scholarly journals The role of primary care physicians in diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic viral hepatites B, C and D

2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-445
Author(s):  
D Sh Enaleeva ◽  
V Kh Fazylov

By 01.01.2013 in the Republic of Tatarstan there were 23 970 Hepatitis B Surface Antigen carriers and 4546 patients with active Hepatitis B out of 28 516 registered patients who were infected with Hepatitis B. Our experience shows that not only inactive chronic Hepatitis B Surface Antigen carriers, but also patients with different clinical forms of Hepatitis B might be estimated as Hepatitis B Surface Antigen carriers. The feature of chronic viral hepatitides is a discrepancy between the scarce clinical picture and presence (in 15-30% of cases) of active inflammation in liver tissue. Since 2009, patients with positive ELISA test for antibodies to Hepatitis C virus are no longer registered in the national registry of infective diseases of Russian Federation. In the Republic of Tatarstan, such patients with antibodies to Hepatitis C virus were still registered up to 2012 (50 266 patients were registered by 01.01.2012). According to our own data, Hepatitis C viral RNA was found at polymerase chain reaction to Hepatitis C virus in 61% of cases out of 957 patients tested. According to our own data, when using the combined treatment (interferon alpha and ribavirin), lasting virologic response was obtained in 65.7% cases of type 1 genotype of Hepatitis C and almost in 100% of cases of other genotypes out of 163 cases of chronic Hepatitis C, which corresponds to worldwide standards. By 01.01.2013, 295 patients with liver cirrhosis as the result of chronic Hepatitis C were followed up at the consultative and diagnostic center of Republican Clinical Hospital of Infective Diseases with the upward trend. The retrospective analysis of 130 case histories of patients with liver cirrhosis revealed that Hepatitis C was firstly diagnosed at the stage of established liver cirrhosis in 57.7% of cases. Timely diagnosis and periodic medical examination in cases of chronic Hepatitis C allows to implement the individual, personalized approach in such patients and to choose the adequate treatment and follow-up.

Hepatology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 2135-2142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Lung Yu ◽  
Chuan-Mo Lee ◽  
Chi-Ling Chen ◽  
Wan-Long Chuang ◽  
Sheng-Nan Lu ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara González ◽  
Sonia Navas ◽  
Antonio Madejón ◽  
Javier Bartolomé ◽  
Inmaculada Castillo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Sobhy ◽  
Mohammed Fakhry M. ◽  
Haitham A Azeem ◽  
Ahmed M Ashmawy ◽  
Hamed Omar Khalifa

Several studies were performed to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis by non-invasive markers. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of both biglycan (BGN) and osteopontin (OPN) as non-invasive markers of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC). This study was performed on 100 patients with CHB virus, 100 patients with CHC virus and 100 normal controls. All participants were subjected to the following laboratory tests: hemoglobin, platelet, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, international normalized ratio, HBs Ag, hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody, hepatitis B virus DNA, HCV RNA, liver biopsy, BGN and OPN. We found that BGN level was significantly increased in the CHB group compared with the controls (p<0.001), but the level was not different between the CHC group and the controls (p<0.96). OPN was increased in both the CHB and CHC groups compared with the controls (p<0.001). Positive correlation was found between fibrosis stages and BGN level of the CHB group (r=0.64; p<0.001) and between fibrosis stages and OPN level of the CHB (r=0.63; p<0.001) and CHC (r=0.59; p<0.03) groups. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of BGN were 1.0, 100% and 100% in predicting fibrosis in patients with CHB, and 0.50, 26% and 78% in predicting fibrosis in patients with CHC. OPN had an AUC of 0.997, sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100% in predicting fibrosis in patients with CHB, and 0.974, 96.5% and 100% in predicting fibrosis in patients with CHC. In conclusion, BGN and OPN could be considered non-invasive markers for liver fibrosis assessment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 538-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Kobayashi ◽  
Tetsuya Hosaka ◽  
Fumitaka Suzuki ◽  
Norio Akuta ◽  
Hitomi Sezaki ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Alves de Mattos ◽  
Eliana Buksztejn Gomes ◽  
Cristiane Valle Tovo ◽  
Cláudio Osmar Pereira Alexandre ◽  
José Oscar dos Reis Remião

BACKGROUND: Considering the immunosuppression of patients with chronic liver disease, their response to vaccination is discussed in literature. AIMS: To evaluate the response of hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. METHODS: This is a prospective study in which 85 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection (46.8 ± 9.4 years, 44.7% males) and 46 healthy adults (36.7 ± 11.1 years; 39.1% males) were evaluated. Confirmation of hepatitis C virus was obtained by the technique of polymerase chain reaction. Viral load was determined by the branched DNA method in 74 patients, and genotype was determined by sequencing in 73 patients. All patients and healthy adults received three doses of Engerix B® vaccine IM (at 0, 30 and 180 days). Serological responses to the vaccine were divided into three categories: seroprotection, when anti-HBs was >100 mUI/mL; seroconversion, when anti-HBs was 10-99 mUI/mL, and non-reagent, when anti-HBs was <10 mUI/mL. RESULTS: The response of hepatitis B vaccine as determined 1 month following dose 3 was seroprotection in 37.7%, seroconversion in 17.6% and non-reagent in 44.7% among patients and 84.8%, 13.0%, 2.2%, respectively in healthy adults. The number of non-reagent responses was significantly higher among those patients with chronic liver disease. Sixty-five patients with chronic hepatitis were compared to 20 compensated cirrhotic patients in concern to the response to vaccine, but no difference was found. The response to vaccine in patients with genotypes 2 or 3 (n = 40) was better than in those with genotype 1 (n = 33). Response was not related to serum HCV-RNA concentration. CONCLUSION: The number of non-responders was higher in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, irrespective of histological status and viral load. It is suggested that such patients should receive a double dose of vaccine, particularly the ones with genotype 1.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tulika Chandra ◽  
S. Nishat Fatima Rizvi ◽  
Devisha Agarwal

Transfusion transmitted infections are major problem associated with blood transfusion. Accurate estimates of risk of TTIs are essential for monitoring the safety of blood supply and evaluating the efficacy of currently employed screening procedures. The present study was carried out to assess the percentage of voluntary donors and replacement donors and to find out prevalence and changing trends of various TTIs blood donors in recent years. A study was carried out on blood units of voluntary and replacement donors which were collected from January 2008 to December 2012. On screening of 180,371 replacement units, seropositivity of transfusion transmitted disease in replacement donors was 0.15% in HIV, 1.67% in hepatitis B surface antigen, 0.49% in hepatitis C virus, 0.01% in VDRL, and 0.009% in malaria. Of 11,977 voluntary units, seropositivity of transfusion transmitted disease in voluntary donors was 0.08% in HIV, 0.24% in hepatitis B surface antigen, 0.001% in hepatitis C virus, 0.008% in VDRL (sexually transmitted disease), and 0.01% in malaria. From results it has been concluded that prevalence of transfusion transmitted infection (HIV, HBV, HCV, VDRL, and malaria) was more in replacement donors in comparison to voluntary donors. Extensive donor selection and screening procedures will help in improving the blood safety.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e0237398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf A. Ashhab ◽  
Holly Rodin ◽  
Marilia Campos ◽  
Ahmad Abu-Sulb ◽  
Jane A. Hall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document