Anti-PlGF (placental growth factor) as a safer alternative for anti-VEGF in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD)?

2008 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
S VAN DE VEIRE ◽  
S VINORES ◽  
A PERIC ◽  
M MAZZONE ◽  
L MOONS ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316511
Author(s):  
Michael N. Cohen ◽  
Denis O’Shaughnessy ◽  
Kate Fisher ◽  
Jennifer Cerami ◽  
Carl C Awh ◽  
...  

PurposeThe safety and efficacy of X-82, an orally administered inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor, was investigated for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in a phase II clinical trial.MethodsThis phase II, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial enrolled subjects with a prior diagnosis of exudative AMD having received at least two intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF therapy. Subjects were randomised equally into four groups that received either daily 50mg, 100mg or 200mg dosages of X-82 or a placebo tablet. At each 4-week interval visit for 52 weeks, subjects were to be assessed to determine if rescue treatment was needed with anti-VEGF therapy.Results157 patients were enrolled. Due to gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary adverse events and the fulfilment of the primary endpoint, the trial was stopped prematurely after a second interim analysis. The primary endpoint of non-inferiority of visual acuity compared with placebo was demonstrated in all groups receiving X-82 (p<0.001). There was a dose-dependent trend in the number of injections over a 52-week period, with the 50 mg (n=40), 100 mg (n=39), 200 mg (n=39) and placebo (n=39) group requiring 6.7, 6.0, 4.7 and 8.1 injections, respectively.ConclusionsX-82 oral therapy in combination with pro re nata anti-VEGF injections showed non-inferiority in visual acuity outcomes while achieving a dose-dependent decrease in the number of anti-VEGF injections compared with placebo. Given the limited tolerability and safety issues observed, X-82 does not have a sufficient benefit to risk profile in treatment of patients with AMD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Zofia Michalewska ◽  
Jerzy Nawrocki

Purpose: This article studies visual outcome and frequency of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections continued in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who had an earlier vitrectomy for postinjection endophthalmitis. Methods: A retrospective interventional study was conducted reviewing our database for patients with a diagnosis of endophthalmitis in the course of anti-VEGF injections. Endophthalmitis diagnosis was made on clinical examination of pain, rapid decrease in visual acuity (VA), conjunctival hyperemia, hypopyon, and vitritis. In all eyes, core vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics was performed. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was performed monthly before and after surgery during follow-up. Anti-VEGF injections were continued after surgery in all cases. Results: Eight eyes with postinjection endophthalmitis were included. Mean VA immediately before endophthalmitis was 20/50 Snellen with a mean of 19 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections ( P = .45). At time of endophthalmitis diagnosis, mean VA was 20/1000 (range, 20/2000-20/200). Mean time from injection to when the patient noted first symptoms was 4.3 days (range, 1-8 days). Mean time from first symptoms to surgery was 12 hours (range, 2.5-26 hours). Final mean VA at the end of follow-up (range, 12-84 months) did not statistically differ from VA at the visit immediately before endophthalmitis diagnosis ( P = .69). Mean frequency of injections after vitrectomy did not significantly differ from the presurgical course of treatment ( P =.97). Conclusions: Anti-VEGF treatment might be continued after vitrectomy for endophthalmitis and results in satisfactory anatomical and visual outcome. Surgery did not influence the frequency of anti-VEGF injections for neovascular AMD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Martin Stattin ◽  
Julia Forster ◽  
Daniel Ahmed ◽  
Anna-Maria Haas ◽  
Alexandra Graf ◽  
...  

Purpose. To evaluate 7-year visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal injections (IVI) with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) based on a personalized pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Methods. Anonymized data of 124 consecutive eyes in 121 patients with treatment-naïve nAMD were initially collected in 2010. Of those, 45 received anti-VEGF IVI at least every 6months until 2017 in one single center in Austria and hence were retrospectively analyzed. All eyes had been initiated on a loading dose of 3 monthly IVI with different anti-VEGF agents followed by a PRN regimen in the first year. At year 2, monitoring as well as therapeutic intervention could be prolonged every 2weeks up to intervals of 3months without capping treatment. Primary outcome measure was the change of visual acuity (VA) assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts at 4 meters (ETDRS) in letters—counting every correctly read letter—and converted to Snellen. Secondary outcome measures were number of injections and change of central retinal thickness (CMT) from baseline. Results. Mean baseline VA was 20/63 + 1 (0.63 ± 0.26 ETDRS) and declined to 20/100 + 2 (0.45 ± 0.33) with an overall loss of 9 letters ETDRS after 7years (p = 0.001). An average of 3.5 ± 1.9 IVI was given per year and eye. Mean CMT at baseline was 322 ± 95 μm, decreased by 52 μm to 270 ± 70 μm within the first year, and remained below baseline at year 7 (271 ± 106 μm; p<0.001). Conclusions. Our data confirm an absolute vision loss in eyes compromised by nAMD after 7 years of continuous VEGF inhibition. The visual decline was significantly related to baseline VA as well as the number of injections. We suggest following patients thoroughly independent of the initial VA and a greater incentive for the physician to treat.


