scholarly journals Cayman Islands

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cayman Islands

Relationship Between Cruise-ship Tourism And Stay-over Tourism: A Case Study of the Shift In the Cayman Islands' Tourism Strategy

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannarong Shamsub ◽  
William Albrecht ◽  
Russell Dawkins
Keyword(s):  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Cruise Ship

Diaporthe citri. [Distribution map].

1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Puerto Rico ◽  
Central America ◽  
Papua New Guinea ◽  
West Indies ◽  
Ivory Coast ◽  
Uttar Pradesh ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Entre Rios ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Diaporthe citri Wolf. Hosts: Citrus spp. Information is given on the geographical distribution in AFRICA, Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rhodesia, Senegal, South Africa, Tunisia, Zambia, ASIA, Cambodia, China (Szechuan), India (Uttar Pradesh), Indonesia (Java), Iraq, Israel, Japan, Korea, Pakistan, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, USSR (Republic of Georgia), AUSTRALASIA & OCEANIA, Australia, Cook Islands, Fiji, Hawaii, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Samoa (Am.), EUROPE, Azores, Cyprus, Greece (Crete), Italy (incl. Sicily), Portugal, Spain, NORTH AMERICA, Mexico, USA, CENTRAL AMERICA & WEST INDIES, Barbados, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, Panama, Puerto Rico, St. Vincent, Trinidad, SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina (Tucuman, Corrientes, Entre Rios), Brazil (Sao Paulo, Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, Rio de Janeiro, Espirito Santo), Chile, Guyana, Paraguay, Surinam, Uruguay, Venezuela.

Verticillium theobromae. [Distribution map].

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Puerto Rico ◽  
Central America ◽  
Sierra Leone ◽  
West Indies ◽  
New South ◽  
Cape Verde ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
South Wales ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Verticillium theobromae (Turc.) Mason & Hughes. Hosts: on Banana (Musa). Information is given on the geographical distribution in AFRICA, Angola, Cameroon, Canary Islands, Cape Verde Islands, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Libya, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rhodesia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, ASIA, India (MP), Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Thailand, Yemen, AUSTRALASIA & OCEANIA, Australia (Queensland, New South Wales), Fiji, EUROPE, Azores, Cyprus, Greece (Crete), Italy, NORTH AMERICA, Bermuda, CENTRAL AMERICA & WEST INDIES, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Dominica, French, Antilles, Grenada, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, Puerto Rico, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Trinidad, SOUTH AMERICA, Brazil (San Paulo, Minas Gerais, Espirito Santo), Bolivia, Colombia, Guyana, Peru, Venezuela.

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. [Distribution map].

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Fusarium Oxysporum ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Virgin Islands ◽  
Peninsular Malaysia ◽  
Marshall Islands ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Mariana Islands ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Northern Mariana Islands ◽  
Brunei Darussalam

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense (E.F. Sm.) Snyder & Hansen. Sordariomycetes: Hypocreales: Nectriaceae. Hosts: Musa spp. and Heliconia spp. Information is given on the geographical distribution in Europe (Portugal, Madeira, Spain, Canary Islands), Asia (Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, China, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Henan, Hunan, Yunnan, India, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Indonesia, Irian Jaya, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Sumatra, Jordan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Peninsular Malaysia, Sarawak, Myanmar, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam), Africa (Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Comoros, Congo, Congo Democratic Republic, Cote d'Ivoire, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo and Uganda), North America (Mexico, USA, Florida and Hawaii), Central America and Caribbean (Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique, Nicaragua, Panama, Puerto Rico, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago and United States Virgin Islands), South America (Brazil, Alagoas, Amazonas, Bahia, Espirito Santo, Minas Gerais, Para, Parana, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo, Tocantins, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezulea) and Oceania (Australia, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, Western Australia, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Guam, Marshall Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, Papua New Guinea and Tonga).

Aleurocanthus woglumi. [Distribution map].

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Andhra Pradesh ◽  
Uttar Pradesh ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Irian Jaya ◽  
Aleurocanthus Woglumi ◽  
New Distribution ◽  
Distribution In Europe

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Aleurocanthus woglumi Ashby. Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae (Citrus blackfly). Attacks Citrus, coffee, mango, papaya, pomegranate. Information is given on the geographical distribution in Europe, Azores, Africa, Kenya, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Asia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burma, Cambodia, China, Guangdong, India, Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Delhi, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Indonesia, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Sumatra, Iran, Laos, Malaysia, Sabah, Sarawak, West Malaysia, Maldives, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Sikkim, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Yemen Republic, Korea, Australasia and Pacific Ocean Islands, Irian Jaya, Papua New Guinea, Bougainville, Hawaii, North America, Florida, Texas, Central America, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Puerto Rico, South America, Colombia, Ecuador, Surinam, Peru, Venezuela.

