Modeling Seismic Network Detection Thresholds Using Production Picking Algorithms

Author(s):  
David C. Wilson ◽  
Emily Wolin ◽  
William L. Yeck ◽  
Robert E. Anthony ◽  
Adam T. Ringler

Abstract Estimating the detection threshold of a seismic network (the minimum magnitude earthquake that can be reliably located) is a critical part of network design and can drive network maintenance efforts. The ability of a station to detect an earthquake is often estimated by assuming the spectral amplitude for an earthquake of a given size, assuming an attenuation relationship, and comparing the predicted amplitude with the average station background noise level. This approach has significant uncertainty because of unknown regional attenuation and complications in computing small event power spectra, and it fails to account for the specific capabilities of the automatic seismic phase picker used in monitoring. We develop a data-driven approach to determine network detection thresholds using a multiband phase picking algorithm that is currently in use at the U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center. We apply this picking algorithm to cataloged earthquakes to determine an empirical relationship of the observability of earthquakes as a function of magnitude and distance. Using this relationship, we produce maps of detection threshold using station spatial configuration and station noise levels. We show that quiet, well-sited stations significantly increase the detection capabilities of a network compared with a network composed of many noisy stations. Because our method is data driven, it has two distinct advantages: (1) it is less dependent on theoretical assumptions of source spectra and models of regional attenuation, and (2) it can easily be applied to any seismic network. This tool allows for an objective approach to the management of stations in regional seismic networks.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Theresia Apoloner ◽  
Helmut Hausmann ◽  
Nikolaus Horn ◽  

<p><span><span>Seismic networks are expanding and changing continuously: station instrumentation breaks and improves, new stations are set up permanently and tempora</span></span><span><span>ri</span></span><span><span>ly for projects, or get available online from seismological services. For routine processing, it is important to know </span></span><span><span>if and </span></span><span><span>whe</span></span><span><span>re</span></span><span><span> adding an existing station to processing or building or improving a station will add the most value to the detection an location capabilities.</span></span></p><p><span><span>Therefore, in this study we calculate </span></span><span><span>seismic network detection</span></span><span><span>thresholds for Austria using </span></span><span><span>data available</span></span><span><span> to us </span></span><span><span>from different sources: F</span></span><span><span>rom the </span></span><span><span>Seismic Network of Austria (OE)</span></span><span><span>, which consists of </span></span><span><span>unevenly distributed </span></span><span><span>high quality low noise broadband and strong-motion stations, with station spacing up to 100 km. </span></span><span><span>Cross-border </span></span><span><span>from neighboring countries, where each of them operates at least one seismic network with very different station quality and coverage. </span></span><span><span>As well as f</span></span><span><span>rom temporary </span></span><span><span>regional scientific projects (i.a. AlpArray (Z3), the SWATH (ZS)) and local infrastructure monitoring</span></span><span><span> </span></span><span><span>(GeoTief EXPLORE 3D).</span></span></p><p><span><span>Additionally to comparing different methods </span></span><span><span>(SN-CAST by Möllhoff et al. 2019, Net-Sim by Niko Horn, GT5-criterium) </span></span><span><span>with each other, </span></span><span><span>w</span></span><span><span>e also analyze how strong-motion stations, recently added due to </span></span><span><span>the</span></span><span><span> interregio project ARMONIA, </span></span><span><span>improve</span></span><span><span> the detection capabilities.</span></span></p>


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Andrew Doyle ◽  
Paule-Joanne Toussaint ◽  
Alan C. Evans

AbstractWe introduce a novel method that employs a parametric model of human electroen-cephalographic (EEG) brain signal power spectra to evaluate cognitive science experiments and test scientific hypotheses. We develop the Neural Power Amplifier (NPA), a data-driven approach to EEG pre-processing that can replace current filtering strategies with a principled method based on combining filters with log-arithmic and Gaussian magnitude responses. Presenting the first time domain evidence to validate an increasingly popular model for neural power spectra [1], we show that filtering out the 1/f background signal and selecting peaks improves a time-domain decoding experiment for visual stimulus of human faces versus random noise.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ghil ◽  
Mickael D. Chekroun ◽  
Dmitri Kondrashov ◽  
Michael K. Tippett ◽  
Andrew Robertson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ernest Pusateri ◽  
Bharat Ram Ambati ◽  
Elizabeth Brooks ◽  
Ondrej Platek ◽  
Donald McAllaster ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jhonatan Camacho Navarro ◽  
Magda Ruiz ◽  
Rodolfo Villamizar ◽  
Luis Mujica ◽  
Jabid Quiroga

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document