2010 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Winfried MK Amoaku ◽  

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of irreversible visual loss in the developed world. There are two types of AMD: dry and wet. The exact cause of the disease is unknown, but is thought to result from interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Smoking, hypertension and low intake and/or low levels of serum antioxidants are known risk factors for both forms. As yet there are no treatments available for the dry form of AMD. Smoking cessation and healthy lifestyles are important in the prevention of progression of AMD. Progression of early stages of AMD to advanced forms is slowed by regular intake of ocular nutritional supplements as found in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Study. Recently, there have been significant breakthroughs in the treatment of wet or neovascular AMD, including photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs, including pegaptanib, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Newer agents including aflibercept and anti-platelet-derived growth factor (anti-PDGF) compounds are under investigation. The current gold standard for treatment of wet AMD is intravitreal injections of ranibizumab. Combination therapy with PDT and anti-VEGF agents is useful especially in idiopathic polypoidal choroidopathy (IPCV) or when anti-VEGF monotherapy has failed. Rapid referral of patients with neovascular AMD is important as the visual outcome is dependent on the visual acuity at treatment. Diagnostic confirmation with retinal imaging, particularly fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherent tomography, are required before treatment commencement. The new treatments for wet AMD are repetitive, and have significant service implications. These implications occur irrespective of which anti- VEGF agent is adopted. Visual rehabilitation is still important in the management of AMD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Hacer Isildak ◽  
Stephen G. Schwartz ◽  
Harry W. Flynn

Intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been reported to occasionally produce a therapeutic effect in the uninjected fellow eye. Here, three patients with bilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration are presented. In all three patients, unilateral anti-VEGF injection resulted in bilateral reduction of macular thickness as measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Parikh ◽  
Paula W. Feng ◽  
Lucian V. Del Priore ◽  
Ron A. Adelman ◽  
Nauman A. Chaudhry

Purpose: To compare published self-reported practice patterns among retina specialists with published claims data representing actual practice patterns for the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the United States. Methods: We compared physician self-reported preference for anti-VEGF medications to treat AMD in the American Society of Retina Specialists’ Preferences and Trends (PAT) survey with a previously published study using claims data from 2006 to 2015 from OptumLabs Data Warehouse as a data source. A Pearson χ2 test compared the relative proportions of drug use between the 2 groups, with <.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: From 2006 to 2015, the PAT surveys had approximately 3548 respondents to questions on which anti-VEGF medication was used for the treatment of AMD. Over the study period, 62.3% (2211/3548) of respondents preferred bevacizumab, 30.4% (1078/3548) ranibizumab, and 7.3% (259/3548) aflibercept in the treatment of AMD. Claims data on anti-VEGF use for AMD noted 59.7% (359 267/601 917) of injections were for bevacizumab, 23.8% (143 200/601 917) were for ranibizumab, and 16.5% (99 450/601 917) were for aflibercept. The difference in the relative use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept use was not significant between the data sets ( P = .1991). Conclusions: The PAT survey responses appear to reflect actual physician practices based upon claims data and demonstrate the prevalence of bevacizumab as the prevailing treatment for AMD.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Zampros ◽  
Anna Praidou ◽  
Periklis Brazitikos ◽  
Panagiotis Ekonomidis ◽  
Sofia Androudi

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of severe visual loss and blindness over the age of 50 in developed countries. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is considered as a critical molecule in the pathogenesis of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), which characterizes the neovascular AMD. Anti-VEGF agents are considered the most promising way of effectively inhibition of the neovascular AMD process. VEGF is a heparin-binding glycoprotein with potent angiogenic, mitogenic and vascular permeability-enhancing activities specific for endothelial cells. Two anti-VEGF agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Pegaptanib sodium, which is an aptamer and ranibizumab, which is a monoclonal antibody fragment. Another humanized monoclonal antibody is currently off-label used, bevacizumab. This paper aims to discuss in details the effectiveness, the efficacy and safety of these three anti-VEGF agents. New anti-VEGF compounds which are recently investigated for their clinical usage (VEGF-trap, small interfering RNA) are also discussed for their promising outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Wai ◽  
Rishi P. Singh

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are the mainstay of therapy for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD), one of the leading causes of blindness in the developed world. There have been a variety of different treatment regimens that have been examined for the administration of anti-VEGF therapies, including continuous fixed dosing, pro re nata administration, and treat and extend (TAE) protocols. There is no clear consensus on which dosing regimen optimizes visual and anatomical outcomes while accounting for factors such as cost and patient burden. Based on recent surveys in 2014 and 2017 by the American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS), the majority of ophthalmology providers are utilizing TAE protocol for anti-VEGF dosing for the management of nvAMD. Although there are a number of clinical trials that have examined TAE dosing, the ALTAIR study is the first, large, prospective randomized controlled trial to compare two different TAE protocols utilizing the anti-VEGF agent aflibercept for nvAMD. The ALTAIR study, in conjunction with other previous clinical trials, suggests that TAE protocol with aflibercept is an effective anti-VEGF dosing regimen for patients with nvAMD as it produces good visual gains and minimizes cost and burden for the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document