scholarly journals The Diagnostic Accuracy of Сoronary Сomputed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older

Kardiologiia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
S. G. Kozlov ◽  
O. V. Chernova ◽  
T. N. Veselova ◽  
S. K. Ternovoy
Keyword(s):  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Positive Result ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of сoronary сomputed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients aged ≥70 years. Materials and methods: The study included 390 patients aged ≥70 years with symptoms suggested stable CAD which underwent elective coronary artery angiography (CAG). Initially the prevalence of angiographically significant CAD was estimated according to the gender and chest pain character, and identifications of patients in whom CCTA was appropriate. After that diagnostic accuracy and сost-efficiency of CCTA in the diagnosis of stable CAD in 82 patients with atypical angina and non-anginal chest pain were evaluated. Results: The prevalence of obstructive CAD in patients with typical angina was very high and they were excluded from the final analysis. Among 82 patients with atypical angina and non-anginal pain which underwent CCTA 48 (59%) patients had obstructive CAD. CСTA data matched with results of CAG in all cases. Among 34 patients that had non-obstructive CAD the results of CCTA and CAG matched in 88% cases. CCTA has sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of 100%, 88%, 92% and 100% respectively. The likelihood ratio for positive result was 8.3, likelihood ratio for negative result was 0.3. Positive result increased post-test probability of obstructive CAD from 42% to 86%, negative result reduced post-test probability of obstructive CAD to 0%. Conclusion: negative CCTA result in patients aged 70 years and older with atypical angina and non-anginal pain allows to exclude the presence of obstructive CAD.  The likelihood ratio for positive result indicates a moderately difference between the pre-test and post-test probability of the presence of obstructive CAD. In patients aged ≥70 years with atypical angina or non-anginal chest pain which have inconclusive results of functional testing or unable undergo functional testing CCTA allows to increase diagnostic yield of CAG and reduce the frequency of minor complications and diagnostic evaluation costs.

Stress echocardiography vs coronary oomputed tomography angiography for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients aged >70 years with suspected stable coronary artery disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 2374
Author(s):  
S. G. Kozlov ◽  
O. V. Chernova ◽  
V. N. Shitov ◽  
T. N. Veselova ◽  
M. A. Saidova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Positive Result ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Anginal Pain ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Test Probability

Aim. To compare stress echocardiography and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients aged >70 years.Materials and methods. The study included 390 patients aged >70 years with suspected stable CAD, which underwent elective coronary artery angiography (CAG). Initially, patients for whom stress echocardiography and CCTA is appropriate was determined. After that diagnostic accuracy of both methods in the detection of obstructive CAD was evaluated in patients with atypical angina and non-anginal chest pain.Results. Among 111 patients with atypical angina and non-anginal pain which underwent stress echocardiography and had unequivocal results, 69 (62 %) patients had obstructive CAD. Stress echocardiography has sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 95%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 17,8, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0,1. Positive result increased probability of obstructive CAD from 62% to 95%, while negative result reduced probability to 16%. Among 82 patients with atypical angina and non-anginal pain which underwent CCTA, 48 (59 %) patients had obstructive CAD. CCTA has sensitivity of 100 %, specificity of 88%, LR+ of 8,3, and LR- of 0,3. Positive result increased post-test probability of obstructive CAD from 59% to 86%, while negative result reduced post-test probability to 0%.Conclusion. Stress echocardiography and CCTA has comparable diagnostic accuracy in the detection of obstructive CAD in patients aged >70 years with atypical angina and non-anginal pain. Stress echocardiography has a greater diagnostic value of positive result; CCTA has a greater diagnostic value of negative result.

scholarly journals Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1198-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco ◽  
Antti Saraste ◽  
Davide Capodanno ◽  
Eva Prescott ◽  
Haitham Ballo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Diagnostic Technique ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Selection Tool ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Abstract Aims To provide a pooled estimation of contemporary pre-test probabilities (PTPs) of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) across clinical patient categories, re-evaluate the utility of the application of diagnostic techniques according to such estimates, and propose a comprehensive diagnostic technique selection tool for suspected CAD. Methods and results Estimates of significant CAD prevalence across sex, age, and type of chest pain categories from three large-scale studies were pooled (n = 15 815). The updated PTPs and diagnostic performance profiles of exercise electrocardiogram, invasive coronary angiography, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), positron emission tomography (PET), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and SPECT were integrated to define the PTP ranges in which ruling-out CAD is possible with a post-test probability of <10% and <5%. These ranges were then integrated in a new colour-coded tabular diagnostic technique selection tool. The Bayesian relationship between PTP and the rate of diagnostic false positives was explored to complement the characterization of their utility. Pooled CAD prevalence was 14.9% (range = 1–52), clearly lower than that used in current clinical guidelines. Ruling-out capabilities of non-invasive imaging were good overall. The greatest ruling-out capacity (i.e. post-test probability <5%) was documented by CCTA, PET, and stress CMR. With decreasing PTP, the fraction of false positive findings rapidly increased, although a lower CAD prevalence partially cancels out such effect. Conclusion The contemporary PTP of significant CAD across symptomatic patient categories is substantially lower than currently assumed. With a low prevalence of the disease, non-invasive testing can rarely rule-in the disease and focus should shift to ruling-out obstructive CAD. The large proportion of false positive findings must be taken into account when patients with low PTP are investigated.

