 4.3% valvular heart disease, 8% cerebrovascular disease and 4.7% chronic kidney disease. The admission diagnosis was most frequently non-ST elevation MI (79.3%) and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (%) was 56±12. 4 patients died during hospitalization (0.5%). At discharge, aspirin was prescribed in 85.7% patients, clopidogrel in 54.8%, ticagrelor in 7.5%, DAPT in 57.7%, ACEi/ARB in 79.2%, beta-blocker in 69% and statins in 90.2%. 1-year mortality and 1-year CVD hospitalization was 3.8% and 9%, respectively. After adjusting for covariates in Cox regression analysis, we found no association between any medication at discharge and 1-year outcomes. Conclusion A high proportion of patients are prescribed antiplatelet therapy, including DAPT. We found no significant 1-year beneficial effect of treatment with statins, ACEi/ARBs, BB, aspirin or DAPT in MINOCA. This may be partially explained by the highly heterogenous population and relative short-term follow-up. In MINOCA patients, treatment should be individualized after an exhaustive diagnostic workup to identify the underlying cause (e.g. CAD with spontaneous autolysis of an intracoronary thrombus, myocarditis or takotsubo syndrome).

Elderly woman presenting with multivessel coronary artery disease and Takotsubo syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e242367
Author(s):  
Hari Vivekanantham ◽  
Martin Scoglio ◽  
Philipp Suter ◽  
Stephane Cook ◽  
Yann Roux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Takotsubo Syndrome ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Left Anterior Descending Artery ◽  
Artery Disease

Takotsubo syndrome is an acute and often reversible condition, with initial presentation mimicking acute coronary syndrome. Typically, patients present with left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities, without a corresponding coronary artery obstruction on angiography. Coexistence of a coronary artery disease is possible and may render the distinction between the two entities particularly challenging. We report the case of a 94-year-old woman with chest pain after an emotional upset and acute myocardial injury. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with apical ballooning. Coronary angiogram showed significant stenosis of the distal left main coronary artery and of the mid-left anterior descending artery, as well as a 30%–50% stenosis of the mid-distal right coronary artery. Revascularisation was deferred and antiplatelet as well as heart failure therapy begun. A repeat TTE 6 days later revealed a quasi-normalised LVEF. Ultimately, percutaneous coronary revascularisation of the left main and left anterior descending artery was performed, with favourable outcome at 6-month follow-up.

scholarly journals A STEMI gone viral

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
William Wung ◽  
Alison G Chang ◽  
Thomas WR Smith
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Electrical Storm ◽  
Ecg Changes ◽  
Artery Disease

A 65-year-old male with a history of coronary artery disease and ankylosing spondylitis presented with focal ECG changes and elevated cardiac biomarkers suggestive of an acute lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Emergent coronary angiography surprisingly showed non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Further workup including a cardiac MRI, viral serologies, and an endomyocardial biopsy was consistent with focal Coxsackie viral myocarditis. The patient subsequently developed recurrent, pulseless ventricular tachycardia requiring multiple rounds of ACLS, and his left ventricular ejection fraction acutely dropped from 55% to 20%. An emergent intra-aortic balloon pump was placed, and an intravenous lidocaine infusion and high-dose corticosteroids were started for the patient’s electrical storm and myocarditis, respectively. The patient was eventually discharged in stable condition with an implantable cardiac defibrillator. No further episodes of ventricular tachycardia were noted at six-month follow-up. In patients with acute ECG changes, elevated cardiac biomarkers, and no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease, myocarditis should be considered as a leading diagnosis given the potentially life-threatening sequelae as seen in our patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document