scholarly journals Treatments for Age-related Macular Degeneration

2010 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Winfried MK Amoaku ◽  

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of irreversible visual loss in the developed world. There are two types of AMD: dry and wet. The exact cause of the disease is unknown, but is thought to result from interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Smoking, hypertension and low intake and/or low levels of serum antioxidants are known risk factors for both forms. As yet there are no treatments available for the dry form of AMD. Smoking cessation and healthy lifestyles are important in the prevention of progression of AMD. Progression of early stages of AMD to advanced forms is slowed by regular intake of ocular nutritional supplements as found in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Study. Recently, there have been significant breakthroughs in the treatment of wet or neovascular AMD, including photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs, including pegaptanib, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Newer agents including aflibercept and anti-platelet-derived growth factor (anti-PDGF) compounds are under investigation. The current gold standard for treatment of wet AMD is intravitreal injections of ranibizumab. Combination therapy with PDT and anti-VEGF agents is useful especially in idiopathic polypoidal choroidopathy (IPCV) or when anti-VEGF monotherapy has failed. Rapid referral of patients with neovascular AMD is important as the visual outcome is dependent on the visual acuity at treatment. Diagnostic confirmation with retinal imaging, particularly fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherent tomography, are required before treatment commencement. The new treatments for wet AMD are repetitive, and have significant service implications. These implications occur irrespective of which anti- VEGF agent is adopted. Visual rehabilitation is still important in the management of AMD.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Zampros ◽  
Anna Praidou ◽  
Periklis Brazitikos ◽  
Panagiotis Ekonomidis ◽  
Sofia Androudi

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of severe visual loss and blindness over the age of 50 in developed countries. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is considered as a critical molecule in the pathogenesis of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), which characterizes the neovascular AMD. Anti-VEGF agents are considered the most promising way of effectively inhibition of the neovascular AMD process. VEGF is a heparin-binding glycoprotein with potent angiogenic, mitogenic and vascular permeability-enhancing activities specific for endothelial cells. Two anti-VEGF agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Pegaptanib sodium, which is an aptamer and ranibizumab, which is a monoclonal antibody fragment. Another humanized monoclonal antibody is currently off-label used, bevacizumab. This paper aims to discuss in details the effectiveness, the efficacy and safety of these three anti-VEGF agents. New anti-VEGF compounds which are recently investigated for their clinical usage (VEGF-trap, small interfering RNA) are also discussed for their promising outcomes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 48-56
Author(s):  
Atsuta Ozaki ◽  
Hisashi Matsubara ◽  
Masahiko Sugimoto ◽  
Manami Kuze ◽  
Mineo Kondo ◽  
...  

Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is essential for the treatment of macular diseases such as wet age-related macular degeneration and macular edema. Although continued treatment is needed to maintain good vision, some patients cannot continue such injections for various reasons, including specific phobias. Here, we report a case of a patient with a specific phobia of intravitreal injections who could resume treatment after undergoing combined drug and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). A 74-year-old Japanese man diagnosed with retinal angiomatous proliferation by fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography was treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. However, at 8 months after the first treatment, he became difficult to treat because of a phobia of injections. He was treated with photodynamic therapy, but his macular edema did not improve. After a psychiatric consultation, he was diagnosed with a specific phobia of intravitreal injections. Combined drug and CBT enabled him to resume receiving intravitreal injections. This case demonstrates that a specific phobia of intravitreal injections may benefit from combined drug and CBT. In this regard, some patients with high anxiety and fear of intravitreal injections should be referred to a psychiatrist at an early stage.


2016 ◽  
Vol 235 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoaki Shiba ◽  
Mao Takahashi ◽  
Izumi Yoshida ◽  
Hikari Taniguchi ◽  
Tadashi Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether multiple intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) exacerbate systemic arteriosclerosis, using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and intima-media thickness (IMT). Methods: We analyzed the data of 45 AMD patients who received intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF drugs (ranibizumab and/or aflibercept) and underwent systemic evaluations at baseline and after treatment. Reevaluation was conducted at ≥12 months from the initial treatment. Results: The total number of intravitreal injections of overall anti-VEGF drugs was significantly correlated with Δserum cystatin C. The cumulative number of aflibercept injections was identified as an independent protective factor for ΔCAVI. An increase in the cumulative number of intravitreal injections of overall anti-VEGF drugs was identified as a protective factor for Δmean IMT. Conclusion: Repeated intravitreal injections of an anti-VEGF drug for AMD may lead to morphological and functional changes in large arteries.


2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316511
Author(s):  
Michael N. Cohen ◽  
Denis O’Shaughnessy ◽  
Kate Fisher ◽  
Jennifer Cerami ◽  
Carl C Awh ◽  
...  