scholarly journals Discrimination capability of pretest probability of stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis suggesting how to improve validation procedures

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e047677
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Mincarone ◽  
Antonella Bodini ◽  
Maria Rosaria Tumolo ◽  
Federico Vozzi ◽  
Silvia Rocchiccioli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
First Line ◽  
Discrimination Capability ◽  
Artery Disease

ObjectiveExternally validated pretest probability models for risk stratification of subjects with chest pain and suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD), determined through invasive coronary angiography or coronary CT angiography, are analysed to characterise the best validation procedures in terms of discriminatory ability, predictive variables and method completeness.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesGlobal Health (Ovid), Healthstar (Ovid) and MEDLINE (Ovid) searched on 22 April 2020.Eligibility criteriaWe included studies validating pretest models for the first-line assessment of patients with chest pain and suspected stable CAD. Reasons for exclusion: acute coronary syndrome, unstable chest pain, a history of myocardial infarction or previous revascularisation; models referring to diagnostic procedures different from the usual practices of the first-line assessment; univariable models; lack of quantitative discrimination capability.MethodsEligibility screening and review were performed independently by all the authors. Disagreements were resolved by consensus among all the authors. The quality assessment of studies conforms to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A random effects meta-analysis of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for each validated model was performed.Results27 studies were included for a total of 15 models. Besides age, sex and symptom typicality, other risk factors are smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. Only one model considers genetic profile. AUC values range from 0.51 to 0.81. Significant heterogeneity (p<0.003) was found in all but two cases (p>0.12). Values of I2 >90% for most analyses and not significant meta-regression results undermined relevant interpretations. A detailed discussion of individual results was then carried out.ConclusionsWe recommend a clearer statement of endpoints, their consistent measurement both in the derivation and validation phases, more comprehensive validation analyses and the enhancement of threshold validations to assess the effects of pretest models on clinical management.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019139388.

Diagnostic Value of the Updated Diamond and Forrester Score to Predict Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute-Onset Chest Pain

Cardiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Sørgaard ◽  
Jesper James Linde ◽  
Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed ◽  
Jørgen Tobias Kühl ◽  
Henning Kelbæk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Photon Emission ◽  
Acute Onset ◽  
Emission Computed Tomography ◽  
Artery Disease

Objectives: In the recently updated clinical guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology on the management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD), the updated Diamond Forrester score has been included as a pretest probability (PTP) score to select patients for further diagnostic testing. We investigated the validity of the new guidelines in a population of patients with acute-onset chest pain. Methods: We examined 527 consecutive patients with either an exercise-ECG stress test or single-photon emission computed tomography, and subsequently coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We compared the diagnostic accuracy of PTP and stress testing assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to identify significant CAD, defined as at least 1 coronary artery branch with >70% diameter stenosis identified by CCTA. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of PTP was significantly higher than the stress test (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.69; p = 0.009), but the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of PTP and a stress test did not significantly increase when compared to PTP alone (AUC 0.86 vs. 0.80; p = 0.06). Conclusions: PTP using the updated Diamond and Forrester Score is a very useful tool in risk-stratifying patients with acute-onset chest pain at a low-to-intermediate risk of having CAD. Adding a stress test to PTP does not appear to offer significant diagnostic benefit.

