Does Reading Fluency Predict Reading Comprehension of Korean Middle School EFL Learners?

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
Junhee Park
2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-143
Author(s):  
강유선 ◽  
Boram Moon ◽  
Yeoeun Park ◽  
허윤지

Author(s):  
A Young Park

Extensive Reading (ER) is a reading approach that aims to make covering large amounts of reading material enjoyable for language learners. Many experimental studies have showed the effectiveness of the ER approach on reading fluency, the ability to read words and process text rapidly and accurately. Though revealing, these findings need to be interpreted with caution due to methodological defects in the measurement of reading fluency in these ER studies. This quasi-experimental study compared the effect of the ER approach with that of the conventional Intensive Reading (IR) approach on EFL learners’ reading rate and reading comprehension with regard to leaners’ proficiency level. Over a 12-week timespan, two intact classes of 72 Korean secondary students received either ER (N = 36) or IR (N = 36) instruction, with pre- and post- differences in performance examined with regard to proficiency level.  Results of an ANCOVA revealed that students’ reading rate and comprehension increased significantly more from the ER approach than from the IR approach. That is, students from the ER group significantly increased their reading rate in comparison to the IR group without impairing reading comprehension. More specifically, the ER approach had a greater positive impact on the learners’ reading rate than the IR approach irrespective of participants’ English proficiency level. However, in terms of reading comprehension, the advanced and intermediate level learners benefited more from the ER approach, while the low level learners benefited more from the IR approach. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawna Duff

Purpose Vocabulary intervention can improve comprehension of texts containing taught words, but it is unclear if all middle school readers get this benefit. This study tests 2 hypotheses about variables that predict response to vocabulary treatment on text comprehension: gains in vocabulary knowledge due to treatment and pretreatment reading comprehension scores. Method Students in Grade 6 ( N = 23) completed a 5-session intervention based on robust vocabulary instruction (RVI). Knowledge of the semantics of taught words was measured pre- and posttreatment. Participants then read 2 matched texts, 1 containing taught words (treated) and 1 not (untreated). Treated texts and taught word lists were counterbalanced across participants. The difference between text comprehension scores in treated and untreated conditions was taken as a measure of the effect of RVI on text comprehension. Results RVI resulted in significant gains in knowledge of taught words ( d RM = 2.26) and text comprehension ( d RM = 0.31). The extent of gains in vocabulary knowledge after vocabulary treatment did not predict the effect of RVI on comprehension of texts. However, untreated reading comprehension scores moderated the effect of the vocabulary treatment on text comprehension: Lower reading comprehension was associated with greater gains in text comprehension. Readers with comprehension scores below the mean experienced large gains in comprehension, but those with average/above average reading comprehension scores did not. Conclusion Vocabulary instruction had a larger effect on text comprehension for readers in Grade 6 who had lower untreated reading comprehension scores. In contrast, the amount that children learned about taught vocabulary did not predict the effect of vocabulary instruction on text comprehension. This has implications for the identification of 6th-grade students who would benefit from classroom instruction or clinical intervention targeting vocabulary knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document