PurposeThe safety and efficacy of X-82, an orally administered inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor, was investigated for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in a phase II clinical trial.MethodsThis phase II, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial enrolled subjects with a prior diagnosis of exudative AMD having received at least two intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF therapy. Subjects were randomised equally into four groups that received either daily 50mg, 100mg or 200mg dosages of X-82 or a placebo tablet. At each 4-week interval visit for 52 weeks, subjects were to be assessed to determine if rescue treatment was needed with anti-VEGF therapy.Results157 patients were enrolled. Due to gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary adverse events and the fulfilment of the primary endpoint, the trial was stopped prematurely after a second interim analysis. The primary endpoint of non-inferiority of visual acuity compared with placebo was demonstrated in all groups receiving X-82 (p<0.001). There was a dose-dependent trend in the number of injections over a 52-week period, with the 50 mg (n=40), 100 mg (n=39), 200 mg (n=39) and placebo (n=39) group requiring 6.7, 6.0, 4.7 and 8.1 injections, respectively.ConclusionsX-82 oral therapy in combination with pro re nata anti-VEGF injections showed non-inferiority in visual acuity outcomes while achieving a dose-dependent decrease in the number of anti-VEGF injections compared with placebo. Given the limited tolerability and safety issues observed, X-82 does not have a sufficient benefit to risk profile in treatment of patients with AMD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Zofia Michalewska ◽  
Jerzy Nawrocki

Purpose: This article studies visual outcome and frequency of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections continued in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who had an earlier vitrectomy for postinjection endophthalmitis. Methods: A retrospective interventional study was conducted reviewing our database for patients with a diagnosis of endophthalmitis in the course of anti-VEGF injections. Endophthalmitis diagnosis was made on clinical examination of pain, rapid decrease in visual acuity (VA), conjunctival hyperemia, hypopyon, and vitritis. In all eyes, core vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics was performed. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was performed monthly before and after surgery during follow-up. Anti-VEGF injections were continued after surgery in all cases. Results: Eight eyes with postinjection endophthalmitis were included. Mean VA immediately before endophthalmitis was 20/50 Snellen with a mean of 19 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections ( P = .45). At time of endophthalmitis diagnosis, mean VA was 20/1000 (range, 20/2000-20/200). Mean time from injection to when the patient noted first symptoms was 4.3 days (range, 1-8 days). Mean time from first symptoms to surgery was 12 hours (range, 2.5-26 hours). Final mean VA at the end of follow-up (range, 12-84 months) did not statistically differ from VA at the visit immediately before endophthalmitis diagnosis ( P = .69). Mean frequency of injections after vitrectomy did not significantly differ from the presurgical course of treatment ( P =.97). Conclusions: Anti-VEGF treatment might be continued after vitrectomy for endophthalmitis and results in satisfactory anatomical and visual outcome. Surgery did not influence the frequency of anti-VEGF injections for neovascular AMD.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 230-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Matsubara ◽  
Ryohei Miyata ◽  
Maki Kobayashi ◽  
Hideyuki Tsukitome ◽  
Kengo Ikesugi ◽  
...  

Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are widely used to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Although these treatments are effective, multiple injections have recently been recommended to ensure that there is a good long-term prognosis. However, sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations have been reported to develop after multiple injections of anti-VEGF agents. We present our findings of a case of uncontrolled and persistent IOP elevation after switching from intravitreal ranibizumab injections to intravitreal aflibercept injections. A 74-year-old Japanese man without a history of glaucoma underwent 22 ranibizumab injections for nAMD and suddenly developed an elevated IOP after the 22nd injection. Although the subsequent medical treatment led to normalization of his IOP, the subretinal fluid under the central fovea remained even after the 25th injection of ranibizumab. Thus, ranibizumab treatment was switched to bimonthly intravitreal aflibercept injections in conjunction with glaucoma medications. His IOP recovered to within the normal range; however, after the 11th aflibercept injection, there was a sudden elevation of his IOP in spite of the continued glaucoma medications. Due to this sustained IOP elevation, his aflibercept injections were suspended for 16 weeks. Because his IOP could not be normalized by a full glaucoma medication regimen, the patient underwent trabeculotomy, which resulted in a lowering of the IOP to normal levels. We conclude that patients who receive serial intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents need to be closely monitored because severe and sustained ocular hypertension can develop.


Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of permanent visual loss in persons over 65 years of age in developed countries. Currently, intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors are the mainstay of the treatment for patients with wet AMD. Despite significant improvements in visual acuity since the beginning of these therapies, challenges in the treatment of wet AMD are still present. Therefore, there are ongoing researches such as sustained-release anti-VEGF therapy, novel generation anti-VEGF agents, viral vectors to modify genetic transcription, and combination therapies. In this review, it is aimed to discuss these emerging therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document