scholarly journals Ultrasound diagnosis of molar pregnancy

Ultrasound ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie A. Ross ◽  
Alina Unipan ◽  
Jackie Clarke ◽  
Catherine Magee ◽  
Jemma Johns
Keyword(s):  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease ◽  
Ultrasound Diagnosis ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Molar Pregnancy ◽  
Diagnostic Challenge ◽  
Trophoblastic Disease ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Introduction The primary aims of this study were to establish what proportion of ultrasonically suspected molar pregnancies were proven on histological examination and what proportion of histologically diagnosed molar pregnancies were identified by ultrasound pre-operatively. The secondary aim was to review the features of these scans to help identify criteria that may improve ultrasound diagnosis. Methods This was a retrospective observational study conducted in the Early Pregnancy Unit at King’s College Hospital London over an 11-year period. Cases of ultrasonically suspected molar pregnancy or other gestational trophoblastic disease were identified and compared with the final histopathological diagnosis. In addition, cases which were diagnosed on histopathology that were not suspected on ultrasound were also examined. In discrepant cases, the images were reviewed unblinded by two senior sonographers. Statistical analysis for likelihood ratio and post-test probabilities was performed. Results One hundred eighty-two women had gestational trophoblastic disease suspected on ultrasound examination (1:360, 0.3%); 106/182 (58.2%, 95% CI 51.0 to 65.2%) had histologically confirmed gestational trophoblastic disease. The likelihood ratio for gestational trophoblastic disease after a positive ultrasound was 607.27, with a post-test probability of 0.628.The sensitivity of ultrasound for gestational trophoblastic disease was 70.7% (95% CI 62.9% to 77.4%) with an estimated specificity of 99.88% (95% CI 99.85% to 99.91%); 102/143 (71.3%, 95% CI 63.4 to 78.1%) molar pregnancies were suspected on pre-op ultrasound; 60/68 (88.2%, 95% CI 78.2 to 94.2%) of complete moles were suspected on pre-op ultrasound, compared with 42/75 (56.0%, 95% CI 44.7 to 66.7%) of partial moles. On retrospective review of the pre-op ultrasound images, there were cases that could have been suspected prior to surgery. Conclusion Detecting molar pregnancy by ultrasound remains a diagnostic challenge, particularly for partial moles. These data suggest that there has been an increase in both the predictive value and the sensitivity of ultrasound over time, with a high LR and post-test probability; however, the diagnostic criteria remain ill-defined and could be improved.

scholarly journals Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Báez-Saldaña ◽  
Uriel Rumbo-Nava ◽  
Araceli Escobar-Rojas ◽  
Patricia Castillo-González ◽  
Santiago León-Dueñas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Definitive Diagnosis ◽  
Accuracy Analysis ◽  
Pleural Biopsy ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

ABSTRACT Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. Results: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. Conclusions: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: clinical value

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikant Sabharwal ◽  
Parthiban Arumugam ◽  
Andrew Kelion
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Hibernating Myocardium ◽  
Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Artery Disease

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is most commonly used to diagnose or exclude obstructive coronary disease in patients presenting with chest pain. This chapter covers the value of MPS in this context, as well as providing detail on the guidelines which help the clinician choose what investigations are appropriate for the patient presenting with chest pain. It also details a number of considerations related to the use of MPS, such as its cost-effectiveness and the prognosis value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared to exercise ECG, X-ray computed tomographic coronary angiography, and other imaging investigations. Risk assessment prior to elective non-cardiac surgery is covered, with detailed attention paid to the challenges of assessing coronary artery disease special groups including women and patients with diabetes or renal disease. This chapter also covers assessment in known stable coronary artery disease, predicting the value of coronary revascularization and hibernating myocardium.

scholarly journals Clinical predictors of hypoxemia in pneumonia

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Eka Gunawijaya ◽  
I M Widia
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Clinical Predictor ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability ◽  
Saturation Measurement

Background Pneumonia is one of the main causes of death ininfants in developing countries. The device of oxygen saturationmeasurement for detecting hypoxemia is limited in district hospi-tals.Objective The aim of our study was to find the best clinical pre-dictor for hypoxemia that could be used in Indonesia.Methods Between June 2001 until May 2002, the diagnostic testwas performed in 125 infants aged 2–12 month-old who sufferedfrom pneumonia. The oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxim-etry was used as the gold standard.Results The samples were divided into two groups, 52 infants withhypoxemia and 73 normal. The base characteristics of both groupswere not statistically different. The prevalence of hypoxemia was41.6%. The best single clinical predictor of hypoxemia was cyano-sis (the sensitivity 92%, specificity 86%, likelihood ratio 6.74, post-test probability 83%), as well as the combination of two clinicalpredictors i.e., cyanosis and nasal flaring. The best combination ofthree clinical predictors was cyanosis, nasal flaring, and refusal todrink (the sensitivity 92%, specificity 86%, likelihood ratio 6.74,post-test probability 81%).Conclusion The combination of cyanosis and nasal flaring isgood enough as a predictor to detect hypoxemia in area with nofacility of oxygen saturation measurement

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document