scholarly journals IMMUNE-MEDIATED ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS THERAPY

2016 ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Reutova ◽  
K. P. Laktionov ◽  
V. V. Breder ◽  
K. A. Sarantseva ◽  
M. A. Okruzhnova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Mediated

scholarly journals Immuno-related endocrinopathy in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
D. I. Yudin ◽  
K. K. Laktionov ◽  
K. A. Sarantseva ◽  
O. I. Borisova ◽  
V. V. Breder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Discontinuation Of Treatment ◽  
The Russian Federation

Recently immune checkpoint inhibitors amazingly changed the landscape of cancer therapy worldwide. The number of immune checkpoint molecules in clinical practice is constantly increasing. There are some monoclonal antibodies recently registered in the Russian Federation: anti-PD1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab), anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab). Immune-mediated endocrinopathies are some of the most common complications of immunotherapy. According to the results of clinical studies, the incidence of serious endocrine immuno-mediated adverse events with anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies is low (3.5–8%). The use of anti-CTLA4 antibodies, combined regimens, and the use of immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy significantly increase the incidence of serious adverse events to 30%. In clinical practice of N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center among 245 non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immunotherapy, 22 (8,9%) developed an immune-mediated endocrinopathy. Most patients developed adverse events of 1–2 degrees, in two patients – 3 degrees, requiring discontinuation of treatment. The aim of this article was to provide useful information and recommendations regarding the management of common immuno-related endocrine adverse events (including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pituitary, adrenal insufficiency) for clinical oncologists.

scholarly journals Immune-mediated adverse events in immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy: literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-326
Author(s):  
Marina A. Lyadova ◽  
Vladimir K. Lyadov
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Interstitial Nephritis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Acute Interstitial Nephritis ◽  
Early Symptom ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Cutaneous Rash ◽  
Pancreatic Dysfunction

Immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) are complications of therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, which arise as a result of autoimmune inflammation. The article summarizes systemic (fatigue, fever), cutaneous (rash, itching), gastrointestinal (diarrhea, colitis, hepatitis, pancreatic dysfunction), endocrinological (hypothyroidism, hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus), pulmonary (pneumonitis, pleuritis), rheumatological (arthralgia), neurological (headache, sensory and motor disorders), renal (acute interstitial nephritis, lupus-like nephritis, granulomatous nephritis, diffuse interstitial nephritis and minimal change disease), hematological (anemia, cytopenia), cardiovascular (myocarditis) and ocular (conjunctivitis, episcleritis, ceratitis, blepharitis and uveitis) imAE. Pathogenetic mechanisms and treatment approaches (in accordance with toxicity grade and clinical recommendations) are discussed. Early symptom recognition, patient education and timely intervention are crucial for imAE correction.

scholarly journals An Evaluation of the Use of Corticosteroids for the Management of Immune-Mediated Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Tsui, PharmD ◽  
Linday Edmondson, PharmD, BCOP ◽  
Justin Julius, PharmD
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have gained prominence for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. However, they are associated with the development of immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs). Appropriate management of IMAEs and subsequent rechallenging of patients with ICI therapy remains an important area of research. The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of current prescribing practices and adherence to guideline recommendations for IMAE management. The incidence of symptom resolution, number of patients reinitiated with ICI therapy, and IMAE recurrence upon ICI therapy reinitiation were explored as secondary endpoints. A retrospective chart review within the Allegheny Health Network was conducted in cancer patients treated with ICI therapy who developed a documented ICI-associated IMAE and subsequently received corticosteroid therapy. IRB approval was obtained for this study. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze both primary and secondary endpoints. The study sample was made up of 81 patients. Overall, 50 out of 81 patient cases (62%) were found to be discordant with guideline recommendations; the primary factors identified were inappropriate starting corticosteroid dosing (64%), initiation of a corticosteroid taper prior to IMAE resolution to at least grade 1 severity, and condensed corticosteroid taper (74%). The main IMAEs identified were colitis (28%), pneumonitis (27%), and skin-related inflammation (12%). 76 out of the 81 patients (94%) achieved IMAE resolution; 41 patients (54%) were rechallenged with ICI therapy, of which 14 patients (34%) developed IMAE recurrence. Future studies may focus on evaluating different immunosuppression strategies to optimize IMAE management.

Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Toxicity

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Inno ◽  
Giulio Metro ◽  
Paolo Bironzo ◽  
Antonio M. Grimaldi ◽  
Elisabetta Grego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Know How ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Tumor Types

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as an effective treatment for several tumor types and their use in clinical practice is expected to further increase in the immediate future. Although these agents are well tolerated, they are associated with a peculiar spectrum of toxicity, which is immune mediated and may potentially affect every organ. However, immune-related adverse events are mostly reversible if promptly diagnosed and adequately treated. Therefore, it is crucial that medical oncologists know how to diagnose and treat immune-related adverse events. This review focuses on the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and management of immune-related toxicity of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies.

Immune-mediated adverse events following influenza vaccine in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan E Gwynn ◽  
David L DeRemer ◽  
Katherine M Saunders ◽  
Jigarkumar Parikh ◽  
Roni J Bollag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Patient Questionnaire ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Increased Risk

Objectives The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed treatment paradigms for various malignancies. Patients with cancer are at increased risk of complications and hospitalizations from influenza; therefore, it is recommended that they receive inactivated influenza vaccination. However, efficacy and safety of inactivated influenza vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors is uncertain. The objective of this prospective case series was to evaluate the incidence of immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) following inactivated influenza vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Changes in cytokine and chemokine levels were also evaluated. Methods Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors during the 2017–2018 influenza season were eligible for study participation. Peripheral blood samples were collected prior to administration of inactivated influenza vaccine and two post-vaccination time points. Evaluation of new or worsening imAEs occurred via patient questionnaire and review of medical records for 60 days following inactivated influenza vaccination. Baseline imAEs were evaluated from review of medical records for 60 days prior to inactivated influenza vaccination. Serum cytokines and chemokines were measured using a multiplex Luminex assay. Results Twenty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Seven patients experienced any grade imAE (one patient having 2) within 60 days following inactivated influenza vaccination. The majority were Grades 1–2, including rash ( n = 3), hypothyroidism, myalgia, and colitis ( n = 1 each). Two patients experienced severe imAEs (grade 3 nephritis and grade 4 diabetes). No significant changes ( p > 0.05) in serum cytokine or chemokine concentrations were observed. Conclusions Although small, our study suggests that inactivated influenza vaccine may be safely administered to patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. The majority of imAEs following inactivated influenza vaccination were Grades 1-2 and did not require changes in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

scholarly journals IMMU-04. IMMUNE-RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS STRONGLY PREDICT SUPERIOR OUTCOMES IN BRAIN METASTASES PATIENTS RECEIVING LOCAL TREATMENT AND IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii105-ii105
Author(s):  
Alexander Hulsbergen ◽  
Asad Lak ◽  
Yu Tung Lo ◽  
Nayan Lamba ◽  
Steven Nagtegaal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Immortal Time Bias ◽  
The Brain

Abstract INTRODUCTION In several cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a remarkable association between the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and superior oncological outcomes has been reported. This effect has hitherto not been reported in the brain. This study aimed to investigate the relation between irAEs and outcomes in brain metastases (BM) patients treated with both local treatment to the brain (LT; i.e. surgery and/or radiation) and ICIs. METHODS This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BMs in a tertiary institution in Boston, MA. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (IC-PFS), measured from the time of LT. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for immortal time bias (i.e., patients who live longer receive more cycles of ICIs and thus have more opportunity to develop an irAE). RESULTS A total of 184 patients were included; 62 (33.7%) were treated with neurosurgical resection and 122 (66.3%) with upfront brain radiation. irAEs occurred in 62 patients (33.7%). After adjusting for lung-Graded Prognostic Assessment, type of LT, type of ICI, newly diagnosed vs. recurrent BM, BM size and number, targetable mutations, and smoking status, irAEs were strongly associated with better OS (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19 – 0.58, p < 0.0001) and IC-PFS (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.26 – 0.65; p = 0.0001). Landmark analysis including only patients who received more than 3 cycles of ICI (n = 133) demonstrated similar results for OS and IC-PFS, as did sensitivity analysis adjusting for the number of cycles administered (HR range 0.36 – 0.51, all p-values < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS After adjusting for known prognostic factors, irAEs strongly predict superior outcomes after LT in NSCLC BM patients. Sensitivity analysis suggests that this is unlikely due to immortal time bias.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document