Spodoptera frugiperda. [Distribution map].

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Spodoptera Frugiperda ◽  
Prince Edward Island ◽  
Rio Grande ◽  
Virgin Islands ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Mato Grosso

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith). Lepidoptera: Noctuidae. Hosts: polyphagous but especially Poaceae. Information is given on the geographical distribution in Africa (Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Congo Democratic Republic, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe), North America (Canada, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Mexico, USA, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming), Central America & Caribbean (Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Nicaragua, Panama, Puerto Rico, St Kitts-Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, United States Virgin Islands), South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Amapa, Amazonas, Bahia, Ceara, Espirito Santo, Goias, Maranhao, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, Para, Paraiba, Parana, Pernambuco, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Norte, Rio Grande do Sul, Roraima, Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo, Tocantins, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, Venezuela).

Does holding offshore jurisdictions to higher AML standards really assist in preventing money laundering?

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew James Perkins
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Task Forces ◽  
Financial Crimes ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Combat Money Laundering

Purpose This paper aims to contend that when tackling financial crimes such as money laundering and terrorist financing, international regulators are seeking to hold offshore jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands to higher standards and that this detracts from the pursuit of detecting and prosecuting money launders. Design/methodology/approach This paper will deal with the following perceived issues: firstly, to offshore jurisdictions as a concept; secondly, to outline the efforts made by the Cayman Islands to combat money laundering and to rate these changes against Financial Action Task Forces’ (FATAF’s) technical criteria; thirdly, to demonstrate that the Cayman Islands is among some of the world’s top jurisdictions for compliance with FATAF’s standards; and finally, to examine whether greylisting was necessary and to comment upon whether efforts by international regulators to hold offshore jurisdictions to higher standards detracts from the actual prosecution of money laundering within the jurisdiction. Findings Greylisting the Cayman Islands in these authors’ view was something that should have never happened; the Cayman Islands is being held to standards far beyond what is expected in an onshore jurisdiction. There is a need for harmonisation in respect of international anti money laundering rules and regulations to shift the tone to prosecution and investigation of offences rather than on rating jurisdictions technical compliance with procedural rules where states have a workable anti-money laundering (AML) regime. Research limitations/implications The implications of this research are to show that offshore jurisdictions are being held by FATAF and other international regulators to higher AML standards than their onshore counterparties. Practical implications The author hopes that this paper will begin the debate as to whether FATAF needs to give reasons as to why offshore jurisdictions are held to higher standards and whether it needs to begin to contemplate higher onshore standards. Originality/value This is an original piece of research evaluating the effect of FATAF's reporting on offshore jurisdictions with a case study involving primary and secondary data in relation to the Cayman Islands.

scholarly journals The role of conservation physiology in mitigating social-ecological traps in wildlife-provisioning tourism: a case study of feeding stingrays in the Cayman Islands

2020 ◽  
pp. 125-140
Author(s):  
Christina A.D. Semeniuk
Keyword(s):  
Social System ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Human Dimensions ◽  
Cayman Islands ◽  
Physiological Indicators ◽  
Social Ecological Systems ◽  
Social Ecological ◽  
The Social ◽  
Effective Selection

In feeding marine wildlife, tourists can impact animals in ways that are not immediately apparent (i.e. morbidity vs. mortality/reproductive failure). Inventorying the health status of wildlife with physiological indicators can provide crucial information on the immediate status of organisms and long-term consequences. However, because tourists are attempting to maximize their own satisfaction, encouraging the willingness to accept management regulations also requires careful consideration of the human dimensions of the system. Without such socio-ecological measures, the wildlife-tourism system may fall into a trap—a lose–lose situation where the pressure imposed by the social system (tourist expectations) has costs for the ecological system (maladaptive behaviours, health), which in turn feed back into the social system (shift in tourist typography, loss of revenue, decreased satisfaction), resulting in the demise of both systems (exhaustion). Effective selection and communication of physiological metrics of wildlife health is key to minimizing problem-causing and problem-enhancing feedbacks in social-ecological systems. This guiding principle is highlighted in the case study presented here on the socio-ecological research and management success of feeding southern stingrays (Hypanus americanus) as a marine tourism attraction at Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document